Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 1631–1650 | Cite as

Performative technologies for heritage site regeneration

  • Liam Betsworth
  • Huw Bowen
  • Simon Robinson
  • Matt Jones
Original Article

Abstract

Heritage sites are an important part of understanding our role in history. They have the potential to teach us important lessons, such as where we came from and subsequently, the people it has made us today. As members of a large, heritage-led, regeneration project, we are working with the Hafod–Morfa Copperworks, a heritage site in the Lower Swansea Valley where there is not much to see or hear. The few ruins at the site make it difficult to imagine what the site would have been like back in its heyday. Our goal at the site is to draw people together, not to view a finished piece of curated heritage, but rather, to start conversations about their memories and the significance of the site to them and to discover what they would like to see at the site in the future. The technology we are producing is about engaging with the local community and stakeholders as groups to provoke discussion. This contrasts with previous uses of mobile guides which only attempt to be tourist aids. In this article, we report on two prototype technologies we have developed to help accomplish this task. Throughout the article, we discuss how and why designing performative technologies could help encourage people to visit, socialise and communicate within the area. Our early results suggest that expressive performative technologies are good at gaining spectators’ attention and encouraging an active engagement between performer and spectator.

Keywords

Performance Heritage Regeneration Pico projection Situated audio 

References

  1. 1.
    Ardito C, Costabile M, De Angeli A, Lanzilotti R (2012) Enriching archaeological parks with contextual sounds and mobile technology. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 19(4):29–12930. doi:10.1145/2395131.2395136 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benford S, Crabtree A, Flintham M, Greenhalgh C, Koleva B, Adams M, Tandavanitj N, Farr JR, Giannachi G, Lindt I (2011) Creating the spectacle: designing interactional trajectories through spectator interfaces. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 18(3):11:1–11:28. doi:10.1145/1993060.1993061 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Betsworth L, Robinson S, Jones M (2013) Pico projection for performative place based services. EIPS Workshop at CHI ’13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bongers B (2012) The projector as instrument. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 16(1):65–75. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0378-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardiff J Her long black hair. http://www.cardiffmiller.com/artworks/walks/longhair.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2013
  7. 7.
    Dalsgaard P, Hansen LK (2008) Performing perception–staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 15(3):13:1–13:33. doi:10.1145/1453152.1453156 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzgerald E, Taylor C, Craven M (2013) To the castle! A comparison of two audio guides to enable public discovery of historical events. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(4):749–760. doi:10.1007/s00779-012-0624-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fosh L, Benford S, Reeves S, Koleva B, Brundell P (2013) See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’13. ACM, pp 149–158. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470675
  10. 10.
    Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday anchor books. DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goffman E (1966) Behavior in public places; notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Press of Glencoe, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    GoogleMaps: Google maps street view: National botanic garden of wales. http://goo.gl/maps/exaFC. Accessed 15 May 2013
  13. 13.
    Hansen LK, Rico J, Jacucci G, Brewster S, Ashbrook D (2011) Performative interaction in public space. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’11. ACM, pp 49–52. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979595
  14. 14.
    Heller F, Knott T, Weiss M, Borchers J (2009) Multi-user interaction in virtual audio spaces. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’09. ACM, pp 4489–4494Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacquemin C, Chan WK, Courgeon M (2010) Bateau ivre: an artistic markerless outdoor mobile augmented reality installation on a riverboat. In: Proceedings of the MM ’10. ACM, pp 1353–1362. doi:10.1145/1873951.1874218
  16. 16.
    Jacucci C, Jacucci G, Wagner I, Psik T (2005) A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In: Proceedings of the CC ’05. ACM, pp 19–28. doi:10.1145/1094562.1094566
  17. 17.
    Jacucci G, Peltonen P, Morrison A, Salovaara A, Kurvinen E, Oulasvirta A (2010) Ubiquitous media for collocated interaction. In: Shared encounters, CSCW. Springer, London, pp 23–45. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-727-1_2
  18. 18.
    Jones M (2011) Journeying toward extravagant, expressive, place-based computing. Interactions 18(1):26–31. doi:10.1145/1897239.1897247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawsar F, Rukzio E, Kortuem G (2010) An explorative comparison of magic lens and personal projection for interacting with smart objects. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’10, pp 157–160. doi:10.1145/1851600.1851627
  20. 20.
    Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2011) Electronic mobile guides: a survey. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 15(1):97–111. doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0295-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    KewGardens: Kew gardens mobile application. http://www.kew.org/visit-kew-gardens/visit-information/garden-guides/mobile-app/. Accessed 15 May 2013
  22. 22.
    Lab GR L.A.S.E.R. tag. http://www.graffitiresearchlab.com/blog/projects/laser-tag/. Accessed 15 Aug 2013
  23. 23.
    Lozano-Hemmer R Projection artworks. http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/projects.php?keyword=projection. Accessed 15 Aug 2013
  24. 24.
    Lucero A, Jones M, Jokela T, Robinson S (2013) Mobile collocated interactions: taking an offline break together. Interactions 20(2):26–32. doi:10.1145/2427076.2427083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marentakis GN, Brewster SA (2006) Effects of feedback, mobility and index of difficulty on deictic spatial audio target acquisition in the horizontal plane. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’06. ACM, pp 359–368. doi:10.1145/1124772.1124826
  26. 26.
    McGookin D, Vazquez-Alvarez Y, Brewster S, Bergstrom-Lehtovirta J (2012) Shaking the dead: multimodal location based experiences for un-stewarded archaeological sites. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ’12. ACM, pp 199–208. doi:10.1145/2399016.2399048
  27. 27.
    Morrison A, Oulasvirta A, Peltonen P, Lemmela S, Jacucci G, Reitmayr G, Näsänen J, Juustila A (2009) Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’09. ACM, pp 1889–1898. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518991
  28. 28.
    Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’05. ACM, pp 741–750. doi:10.1145/1054972.1055074
  29. 29.
    Reid J, Geelhoed E, Hull R, Cater K, Clayton B (2005) Parallel worlds: immersion in location-based experiences. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’05. ACM, pp 1733–1736. doi:10.1145/1056808.1057009
  30. 30.
    Reid J, Hull R, Cater K, Clayton B (2004) Riot! 1831: the design of a location based audio drama. In: Proceedings of the UK-UbiNet ’04, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rico J, Brewster S (2010) Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’10. ACM, pp 887–896. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753458
  32. 32.
    Rico J, Jacucci G, Reeves S, Hansen LK, Brewster S (2010) Designing for performative interactions in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp ’10 Adjunct. ACM, pp 519–522. doi:10.1145/1864431.1864503
  33. 33.
    Rogers Y, Price S, Fitzpatrick G, Fleck R, Harris E, Smith H, Randell C, Muller H, O’Malley C, Stanton D, Thompson M, Weal M (2004) Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In: Proceedings of the IDC ’04. ACM, pp 3–10. doi:10.1145/1017833.1017834
  34. 34.
    Rouillard J, Laroussi M (2008) PerZoovasive: contextual pervasive qr codes as tool to provide an adaptive learning support. In: Proceedings of the CSTST ’08, pp 542–548Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rueb T Core sample. http://www.terirueb.net/core_sample/index.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2013
  36. 36.
    Sauter D (2006) Light attack. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Art gallery. ACM. doi:10.1145/1178977.1179087
  37. 37.
    Scheible J, Ojala T (2009) Mobispray: mobile phone as virtual spray can for painting big anytime anywhere on anything. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Art Gallery. ACM, pp 5:1–5:10. doi:10.1145/1667265.1667271
  38. 38.
    Stahl C (2007) The roaring navigator: a group guide for the zoo with shared auditory landmark display. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’07. ACM, pp 383–386. doi:10.1145/1377999.1378042
  39. 39.
    Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Wallace J, Wright P, Boulanger P, Olivier P (2011) Designing from within: humanaquarium. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’11. ACM, pp 1855–1864. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979211
  40. 40.
    Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K, Häkkilä J, Cassinelli A, Müller J, Rukzio E, Schmidt A (2013) Experiencing interactivity in public spaces (eips). In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’13. ACM, pp 3275–3278. doi:10.1145/2468356.2479665
  41. 41.
    Vlahakis V, Karigiannis J, Tsotros M, Gounaris M, Almeida L, Stricker D, Gleue T, Christou IT, Carlucci R, Ioannidis N (2001) Archeoguide: first results of an augmented reality, mobile computing system in cultural heritage sites. In: Proceedings of the VAST ’01. ACM, pp 131–140. doi:10.1145/584993.585015
  42. 42.
    Wecker AJ, Lanir J, Kuflik T, Stock O (2011) Pathlight: supporting navigation of small groups in the museum context. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’11. ACM, pp 569–574. doi:10.1145/2037373.2037462
  43. 43.
    Williamson JR (2011) Send me bubbles: multimodal performance and social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’11. ACM, pp 899–904. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979513
  44. 44.
    Williamson JR, Hansen LK (2012) Designing performative interactions in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the DIS ’12. ACM, pp 791–792. doi:10.1145/2317956.2318076

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liam Betsworth
    • 1
  • Huw Bowen
    • 2
  • Simon Robinson
    • 1
  • Matt Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Future Interaction Technology LabSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.History and ClassicsSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations