Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 1583–1600 | Cite as

Nightingallery: theatrical framing and orchestration in participatory performance

  • Robyn Taylor
  • Guy Schofield
  • John Shearer
  • Peter Wright
  • Pierre Boulanger
  • Patrick Olivier
Original Article

Abstract

The Nightingallery project encouraged participants to converse, sing, and perform with a musically responsive animatronic bird, playfully interacting with the character while members of the public could look on and observe. We used Nightingallery to frame an HCI investigation into how people would engage with one another when confronted with unfamiliar technologies in conspicuously public, social spaces. Structuring performances as improvisational street theatre, we styled our method of exhibiting the bird character. We cast ourselves in supporting roles as carnival barkers and minders of the bird, presenting him as if he were a fantastical creature in a fairground sideshow display, allowing him the agency to shape and maintain dialogues with participants, and positioning him as the focal character upon which the encounter was centred. We explored how the anthropomorphic nature of the bird itself, along with the cultural connotations associated with the carnival/sideshow tradition helped signpost and entice participants through the trajectory of their encounters with the exhibit. Situating ourselves as secondary characters within the narrative defining the performance/use context, our methods of mediation, observation, and evaluation were integrated into the performance frame. In this paper, we explore recent HCI theories in mixed reality performance to reflect upon how genre-based cultural connotations can be used to frame trajectories of experience, and how manipulation of roles and agency in participatory performance can facilitate HCI investigation of social encounters with playful technologies.

Keywords

Digital arts HCI Participatory performance Theatrical approaches Practice-based research Research in the wild Interdisciplinary design 

References

  1. 1.
    Benford S, Crabtree A, Reeves S, Sheridan J, Dix A, Flintham M, Drozd A (2006) The frame of the game: blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 427–436Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benford S, Fraser M, Reynard G, Koleva B, Drozd A (2002) Staging and evaluating public performances as an approach to CVE research. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Collaborative virtual environments, CVE’02, pp 80–87Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bevilacqua F, Fels S, Jensenius AR, Lyons MJ, Schnell N, Tanaka A (2013) SIG NIME: music, technology, and human–computer interaction. In CHI EA’13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalsgaard P, Hansen LK (2008) Performing perception: staging aesthetics of interaction. ToCHi: transactions of computer–human interaction, 15:3–4, 13.11–13.33Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    England D, Fantauzzacoffin J, Schiphorst T, Latulipe C, Candy L (2013) Digital art: challenging perspectives. In: CHI EA’13Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaver W (2007) Cultural commentators: non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(4):292–305MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunning T (1989) An aesthetic of astonishment: early film and the incredulous spectator. Art Text 34:31–45Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Höök K, Sengers P, Andersson G (2003) Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art. In:Proc CHI’03, pp 241–248Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacucci C, Jacucci G, Wagner I, Psik T (2005) A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC ‘05), NY, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacucci J, Spagnolli A, Chalambalakis A, Morrison A, Liikkanen L, Roveda S, Bertoncini M (2009) Bodily Explorations in space: social experience of a multimodal art installation. In Proceedings of INTERACT ‘09, 62–75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lightman B (2007) Victorian popularizers of science: designing nature for new audiences. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Munster A (2006) Materializing new media: embodiment in information aesthetics (interfaces: studies in visual culture), Dartmouth College Press, Hanover, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Penny S, Smith J, Sengers P, Bernhardt A, Schulte J (2001) Traces: embodied immersive interaction with semi-autonomous avatars. Convergence 7(2):47Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reeves S (2011) Designing interfaces in public settings: understanding the role of the spectator in human–computer interaction (1st ed.). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In Proc CHI’05, pp 741–750Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schechner R (1988) Performance theory. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schechner R (2002) Performance studies: an introduction. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schiphorst T (2011) Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In CHI EA’11, pp 145–160Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schnädelbach H, Egglestone SR, Reeves S, Benford S, Walker B, Wright M (2008) Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides. In Proceedings of CHI ‘08, pp 1167–1176Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, DIS’06, pp 99–108, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheridan JG (2006) Digital live art: mediating wittingness in playful arenas. PhD Thesis. Computing Department, Lancaster University, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheridan JG, Bryan-Kinns N (2008) Designing for performative tangible interaction. Int J Arts Technol 1(3/4):288–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheridan J, Bryan-Kinns N, Reeves S, Marshall J, Lane G (2011) Graffito: crowd-based performative interaction at festivals. In Proc. CHI’11 Extended Abstracts, pp 1129–1134Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheridan J, Dix A, Lock S, Bayliss A (2004) Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. In Proc HCI pp 3–18, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tanenbaum J, Tanenbaum K, Wakkary R (2012) Steampunk as design fiction. In Proc. CHI ‘12, pp 1583–1592Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taylor R, Boulanger P, Olivier P, Wallace J (2009) Exploring participatory performance to inform the design of collaborative public interfaces. CHI Extended Abs 3721–3726Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Boulanger P, Wallace J, Wright P, Olivier P (2011) Designing from within: humanaquarium. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘11). ACM, New York, pp 1855–1864Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Boulanger P, Wallace J, Wright P, Olivier P (2011) Composing for the interactive medium. In the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Virtual Reality, LavalGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tennent P, Martindale S, Marshall J, Reeves S, Walker B, Harter P (2012) Performing the experiment live, Proceedings of ACM CHI Workshop on Exploring CHI’s Relationship with Liveness, AustinGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wright P, Blythe M, McCarthy J (2006) User experience and the idea of design in HCI. Interactive Systems, 12th (LNCS):1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Taylor
    • 1
  • Guy Schofield
    • 1
  • John Shearer
    • 1
  • Peter Wright
    • 1
  • Pierre Boulanger
    • 2
  • Patrick Olivier
    • 1
  1. 1.Culture Lab, School of Computing ScienceNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Advanced Man-Machine Interface Laboratory, Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations