Advertisement

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 929–941 | Cite as

Variable elasticity spring-relaxation: improving the accuracy of localization for WSNs with unknown path loss exponent

  • Qing Zhang
  • Chuan Heng Foh
  • Boon-Chong Seet
  • A. C. M. Fong
Original Article

Abstract

Wireless sensor network is a key enabling technology for Ambient Intelligence, where location information is crucial for many applications. RSS-based ranging localization takes advantage of its low cost and low complexity, but it has an infeasible assumption of an accurate path loss exponent of the physical environment. In this paper, we study the impact of path loss exponent accuracy on the localization accuracy. We formulate the relationship between the path loss exponent estimate and localization error, and found the localization error of exponential order which we call the error magnification effect. By our in-depth investigation, we propose a passive and an active measures to suppress the error magnification effect, where the passive measure stabilizes the localization error of the spring-relaxation algorithm (SR), and the active measure introduces variable elasticity into the SR algorithm to cancel off the exponential ranging error. The combination of both measures forms our localization solution called variable elasticity spring-relaxation (VE-SR) localization. We conduct extensive simulation experiments to show the effectiveness of VE-SR in suppressing the error magnification effect in various experiment setup. For a wide variety of physical environments, VE-SR offers location estimation with an average accuracy of no more than 10% of transmission range.

Keywords

Error magnification effect Variable elasticity spring-relaxation Sensor localization Unknown path loss exponent 

References

  1. 1.
    Augusto JC, Nakashima H, Aghajan H (2010) Ambient intelligence and smart environments: a state of the art. In: Nakashima H, Aghajan H, Augusto JC (eds) Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook DJ, Augusto JC, Jakkula VR (2009) Ambient intelligence: technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive Mob Comput 5(4):277–298. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2009.04.001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7MF1-4W2W5PH-1/2/7ac602bb16ca409e2f70c13aa24ae0d5
  3. 3.
    Benini L, Farella E, Guiducci C (2006) Wireless sensor networks: enabling technology for ambient intelligence. Microelectron J 37(12):1639–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.mejo.2006.04.021. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V44-4KXF31P-1/2/fbab6ac1109d80a378520e2883778072 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casari P, Castellani AP, Cenedese A, Lora C, Rossi M, Schenato L, Zorzi M (2009) The wireless sensor networks for city-wide ambient intelligence (WISE-WAI) project. Sensors 9:4056–4082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fang SH, Lin TN, Lin PC (2008) Location fingerprinting in a decorrelated space. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 20(5):685–691. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190731 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li X (2006) RSS-based location estimation with unknown pathloss model. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 5(12):3626–3633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN (2000) RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In: INFOCOM’00: proceedings of the 19th annual joint conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, vol 2, pp 775–784Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lorincz K, Welsh M (2007) MoteTrack: a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11(6):489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savarese C, Rabaey JM, Langendoen K (2002) Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the general track of the annual conference on USENIX annual technical conference, pp 317–327. USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=647057.713854
  10. 10.
    Niculescu D, Nath B (2003) DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Telecommun Syst 22(1–4):267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savvides A, Park H, Srivastava MB (2002) The bits and flops of the n-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Wireless sensor networks and applications, WSNA’02, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 112–121. doi: 10.1145/570738.570755
  12. 12.
    Priyantha N, Balakrishnan H, Demaine E, Teller S (2003) Anchor-free distributed localization in sensor networks. Technical report. MIT Laboratory for Computer ScienceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Q, Foh CH, Seet BC, Fong ACM (2010) Location estimation in wireless sensor networks using spring-relaxation technique. Sensors 10(5):5171–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rappaport TS (2002) Wireless communications: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTRGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zigbee specifications, version 1.0 r13 (2006). http://www.zigbee.org
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez J, Krause A, Chen K, Guestri C Link quality estimation. http://www.select.cs.cmu.edu/data/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qing Zhang
    • 1
  • Chuan Heng Foh
    • 1
  • Boon-Chong Seet
    • 2
  • A. C. M. Fong
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Computing and Mathematical SciencesAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations