Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 107–126 | Cite as

Designing motivation using persuasive ambient mirrors

Original Article

Abstract

In this article, we describe four case studies of ubiquitous persuasive technologies that support behavior change through personalized feedback reflecting a user’s current behavior or attitude. The first case study is Persuasive Art, reflecting the current status of a user’s physical exercise in artistic images. The second system, Virtual Aquarium, reflects a user’s toothbrushing behavior in a Virtual Aquarium. The third system, Mona Lisa Bookshelf, reflects the situation of a shared bookshelf on a Mona Lisa painting. The last case study is EcoIsland, reflecting cooperative efforts toward reducing CO2 emissions as a set of virtual islands shared by a neighborhood. Drawing from the experience of designing and evaluating these systems, we present guidelines for the design of persuasive ambient mirrors: systems that use visual feedback to effect changes in users’ everyday living patterns. In particular, we feature findings in choosing incentive systems, designing emotionally engaging feedback, timing feedback, and persuasive interaction design. Implications for current design efforts as well as for future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

Persuasive technology Interaction design Gamification 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander T (ed) (2005) Massively multiplayer game development 2. Charles River Media, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Marsh T, Islam N, Zakeri I, Honess-Morreale L, Demoor C (2003) Squire’s quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. Am J Prev Med 24(1):52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartle R (2003) Designing virtual worlds. New Riders Games, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bang M, Torstensson C, Katzeff C (2006) The powerhhouse: a persuasive computer game designed to raise awareness of domestic energy consumption. Persuasive Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3962. Springer, pp 123–132Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berdichevsky D, Neuenschwander E (1999) Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun ACM 42(5):51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergeron B (2006) Developing serious games. Charles River Media, HinghamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blauvelt A (2003) Strangely familiar: design and everyday life. Walker Art Center, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castronova E (2007) Exodus to the virtual world: how online fun is changing reality. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang Y-C, Lo J-L, Huang C-J, Hsu N-Y, Chu H–H, Wang H-Y, Chi P-Y, Hsieh Y-L (2008) Playful toothbrush: UbiComp technology for teaching tooth brushing to kindergarten children. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen J-H, Chi PP-Y, Chu H–H, Chen CC-H, Huang P (2010) A smart kitchen for nutrition-aware cooking. IEEE Pervas Comput 9:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu M-C, Chang S-P, Chang Y-C, Chu H–H, Chen CC-H, Hsiao F-H, Ko J-C (2009) Playful Bottle: a mobile social persuasion system to motivate healthy water intake. In: Proceedings of ACM Ubicomp 2009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheok AD, Kok RT, Tan C, Fernando ONN, Merritt T, Sen JYP (2008) Empathetic living media. In: Proceedings of ACM designing interactive systems ‘08Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Consolvo S, Klasnja P, McDonald DW, Avrahami D, Froehlich J, LeGrand L, Libby R, Mosher K, Landay JA (2008) Flowers or a robot army? Encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. In: Proceedings of ACM Ubicomp 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demir E, Desmet PMA, Hekkert PPM (2009) Appraisal patterns of emotions in human-product interaction. Int J Des 3(2):41–51Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dillahunt T, Becker G, Mankoff J, Kraut R (2008) Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. In: Pervasive 2008 workshop proceedings, Sydney, Australia, May 19–22, pp 58–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eyck A, Geerlings K, Karimova D, Meerbeek B, Wang L, Ijsselsteijn W et al. (2006) Effect of a virtual coach on athletes’ motivation. In: Proceedings of the conference on persuasive technology (PERSUASIVE 2006). Springer, Berlin, pp 158–161Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferscha A (2007) A matter of taste. In: Proceedings of European conference on ambient intelligence 2007Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fogg BJ, Iizawa D (2008) Online persuasion in facebook and mixi: a cross-cultural comparison. In: Proceedings of the Persuasive 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fredrikson BL (2003) The value of positive emotions: the emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it’s good to feel good. Am Sci 91:330–335Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Froehlich J, Dillahunt T, Klasnja P, Mankoff J, Consolvo S, Harrison B, Landay JA (2009) Ubigreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In: CHI’09: proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, pp 1043–1052Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fujinami K, Kawsar F, Nakajima T (2005) AwareMirror: a personalized display using a mirror. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on pervasive computingGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fujinami K, Riekki J (2008) A case study on an ambient display as a persuasive medium for exercise awareness. In: Proceedings of persuasive technology 2008Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gamification 101: An introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior, White paper, Bunchball Inc, 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gasser R, Brodbeck D, Degen M, Luthiger J, Wyss R, Reichlin S (2006) Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. In: Proceedings of persuasive technology 2006Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Galernter D (1991) Mirror world: or the day software puts the universe in a shoe box. How it will happen and what it will mean. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gaver W, Bowers J, Kerridge T, Boucher A, Jarvis N (2009) Anatomy of failure, how we knew when our design went wrong and what we learned from it. In: CHI 2009Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Graham C, Benda P, Howard S, Balmford J, Bishop N, Borland R (2006) heh—keeps me off the smokes..: probing technology support for personal change. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computer-human interaction (OZCHI 2006), pp 221–228Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hallnas L, Redstrom J (2001) Slow technology—designing for reflection. In: Personal and ubiqutious computing, vol 5, No. 3, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ham J, Midden C, Beute F (2009) Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously? Using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, persuasive’09, pp 29:1–29:6Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hayes A, Ulinski A, Hodges L (2010) That avatar is looking at me! social inhibition in virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent virtual agents (IVA’10)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    He HA, Greenberg S, Huang EM (2010) One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—ACM CHI’2010. ACM Press, pp 927–936Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hekkert P, Schifferstein HNJ (2007) Product experience. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holmquist LE, Skog T (2003) Informative art: information visualization in everyday environments. In: Proceedings of GRAPHITE ‘03Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hopson J (2001) Behavioral game design. Gamasutra, April 27, 2001 [online February 27, 2007], Available from: http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20010427/hopson_01.htm
  37. 37.
    Intille SS, Nawyn J, Larson K (2006) Embedding behavior modification strategies into a consumer electronics device. In: Proceedings of UbicompGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jafarinaimi N, Forlizzi J, Hurst A, Zimmerman J (2005) Breakway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jordan PW (2002) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kawsar F, Fujinami K, Nakajima T (2007) Experiences with building intelligent environment through sentient artefacts. In: The 3rd IET international conference on intelligent environment (IE07)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kawsar F, Fujinami K, Nakajima T (2008) Deploy spontaneously: supporting end-users in building and enhancing a smart home. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp’08Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khaled R, Fischer R, Noble J, Biddle R (2008) A qualitative study of culture and persuasion in a smoking cessation game. In: Proceedings of persuasive technology 2008Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Khan O, Canny J (2008) Promoting environmentally sustainable behaviors using social marketing in emerging persuasive technologies. In: Pervasive 2008, workshop proceedings, Sydney, Australia, May 19–22, pp 75–78Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kimura H, Nakajima T (2011) Designing persuasive applications to motivate sustainable behavior in collective cultures. Psychol J 9(1):7–28Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Krippendorff K (2005) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lehdonvirta V (2009) Virtual consumption. Publications of the Turku School of Economics, A-11:2009. ISBN: 978-952-249-019-3Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lehdonvirta V, Ernkvist M (2011) Knowledge map of the virtual economy. World Bank, Washington. http://www.infodev.org/en/Document.1056.pdf
  49. 49.
    Levitt S, Dubner SJ (2005) Freakonoic: a rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lin JJ, Mamykina L, Lindtner S, Delajoux G, Strub HB (2006) Fish’n’Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In: Proceedings of UbiComp ‘06Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    List of diet and nutrition software for Palm [online, February 27, 2007], http://www.handango.com/SoftwareCatalog.jsp?siteId=1&platformId=1&N=96804+95712
  52. 52.
    List of quit smoking meters [online, February 27, 2007], http://www.ciggyfree.com/ODAT/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=25
  53. 53.
    Mankoff J, Dey AK, Hsieh G, Kientz J, Lederer S, Ames M (2003) Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mankoff J, Matthews D, Fussell SR, Johnson M (2007) Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. In: Proceedings of the HICSS ‘07Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Midden C, Kaiser FG, McCalley LT (2007) Technology’s four roles in understanding individuals’ conservation of natural resources. J Soc Issues 63(1):155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Midden C, Ham J (2009) using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In: Proceedings of persuasive technologies 2009Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Midden C, Ham J, Kleepe M, Kimura H, Nakajima T (2011) Persuasive power in groups: the influence of group feedback and individual comparison feedback on energy consumption behavior. The sixth international conference on persuasive technologyGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Moere AV (2009) Beyond ambient display: a contextual taxonomy of alternative information display. Int J Ambient Comput Intell 1(2):39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Montola M, Stenros J, Waern A (2009) Pervasive games: theory and design. Morgan Kaufmann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mugge R, Schoormans JPL, Schifferstein HNJ (2007) Product attachment: design strategies to stimulate the emotional bonding with products. In: Product experience. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nakajima T, Lehdonvirta V, Tokunaga E, Kimura H (2008) Reflecting human behavior to motivate desirable lifestyle. In: Proceedings of ACM designing interactive systems ‘08Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Petty RE, Wegener DT (1999) The Ebaboration Likelyhood Model: Current Status and Controversies. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds) Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilfond Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pousman Z, Stasko J (2006) A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. In: Proceeding of international conference on advanced visual interfaces 2006Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Reeves B, Read LJ (2009) Total engagement: using games and virtual worlds to change the way people work and businesses compete. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Reeve J (2005) Understanding motivation and emotion, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schmidt A, Kranz M, Holleis P (2005) Interacting with the ubiquitous computer: towards embedding interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies (sOc-EUSAI ‘05). ACM, New York, pp 147–152Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schwarz N, Clore GL (2000) Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles, 2nd edn, pp 385–407Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sengers P, Gaver B (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on designing interactive systems (DIS 2006)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Shiraishi M, Washio Y, Takayama C, Lehdonvirta V, Kimura H, Nakajima T (2009) Using individual, social and economic persuasion techniques to reduce CO2 emissions in a family setting. In: Persuasive technologies 2009Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Suri JF (2005) Thoughtless acts? Chronicle Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Toscos T, Faber A, An S, Gandhi MP (2006) Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. In: CHI’06: CHI’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1873–1878Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL, Norman GJ, Redding CA (1998) Smoking cessation and stress management: applications of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Homeostasis 38:216–236Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wright P, McCarthy J (2008) Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wright P, Wallace J, McCarthy J (2008) Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 15(4):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yamabe T, Lehdonvirta V, Ito H, Soma H, Kimura H, Nakajima T (2009) Applying pervasive technologies to create economic incentives that alter consumer behavior. In: Proceedings of ACM Ubicomp 2009Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yamabe T (2011) A system framework for decision support in ambient intelligence. Doctoral Dissertation, Waseda UniversityGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yoshii A, Funabashi Y, Kimura H, Nakajima T (2011) iDetective: a location based game to persuade users unconsciously. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEEE conference on embedded and real-tie computing systems ad applicationsGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zichermann G, Linder J (2010) Game-based marketing: inspire customer loyalty through rewards, challenges, and contests. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Helsinki Institute for Information TechnologyAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations