Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 9–14 | Cite as

The predictivity of mandibular third molar position as a risk indicator for pericoronitis

  • Kemal Yamalık
  • Süleyman BozkayaEmail author
Original Article


The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of the mandibular third molar at highest risk for acute pericoronitis using clinical and radiographic analysis. A total of 102 volunteers, including 40 (39%) male and 62 (60%) female patients presenting with acute pericoronitis, participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 23.4 years (range 17–30 years). The variables tested included the percentage of soft tissue coverage, availability of impinging maxillary dentition, and the angulation and eruption level of the mandibular third molar. While vertical impaction was the most frequent angulation (51%), horizontal impaction was quite rare (3%). Mesioangular impaction (25%) was slightly higher than distoangular impaction (21%). Difference between type of angulation was statistically significant for all groups (p < 0.05). The frequency of partial soft tissue coverage, particularly 75% coverage, was far more observed than the full soft tissue coverage (47%). The difference for the amount of soft tissue coverage was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In 57% of the cases, pericoronitis was associated with the third molars that erupted at the same level of the adjacent tooth occlusal plane. The difference among the three levels of eruption was significant (p < 0.000). Impinging maxillary dentition did not have a significant impact on development of pericoronitis (41%). Evidence of impinging maxillary dentition did not have a statistically significant impact on presence of pericoronitis (p = 0.075). Mandibular third molars at or near to the same level of the occlusal plane of the arch and exhibiting vertical inclination were considered at highest risk for developing pericoronitis. Such third molars can be given high priority for prophylactic care due to the possibility of severe consequences of acute pericoronitis.


Third molars Pericoronitis Panoramic radiograph Impaction Prediction of pericoronitis 


  1. 1.
    Bataineh AB (2003) The predisposing factors of pericoronitis of mandibular third molars in a Jordanian population. Quintessence Int 34(3):227–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS (1980) Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 101(2):240–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganss C, Hochban W, Kielbassa AM, Umstadt HE (1993) Prognosis of third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 76(6):688–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Güngörmüs M (2002) Pathologic status and changes in mandibular third molar position during orthodontic treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 15 3(2):11–22Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halverson BA, Anderson WH 3rd (1992) The mandibular third molar position as a predictive criteria for risk for pericoronitis: a retrospective study. Mil Med 157(3):142–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hattab FN (1997) Positional changes and eruption of impacted mandibular third molars in young adults. A radiographic 4-year follow-up study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 84(6):604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kay LW (1966) Investigations into the nature of pericoronitis. Br J Oral Surg 3(3):188–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leone SA, Edenfield MJ, Cohen ME (1986) Correlation of acute pericoronitis and the position of the mandibular third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62(3):245–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lysell L, Rohlin M (1988) A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17(3):161–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mollaoglu N, Cetiner S, Gungor K (2002) Patterns of third molar impaction in a group of volunteers in Turkey. Clin Oral Investig 6(2):109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niedzielska IA, Drugacz J, Kus N, Kreska J (2006) Panoramic radiographic predictors of mandibular third molar eruption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 102(2):154–158;discussion 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR (1988) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, pp. 227–228Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Ochareon P (1999) Symptoms of unerupted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 87(3):305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sasano T, Kuribara N, Iikubo M, Yoshida A, Satoh-Kuiriwada S, Shoji N, Sakamoto M (2003) Influence of angular position and degree of impaction of third molars on development of symptoms: long-term follow-up under good oral hygiene conditions. Tohoku J Exp Med 200(2):75–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ventä I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Meurman J, Ylipaavalniemi P (1991) Assessing the eruption of lower third molars on the basis of radiographic features. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29(4):259–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallace JR (1966) Pericoronitis and military dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 22(4):545–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of GaziAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Necatibey CadAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations