Asymmetric Information in Fads Models
- 108 Downloads
Fads models were introduced by Shiller (Am Econ Rev 71:421–436, 1981) and Summers (J Finance 41:591–601, 1986) as plausible alternatives to the efficient markets/constant expected returns assumptions. Under these models, logarithms of asset prices embody both a martingale component, with permanent shocks, and a stationary component, with temporary shocks. We study a continuous-time version of these models both from the point of view of informed agents, who observe both fundamental and market values, and from that of uninformed agents, who only observe market prices. We specify the asset price in the larger filtration of the informed agent, and then derive its decomposition in the smaller filtration of the uninformed agent using the Hitsuda representation of Gaussian processes. For uninformed agents we obtain a non-Markovian dynamics, which justifies the use of technical analysis in optimal trading strategies. For both types of agents, we solve the problem of maximization of expected logarithmic utility from terminal wealth, and obtain an explicit formula for the additional logarithmic utility of informed agents. Finally, we apply the decomposition result to the problem of testing the presence of fads from market data. An application to the NYSE-AMEX indices from the CRSP database shows that, if the fads component prevails, then the mean-reversion speed must be slow.
KeywordsOrnstein–Uhlenbeck Hitsuda representation Fads models Asymmetric information
Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)60G15 62M07 45D05 91B84
JEL ClassificationsC15 C22
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Cheridito, P. , Representations of Gaussian measures that are equivalent to Wiener measure. In: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXVII, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1382, pp. 81–89 Berlin Heidelberg New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dunford N., Schwartz J.T. (1988) Linear operators. Part II, Wiley Classics Library. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. In: Graduate texts in mathematics, 2nd edn. vol. 113. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1991Google Scholar
- 13.Kohatsu-Higa A. (2004) Enlargement of filtrations and models for insider trading. In: Akahori J., Ogawa S.,Watanabe S. (eds). Stochastic processes and applications to mathematical finance. World Scientifc, Singapore, pp. 151–165Google Scholar
- 18.Revuz, D., Yor, M. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion, In: Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 3rd edn. vol. 293. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1999Google Scholar
- 19.Shiller R.J. (1981) Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends. Am Econ Rev 71, 421–436Google Scholar
- 21.Smithies F. (1958) Integral equations. In: Cambridge tracts in mathematics and mathematical Physics, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar