Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 479–486 | Cite as

The challenges and opportunities of designing pervasive systems for deep-space colonies

Original Article

References

  1. 1.
    Manzey D (2004) Human missions to Mars: new psychological challenges and research issues. Acta Astronautica 55(3–9):781–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B (1998) Mental performance during short-term and long-term spaceflight. Brain Res Rev 28:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Heuer H, Sangals J (2000) Impairments of manual tracking performance in space: more converging evidence from a 20-day space mission. Ergonomics 43:589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Polyakov VV (1998) Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day space mission. Ergonomics 41:537–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Schiewe A, Finell G, Thiele G (1993) Behavioral aspects of human adaptation to space: analyses of cognitive and psychomotor performance during an 8-days space mission. Clin Investig 71:725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Gushin V, Weiss DS, Grund EM, Flynn C, Kozerenko O, Sled A, Marmar CR (2001) Asthenia: does it exist in Space? Psychosom Med 63:874–880Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palinkas LA, Browner D (1995) Effects of prolonged isolation in extreme environments on stress, coping, and depression. J Appl Soc Psychol 25:557–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palinkas LA, Johnson JC, Boster JS, Houseal M (1998) Longitudinal studies of behavior and performance during a winter at the South Pole. Aviat Space Environ Med 69:73–77Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Grund EM, Gushin V, Weiss DS, Kozerenko O, Sled A, Marmar CR (2000) Interpersonal and cultural issues involving crews and ground personnel during Shuttle/Mir space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 71:11–16Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandal G (2001) Crew tension during a space station simulation. Environ Behav 33:134–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandal G, Vaernes R, Ursin H (1995) Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 66:617–624Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grigoriev AI, Kozerenko OP, Myasnikov VI (1987) Selected problems of psychological support of prolonged space flights. Proceedings of the 38th Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanas N (1991) Psychosocial support for cosmonauts. Aviat Space Environ Med 62:353–355Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Altshuller G (1999) The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center Inc, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whiteley I, Bogatyreva O, Johnson C, Wolff M, Townend M (2008) A Structured Approach to Scenario Generation for the Design of Crew Expert Tool. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS) Conference, ‘Building a safer space together’, 21–23 October 2008, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whiteley I, Bogatyreva O (2008) Human Moon and Mars Exploration Mission Challenges & Tools for Psychological Support. In: Proceedings of the 59th International Astronautical Congress, 29 September–3 October, 2008, Glasgow, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Polyakov V (1998) Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day spaceflight. Ergonomics 41:537–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanas N, Manzey D (2003) Space Psychology and Psychiatry, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-1341-8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whiteley I, Bogatyreva O, Johnson C, Wolff M, Townend M (2008) Human Mission to Mars: Designing a Crew Expert Tool for a Safety Critical Environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS) Conference, ‘Building a safer space together’, 21–23 October 2008, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Columbus Manual (2006) COL-RIBRE-MA-0045. Issue 4, December 2006. AstriumGmbH, BremenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hillier B, Burdett R, Peponis J, Penn A (1987) creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Archit Behav 3(3):233–250Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horneck G, Facius R, Reichert M, Rettberg P, Seboldt W, Manzey D, Comet B, Maillet A, Preiss H, Schauer L, Dussap CG, Poghon L, Belyavin A, Reitz G, Baumstark Khan C, Gerzer R, Humex A (2003) Study on the Survivability and Adaptation of Humans to Long-duration Exploratory Missions, (ESA SP-1274), European Space Agency, NoordwijkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zubrin R (2000) The Mars direct plan. Sci Am 282:34–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kostakos V, O’Neill E (2006) Interacting with mobile and pervasive systems. In: Ibrahim IK (ed) Handbook of research on mobile multimedia. Idea Group Inc, Hershey, pp 71–85, ISBN 1591408660Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Neill E, Kaenampornpan M, Kostakos V, Warr A, Woodgate D (2005) Can we do without GUIs? Gesture and speech interaction with a patient information system. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10(5):269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kostakos V, O’Neill E (2003) A directional stroke recognition technique for mobile interaction in a pervasive computing world. In: People and Computers XVII, proceedings of HCI 2003: Designing for Society. Springer, Bath, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grossman T, Kalakrishnan R (2008) Collaborative interaction with volumetric displays. CHI ’08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing system, pp 383–392Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kostakos V (2005) A design framework for pervasive computing systems. PhD Thesis, University of Bath, UK. Technical Report CSBU2005-02, ISSN 1740-9497Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kostakos V, O’Neill E, (2007) Quantifying the effects of space on encounter. In: Proceedings of Space Syntax Symposium 2007, Istanbul, pp 9701–9709Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steinicke F, Bruder G, Jerald J, Frenz H, Lappe M (2008) Analyses of human sensitivity to redirected walking. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Bordeaux, France, October 27–29, 2008). VRST ’08. ACM, New York, NY, pp 149–156Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Engel D, Curio C, Tcheang L, Mohler B, Bülthoff HH (2008) A psychophysically calibrated controller for navigating through large environments in a limited free-walking space. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Bordeaux, France, October 27–29, 2008). VRST ’08. ACM, New York, NY, pp 157–164Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chalmers M, Dieberger A, Höök K, Rudström Å (2004) Social navigation and seamful design. Cogn Stud Bull Jpn Cogn Sci Soc 11(3):71–181Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kunze K, Lukowicz P (2008) Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea, September 21–24, 2008) UbiComp ’08, vol 344. ACM, New York, NY, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Kasteren T, Noulas A, Englebienne G, Kröse B (2008) Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea, September 21–24, 2008) UbiComp ’08, vol 344. ACM, New York, NY, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pinhanez CS (2001) The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 30–October 02, 2001) Abowd GD, Brumitt B, Shafer SA (eds) Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol 2201. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 315–331Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kostakos V, Nicolai T, Yoneki E, O’Neill E, Kenn H, Crowcroft J (2008) Understanding and measuring the urban pervasive infrastructure. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer (online first)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    O’Neill E, Kostakos V, Kindberg T, Fatah gen. Schiek A, Penn A, Stanton Fraser D, Jones T (2006) Instrumenting the city: developing methods for observing and understanding the digital cityscape. In: Proceedings of UbiComp 2006, Lecture notes in Computer Science 4206, Springer, pp 315–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and EngineeringUniversity of MadeiraFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.Human Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations