Effect of food preservatives on in situ biofilm formation
- 332 Downloads
The aim of this double-blind, controlled crossover study was to evaluate the influence of food preservatives on in situ dental biofilm growth. Twenty-four volunteers wore appliances with six specimens each of bovine enamel to build up intra-oral biofilms. During three test cycles, the subjects had to put one half of the appliance twice a day in one of the assigned active solutions (0.1% benzoate, BA; 0.1% sorbate, SA or 0.2% chlorhexidine, CHX) and the other into NaCl. After 5 days, the developed biofilms were stained with two fluorescent dyes to visualise vital (green) and dead bacteria (red). Biofilms were scanned by confocal laser scanning microscopy and biofilm thickness (BT) and bacterial vitality (BV%) were calculated. After a washout period of 7 days, a new test cycle was started. The use of SA, BA and CHX resulted in a significantly reduced BT and BV compared to NaCl (p < 0.001). Differences between SA and BA were not significant (p > 0.05) for both parameters, while CHX showed significantly lower values. Both preservatives showed antibacterial and plaque-inhibiting properties, but not to the extent of CHX. The biofilm model enabled the examination of undisturbed oral biofilm formation influenced by antibacterial components under clinical conditions.
KeywordsBiofilm Plaque vitality Confocal laser scanning microscopy
This investigation was financially supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; Ar 341/3-1). The authors thank Marie Follo, Ph.D., Department of Hematology and Oncology, Core facility, University of Freiburg for her help in the image analysis and preparing the manuscript.
Declaration of Interests
There are no conflicts of interest for any author.
- 1.Al-Ahmad A, Wunder A, Auschill TM, Follo M, Braun G, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB (2007) The in vivo dynamics of Streptococcus spp., Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella spp. in dental plaque biofilm as analysed by five-colour multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Med Microbiol 56:681–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chichester DF, Tanner FW (1968) Antimicrobial food additives. In: Furia TE (ed) CRC handbook of food additives. Chemical Rubber Co, Cleveland, pp 142–157Google Scholar
- 8.Consensus Statement on Diet on the FDI’s Second World Conference on Oral Health Promotion (2000). Int Dent J 50:174Google Scholar
- 19.Roberts SK, Bass C, Brading M, Lappin-Scott H, Stoodley P (1999) Biofilm formation and structure: what’s new? In: Newman HN, Wilson M (eds) Dental plaque revisited—oral biofilms in health and disease. BioLine, Cardiff, pp 15–36Google Scholar
- 21.Standard and Poor’s Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages (1998) Handbook, Standard and Poor’s Corporation, New York, Sect 166, p12Google Scholar