# Bounds for the sum of dependent risks and worst Value-at-Risk with monotone marginal densities

- 892 Downloads
- 70 Citations

## Abstract

In quantitative risk management, it is important and challenging to find sharp bounds for the distribution of the sum of dependent risks with given marginal distributions, but an unspecified dependence structure. These bounds are directly related to the problem of obtaining the worst Value-at-Risk of the total risk. Using the idea of complete mixability, we provide a new lower bound for any given marginal distributions and give a necessary and sufficient condition for the sharpness of this new bound. For the sum of dependent risks with an identical distribution, which has either a monotone density or a tail-monotone density, the explicit values of the worst Value-at-Risk and bounds on the distribution of the total risk are obtained. Some examples are given to illustrate the new results.

## Keywords

Complete mixability Monotone density Sum of dependent risks Value-at-Risk## Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

60E05 60E15## JEL Classification

G10## Notes

### Acknowledgements

We thank the co-editor Kerry Back, an associate editor and two reviewers for their helpful comments which significantly improved this paper. Wang’s research was partly supported by the Bob Price Fellowship at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Peng’s research was supported by NSF Grant DMS-1005336. Yang’s research was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11131002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11271033).

## References

- 1.Denuit, M., Genest, C., Marceau, É.: Stochastic bounds on sums of dependent risks. Insur. Math. Econ.
**25**, 85–104 (1999) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.Embrechts, P., Höing, A., Juri, A.: Using copulae to bound the value-at-risk for functions of dependent risks. Finance Stoch.
**7**, 145–167 (2003) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Embrechts, P., Höing, A.: Extreme VaR scenarios in higher dimensions. Extremes
**9**, 177–192 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G.: Bounds for functions of dependent risks. Finance Stoch.
**10**, 341–352 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G.: Bounds for functions of multivariate risks. J. Multivar. Anal.
**97**, 526–547 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Embrechts, P., Puccetti, G.: Risk aggregation. In: Jaworski, P., et al. (eds.) Copula Theory and Its Applications. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 198, pp. 111–126. Springer, Berlin (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gaffke, N., Rüschendorf, L.: On a class of extremal problems in statistics. Math. Operforsch. Stat., Ser. Optim.
**12**, 123–135 (1981) zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 8.Kaas, R., Laeven, R., Nelsen, R.: Worst VaR scenarios with given marginals and measures of association. Insur. Math. Econ.
**44**, 146–158 (2009) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Knott, M., Smith, C.S.: Choosing joint distributions so that the variance of the sum is small. J. Multivar. Anal.
**97**, 1757–1765 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Puccetti, G., Rüschendorf, L.: Bounds for joint portfolios of dependent risks. J. Comput. Appl. Math.
**236**, 1833–1840 (2012) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Rüschendorf, L.: Random variables with maximum sums. Adv. Appl. Probab.
**14**, 623–632 (1982) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Rüschendorf, L.: Solution of a statistical optimization problem by rearrangement methods. Metrika
**30**, 55–61 (1983) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Rüschendorf, L., Uckelmann, L.: Variance minimization and random variables with constant sum. In: Cuadras, C.M., Fortiana, J., Rodrguez-Lallena, J.A. (eds.) Distributions with Given Marginals, pp. 211–222. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2002) Google Scholar
- 14.Wang, B., Wang, R.: The complete mixability and convex minimization problems for monotone marginal distributions. J. Multivar. Anal.
**102**, 1344–1360 (2011) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar