Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 115–121 | Cite as

Electrostatic power harvesting for material computing

Original Paper


We describe a novel wearable energy-harvesting system based on the phenomenon of contact electrification: when two materials are brought into contact and then separated, they are often found to be charged. By patterning circuits out of textiles with specific electronic properties, we can collect and channel these transferred charges to power-harvesting circuitry. As a demonstration of this principle, we have designed and built a garment to display the wearer’s ongoing level of physical activity by powering strings of LEDs using only the energy generated in the garment’s motion. Finally, the methods we describe are not limited to textiles but are applicable to material computing in general.


  1. 1.
    Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104. September 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paradiso JA, Starner T (2005) Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics. IEEE Pervasive Comput 4(1):18–27Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Post ER, Orth M, Russo P, Gershenfeld N (2000) E-broidery: design and fabrication of textile-based computing. IBM Syst J 39(3–4):840–860. ISSN: 0018-8670Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buechley L, Eisenberg M (2007) Fabric pcbs, electronic sequins, and socket buttons: techniques for e-textile craft. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 13(2):133–150. ISSN: 1617-4909. doi:
  5. 5.
    Yang R, Qin Y, Li C, Zhu G, Wang GL (2009) Converting biomechanical energy into electricity by a muscle-movement-driven nanogenerator. Nano Lett 9(3):1201–1205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee MR, Eckert RD, Forberich K, Dennler G, Brabec CJ, Gaudiana RA (2009) Solar power wires based on organic photovoltaic materials. Science 324(5924):232–235MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yen BC, Lang JH (2006) A variable-capacitance vibration-to-electric energy harvester. Circuits Syst I Regul Pap IEEE Trans 53(2):288–295. ISSN: 1549-8328Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ida N (2004) Engineering electromagnetics, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 122–123Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Priestley J (1775) The history and present state of electricity: with original experiments, Printed for C. Bathurst, and T. Lowndes, p 89Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “tribo-, comb. form” The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. OED online. Oxford University Press. 4 Apr. 2000
  11. 11.
    Lowell J, Rose-Innes AC (1980) Contact electrification. Adv Phys 29(6):947–1023. 1980. ISSN: 0001-8732Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw PE, Jex CS (1928) Tribo-electricity and friction. iii. solid elements and textiles. Proc R Soc London Ser A 118(779):108–113. ISSN: 09501207Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailey AG (2001) The charging of insulator surfaces. J Electrostat 51–52:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Standard test method for evaluating triboelectric charge generation and decay. Kennedy Space Center, Spaceport Engineering & Technology Labs Division, November 15 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fluoropolymer comparison: typical properties, 2009. URL
  17. 17.
    Pratt TH (2000) Electrostatic ignitions of fires and explosions. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maccioni M, Orgiu E, Cosseddu P, Locci S, Bonfiglio A (2006) Towards the textile transistor: assembly and characterization of an organic field effect transistor with a cylindrical geometry. Appl Phys Lett 89(14) URL
  19. 19.
    Hamedi M, Forchheimer R, Inganas O (2007) Towards woven logic from organic electronic fibres. Nat Mater 6(5):357–362. URL Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee JB, Subramanian V (2005) Weave patterned organic transistors on fiber for e-textiles. Electron Dev IEEE Trans 52(2):269–275. URL

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asteism, IncCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.MIT Center for Bits and AtomsCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations