Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 153–169 | Cite as

Family memories in the home: contrasting physical and digital mementos

Original Article

Abstract

We carried out fieldwork to characterise and compare physical and digital mementos in the home. Physical mementos are highly valued, heterogeneous and support different types of recollection. Contrary to expectations, we found physical mementos are not purely representational, and can involve appropriating common objects and more idiosyncratic forms. In contrast, digital mementos were initially perceived as less valuable, although participants later reconsidered this. Digital mementos were somewhat limited in function and expression, largely involving representational photos and videos, and infrequently accessed. We explain these digital limitations and conclude with design guidelines for digital mementos, including better techniques for accessing and integrating these into everyday life, allowing them to acquire the symbolic associations and lasting value that characterise their physical counterparts.

Keywords

Autobiographical memory Home technology Mementos Field study 

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams D, Baecker R, Chignell M (1998) Information archiving with bookmarks: personal Web space construction and organization. In: CHI. ACM Press, New York, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beagrie N (2005) Plenty of room at the bottom? Personal digital libraries and collections. D-Lib Mag 11(6). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june05/beagrie/06beagrie.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2008
  3. 3.
    Belk R, Wallendorf M, Sherry J (1989) The sacred and the profane in consumer behaviour. J Consum Res 16(1):1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brewer WF (1986) What is autobiographical memory? In: Rubin D (ed) Autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–49Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brewer WF (1992) The theoretical and empirical status of the flashbulb memory hypothesis. In: Winograd E, Neisser U (eds) Affect and accuracy in recall: studies of “flashbulb” memories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 274–305Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalfen R (1987) Snapshot versions of life. The Popular Press, Bowling GreenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen G (1989) Everyday memory. In: Cohen G (ed) Memory in the real world. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conway M (1990) Autobiographical memory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conway M, Pleydell-Pearce C (2000) The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychol Rev 107(2):261–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crabtree A, RoddenT, Mariani J (2004) Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware. In CSCW ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New York, pp 396–405)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E (1981) The meaning of things—domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalsgaard T, Skov M, Stougaard M, Thomassen B (2006) Mediated intimacy in families: understanding the relation between children and parents. In: Proceedings of the conference interaction design and children—IDC’06, pp 145–152Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donath J, Boyd D (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Technol J 22(4):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dib L, Petrelli D, Whittaker S (2009) Sonic souvenirs: exploring the paradoxes of recorded sound for family remembering. In: Proceedings of CSCW ’10 conference on computer supported cooperative work (to appear)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fivush R, Nelson K (2004) Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 15(9):573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frohlich DM (2004) Audiophotography: bringing photos to life with sounds. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frohlich DM, Fennell J (2007) Sound, paper and memorabilia: resources for a simpler digital photography. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 11(2):107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frohlich DM, Kuchinsky A, Pering C, Don A, Ariss S (2002) Requirements for photoware. In: Proceedings of CSCW ’02. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frohlich D, Murphy R (2000) The memory box. Pers Technol 4:238–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenberg S, Nunes (2009) Sharing digital photographs in the home by tagging memorabilia. In: Extended Abstract CHI’09, pp 3533–3534Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonzalez J (1995) Autotopographies. In: Brahm G, Driscoll M (eds) Prosthetic territories—politics and hypertechnologies, pp 133–150Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graham A, Garcia-Molina H, Paepcke A, Winograd T (2002) Time as essence for photo browsing through personal digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the second ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL ‘02), Portland, Oregon, USA. ACM Press, New York, pp 326–335Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones W, Bruce H, Dumais S (2003) How do people get back to information on the Web? How can they do it better? In: INTERACT 2003. Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC13 international conference on human–computer interaction. 1–5 Sept 2003, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kawamura T, Fukuhara T, Takeda H, Kono J, Kidode Y (2007) Ubiquitous memories: a memory externalization system using physical objects—personal and ubiquitous computing. Pers Ubiquitous Technol 11:287–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kang H, Bederson B, Suh B (2007) Capture, annotate, browse, find, share: novel interfaces for personal photo management. Int J Hum Comput Interact 23(3):315–337Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kern N, Schiele B, Schmidt A (2007) Recognizing context for annotating a live life recording. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirk D, Sellen A, Rother C, Wood K (2006) Understanding photowork. In: CHI’06. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 761–770Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirk DS, Izadi S, Sellen A, Taylor S, Banks R, Hilliges O (2010) Opening up the family archive. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW 2010) (to appear)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Linton M (1986) Ways of searching and the contents of memory. In: Rubin D (ed) Autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 50–67Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leichtman M, Wang Q (2005) Autobiographical memory in the developmental niche: a cross-cultural perspective. In: Homer B, Tamis-LeMonda (eds) The development of social cognition and communication. Lawrance Erlbaum, Mahwah Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marshall C, Bly S, Burn-Cottan F (2006) The long term fate of our digital belongings: toward a service model of personal archives. In: Proceedings of IS&T archiving—society for information science and technology, 23–26 May, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mulhem P, Lim JH (2003) Home photo retrieval: time matters. In: International conference on image and video retrieval. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2728. Springer, Berlin, pp 308–317Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nelson K, Fivush R (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: a social cultural development theory. Psychol Rev 111(2):486–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Norman D (1999) The invisible computer. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Petersen MG, Gronbaek K (2004) Domestic hypermedia: mixed media in the home. In: CHI 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 108–109Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petrelli D, Whittaker S, Brockmeier J (2008) Autotopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? In: CHI 2008. ACM Press, New York, pp 53–62Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Petrelli D, van den Hoven E, Whittaker S (2009) making history: intentional capturing of future memories. In: CHI 2009. ACM Press, New York, pp 1723–1732Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Platt JC, Czerwinski M, Field BA (2003) PhotoTOC: automatic clustering for browsing personal photographs. In: Proceedings of the fourth IEEE Pacific rim conference (ICICS-FCM 2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodden K, Wood K (2003) How do people manage their digital photographs?. In: ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (ACM CHI 2003), April 2003. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith MA, Fiore AT (2001) Visualization components for persistent conversations. ACM SIG CHI 2001Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stevens M, Abowd G, Truong K, Vollmer F (2003) Getting into the living memory box: family archives & holistic design. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 7:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taylor A, Harper R, Swan L, Izadi S, Sellen A, Perry M (2007) Homes that make us smart. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11(5):383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tversky B (2004) Narratives of space, time, and life. Mind Lang 19:380–392Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    van den Hoven E (2004) Graspable cues for everyday recollecting. Ph. D. thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    van den Hoven E, Eggen B (2008) Informing augmented memory system design through autobiographical memory theory. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 12(6):433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0177-9 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wagenaar WA (1986) My memory: a study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cogn Psychol 18:225–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Whittaker S, Hirschberg J (2001) The character, value, and management of personal paper archives. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 8:150–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Whittaker S (2005) Supporting collaborative task management in email. Hum Comput Interact 20:49–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Whittaker S, Bergman O, Clough P (2009) Easy on that trigger dad: a study of long term family photo retrieval. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. doi: 10.1007/s00779-009-0218-7
  50. 50.
    Whittaker S, Sidner C (1996) Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In: Proceedings of the CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New york, pp 276–283Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information StudiesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations