Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 465–478 | Cite as

Discipline-based instruction to promote interdisciplinary design of wearable and pervasive computing products

  • Tom Martin
  • Kahyun Kim
  • Jason Forsyth
  • Lisa McNair
  • Eloise Coupey
  • Ed Dorsa
Original Article


This paper reports on a design experience for undergraduates in computer engineering, industrial design, and marketing that focuses on pervasive computing devices. Across a broad range of targeted application areas and user groups, many of the student designs have been wearable computers. Consequently, our course will be of interest to the wearable computing community, particularly in terms of our aim of bridging the gap between design and engineering. For the two most recent offerings of the course, we have utilized external observers and surveyed the students in order to validate the impact of aspects of our process and changes to it. This paper is based upon 5 years of experience and 2 years of analysis of our course, and it presents an overview of our process with both qualitative and quantitative results from these two most recent offerings.


Interdisciplinary design teams Pervasive computing design 


  1. 1.
    Buxton B (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cagan J, Vogel C (2002) Creating breakthrough products. Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelley T, Littman J (2001) The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO. America’s Leading Design Firm, DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moggridge B (2007) Designing interactions. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gemperle F, Kasabach C, Stivoric J, Bauer M, Martin R (1998) Design for wearability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 116–122Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCann J, Hurford R, Martin A (2005) A design process for the development of innovative smart clothing that addresses end-user needs from technical, functional, aesthetic and cultural view points. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, Osaka, Japan, pp 70–77Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papadopoulos D (2007) Natural language, connectors, and fraying threads. In: Proceedings of the workshop on the role of design in wearable computing. Boston, MA, pp 21–27Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smailagic A, Siewiorek D, Anderson D, Kasabach C, Martin T, Stivoric J (1995) Benchmarking an interdisciplinary concurrent design methodology for electronic/mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of 32nd design automation conference, San Francisco, CA, pp 514–519Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siewiorek D, Smailagic A (2002) User-centered interdisciplinary design of wearable computers. In: Sears A, Jacko JA (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, pp 635–655Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stake R (1995) The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin R (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wageman R, Hackman J, Lehman E (2005) Team diagnostic survey: development of an instrument. J Appl Behav Sci 41:373–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brice Heath S, Street B, with Mills M (2008) On ethnography: approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin T (ed) (2007) Proceedings of the workshop on the role of design in wearable computing, Boston, MA. Accessed 18 Nov 2011
  15. 15.
    Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coupey E, Dorsa E, Kemnitzer R, McNair L, Martin T (2010) A case study of an interdisciplinary course for pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on pervasive computing education, PerEd 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark. Accessed 18 Nov 2011
  17. 17.
    ABC News (1999) Nightline–the deep dive, first aired 13 July 1999Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Igoe T (2007) Making things talk: practical methods for connecting physical objects. O’Reilly Media, SebastopolGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buechley L (2006) A construction kit for electronic textiles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on wearable computers. Montreux, Switzerland, pp 83–90Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dow S, Saponas T, Li Y, Landay J (2006) External representations in ubiquitous computing design and the implications for design tools. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems. New York, pp 241–250Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hohmann L (2007) Innovation games. Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    LUMA Institute (2011) LUMA Institute. Last accessed 18 Nov 2011
  23. 23.
    Kim K, McNair L, Coupey E, Martin T, Dorsa E, Kemnitzer R (2010) Situativity approaches for improving interdisciplinary team processes. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE southeast section conference, Blacksburg, VA. Accessed 18 Nov 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Martin
    • 1
  • Kahyun Kim
    • 1
  • Jason Forsyth
    • 1
  • Lisa McNair
    • 1
  • Eloise Coupey
    • 1
  • Ed Dorsa
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations