Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 539–550 | Cite as

The interior spatial environment: dynamic 0g environments and human places

Original Article


In outer space, human experiences interject with technology in ways not experienced on Earth. We will examine the human aspects of living both on Earth and in the interior 0g environment, how technology interacts with astronauts, and how the design of the interior environments in outer space considers the interaction of technology and humanity from an astronaut’s perspective. These issues are explored with Marc Garneau, the first Canadian astronaut in outer space, and Travis Baldwin, 0g environment designer, who has worked with astronauts in the USA. Both discuss the complexity of living in space and how the ways that we live on Earth in terms of interior spatial environment characteristics might be interesting to consider. Within interior environments on Earth, function is always affected and mediated by social and dynamic human relationships and people’s experience and perceptions. When these experiences are transferred into the 0g environment, small, confined, and highly technological environments augment and intensify human relations. And yet these are rarely considered in the quest for secure, functional environments in space transport or on stations. These issues are discussed from both theoretical and practical perspectives in conversation with Garneau and Baldwin. In the interview with Marc Garneau, the author validates certain theoretical assumptions about the complex and dynamic interactions that occur in space, understanding the ways that astronauts cope in space and become creative in figuring out how to “mold” the environment to become their own, and what design factors are important to consider. Finally, examples of potential design ideas for integrating and humanizing the interior 0g space environment are explored and ideas about how to integrate human social elements are proposed.


  1. 1.
    Allaway H (1981) The space shuttle at work. NASA Scientific and Information Branch, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Checkley R (1978) Futuropolis. A & W Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke AC (2001) Beyond gravity. National Geographic, January 2001, Washington, DC, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csikzentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E (1981) The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gatland K (ed) (1981) Space technology: a comprehensive history of space exploration. Harmony Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner H (1983) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gardner H (1982) Art, mind, and brain: a cognitive approach to creativity. Basic Books, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison H, Edwards M (1979) Spacecraft: in fact and fiction. Orbis Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffmann C (2007) The new space race. Wired 144–153Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson RD, Holbrow C (eds) (1977) Space settlements: a design study. NASA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kratzenberg-Annies V, the European Space agency (2005) Space: a journey of discovery. Harry S. Abrams, INC, Publishers, Trieste, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberman J (1991) Light: medicine of the Future. Bear & Company, RochesterGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Long ME (2001) Surviving in space. National Geographic, January 2001, Washington, DC, pp 6–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahnke F (1996) Color, environment and human response: an interdisciplinary understanding of color and it use as a beneficial element in the design of the architectural environment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCullough M (2004) Digital ground: architecture, pervasive computing and environmental knowing. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merleau-Ponty M (1945/1958) Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Model One Space Station, source unknownGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pallasmaa J (1990) The eyes of the skin; architecture of the senses. Academy Editions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Panero J, Zelnik M (1979) Human dimension & interior space: a source book of design reference standards. Whitney Library of Design, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pheasant S (1986) Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and design. Taylor & Spalding, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poldma T (2008) Dwelling futures and lived experiences: transforming interior spaces. Issue 2,
  23. 23.
    Poldma T, Samuelson H (2003) The user-product-technology interface: interior design and the virtual and physical experiences of spaces. In: Conference proceedings of the cost 269 conference: the good bad irrelevant: the user and future of information and communication technologies, Media Lab UIAH, Helsinki, Finland, pp 285–289Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poldma T, Wesolkowska M (2005) Globalization and changing concepts of time-space: a paradigm shift for interior design? In-form5, The Journal of Architecture, Design and Material Culture, vol 5, a global view of interior design, pp 54–61Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steeves HP (2006) The things themselves; phenomenology of the everyday. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Szenazy S (2005) Thinking about human-centered design: interior design’s impact on the elderly, the environment and outer space. In-form5, The Journal of Architecture, Design and Material Culture, vol 5, a global view of interior design, pp 39–42Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor LB Jr (1974) For all mankind. E. P. Dutton & Co., Ltd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vaikla T (1982) Phoenix one: a space station concept. Unpublished bachelor thesis, Ryerson University, Vaikla, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaikla-Poldma T (2003) An investigation of learning and teaching processes in an interior design class: an interpretive and contextual inquiry. Unpublished doctoral thesis, McGill University, Vaikla-Poldma, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vernikos J, NASA (2001) The body in space. In: Long MJ Surviving in space. National Geographic, pp 6–29Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zuboff S (1984) In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. Basic Books Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar


  1. 32.
    Garneau M (2011) Conversation/interview with Tiiu Poldma about living in space as an astronaut. MontrealGoogle Scholar
  2. 33.
    Baldwin T (2009) Conversations about 0g environment and design with Tiiu Poldma. Montreal and San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  3. 34.
    O’Neill G (1981) 2081: a hopeful view of the human future. Simon & Shuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations