Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 419–426 | Cite as

Effects of aging on surface properties and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on various fissure sealants

  • Ralf Bürgers
  • Tashiana Cariaga
  • Rainer Müller
  • Martin Rosentritt
  • Udo Reischl
  • Gerhard Handel
  • Sebastian Hahnel
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of the present study was the quantification of Streptococcus mutans adhesion on ten widely used pit and fissure sealant materials and the correlation of these findings to surface roughness (R a) and surface free energy (SFE). Additionally, changes in streptococcal adhesion and surface parameters after water immersion and artificial aging have been investigated. Circular specimens of ten fissure sealants (seven resin-based composites, two glass ionomers, and one compomer) were made and polished. Surface roughness was determined by perthometer and SFE by goniometer measurements. Sealant materials were incubated with S. mutans suspension (2.5 h, 37°C), and adhering bacteria were quantified by using a biofluorescence assay in combination with an automated plate reader. Surface properties and S. mutans adhesion were measured prior to and after water immersion after 1 and 6 months and after additional thermocycling (5,000 cycles; 5°C/55°C). The tested sealants showed significant differences in S. mutans adhesion prior to and after the applied aging procedures. Aging resulted in slight increases (mostly <0.2 μm) in surface roughness, as well as in significant decreases in SFE and in significantly lower quantities of adhering bacteria. Ketac Bond and UltraSeal XT plus revealed the lowest adhesion potential after artificial aging. In general, the amount of adhering S. mutans was reduced after aging, which may be related to the decline in SFEs.

Keywords

Aging Surface properties Adhesion Streptococcus mutans Fissure sealants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The technical assistance of Gerlinde Held and Anja Dirscherl is appreciated. We are grateful to Monika Schoell for the linguistic revision of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Makela M (2004) Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001830(3)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    An YH, Friedman RJ (1998) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 43:338–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, van Palenstein Helderman WH (2006) Caries-preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 34:403–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 13:258–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G (2007) Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent 98:461–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, van der Mei HC, van Pelt AW, de Jong HP, Arends J (1984) Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:980–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Busscher HJ, Uyen MH, Weerkamp AH, Postma WJ, Arends J (1986) Reversibility of adhesion of oral streptococci to solids. FEMS Microbiol Lett 35:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlsson A, Petersson M, Twetman S (1997) 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young schoolchildren at caries risk. Am J Dent 10:115–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Stoppelaar JD, van HJ, Backer DO (1969) The relationship between extracellular polysaccharide-producing streptococci and smooth surface caries in 13-year-old children. Caries Res 3:190–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppa L, Luoma H (1991) Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 25:454–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffin SO, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch BF, Bader J (2008) The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res 87:169–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G (2008) Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(7):2619–2627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM (1992) Caries-like lesion formation around fluoride-releasing sealant and glass ionomer. Am J Dent 5:329–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim JW, Jang KT, Lee SH, Kim CC, Hahn SH, Garcia-Godoy F (2002) Effect of curing method and curing time on the microhardness and wear of pit and fissure sealants. Dent Mater 18:120–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lam A (2008) Increase in utilization of dental sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:81–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loesche WJ (1986) Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 50:353–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Garcia-Godoy F (1996) Antibacterial activity of fluoride release sealants on mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20:109–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mass E, Eli I, Lev-Dor-Samovici B, Weiss EI (1999) Continuous effect of pit and fissure sealing on S. mutans presence in situ. Pediatr Dent 21:164–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matalon S, Slutzky H, Mazor Y, Weiss EI (2003) Surface antibacterial properties of fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 25:43–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLean JW, Wilson AD (1974) Fissure sealing and filling with an adhesive glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J 136:269–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mejare I, Lingstrom P, Petersson LG, Holm AK, Twetman S, Kallestal C (2003) Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 61:321–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menon P, Shashikiran ND, Reddy VV (2007) Comparison of antibacterial properties of two fluoride-releasing and a nonfluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealants. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 25:133–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V (1998) Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 19:529–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nicholson JW (2007) Polyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”) and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 23:615–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nyvad B, Kilian M (1987) Microbiology of the early colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 95:369–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Powers JM, Fan PL, Marcotte M (1981) In vitro accelerated aging of composites and a sealant. J Dent Res 60:1672–1677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pratt-Terpstra IH, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ (1989) The effects of pellicle formation on streptococcal adhesion to human enamel and artificial substrata with various surface free-energies. J Dent Res 68:463–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pratt-Terpstra IH, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ (1988) On a relation between interfacial free energy-dependent and noninterfacial free energy-dependent adherence of oral streptococci to solid substrata. Curr Microbiol 16:311–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pratt-Terpstra IH, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ (1988) Microbial factors in a thermodynamic approach of oral streptococcal adhesion to solid substrata. J Colloid Interface Sci 129:568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Quirynen M (1994) The clinical meaning of the surface roughness and the surface free energy of intra-oral hard substrata on the microbiology of the supra- and subgingival plaque: results of in vitro and in vivo experiments. J Dent 22(Suppl 1):S13–S16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Quirynen M, Bollen CM (1995) The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 22:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Groger G, Muhlfriedel B, Burgers R, Handel G (2007) Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to various dental materials in a laminar flow chamber system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 86:36–44Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simonsen RJ (1996) Glass ionomer as fissure sealant—a critical review. J Public Health Dent 56:146–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smallridge J (2000) UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Management of the stained fissure in the first permanent molar. Int J Paediatr Dent 10:79–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tari BF, Nalbant D, Dogruman AF, Kustimur S (2007) Surface roughness and adherence of Candida albicans on soft lining materials as influenced by accelerated aging. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:18–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Teughels W, Van AN, Sliepen I, Quirynen M (2006) Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(Suppl 2):68–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weerkamp AH, Uyen HM, Busscher HJ (1988) Effect of zeta potential and surface energy on bacterial adhesion to uncoated and saliva-coated human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 67:1483–1487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weerkamp AH, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (1985) The surface free energy of oral streptococci after being coated with saliva and its relation to adhesion in the mouth. J Dent Res 64:1204–1210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Whittaker CJ, Klier CM, Kolenbrander PE (1996) Mechanisms of adhesion by oral bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 50:513–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yip HK, To WM, Smales RJ (2004) Effects of artificial saliva and APF gel on the surface roughness of newer glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 29:661–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zanin FR, Garcia LF, Casemiro LA, Pires-de-Souza FC (2008) Effect of artificial accelerated aging on color stability and surface roughness of indirect composites. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 16:10–14PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Bürgers
    • 1
    • 4
  • Tashiana Cariaga
    • 1
  • Rainer Müller
    • 2
  • Martin Rosentritt
    • 1
  • Udo Reischl
    • 3
  • Gerhard Handel
    • 1
  • Sebastian Hahnel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Prosthetic DentistryRegensburg University Medical CentreRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Physical and Theoretical ChemistryUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Microbiology and HygieneRegensburg University Medical CentreRegensburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of Prosthetic DentistryRegensburg University Medical CentreRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations