Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 363–379 | Cite as

Exploring casual point-and-tilt interactions for mobile geo-blogging

  • Simon Robinson
  • Parisa Eslambolchilar
  • Matt Jones
Original Article

Abstract

People record and share their experiences through text, audio and video. Increasingly they do this blogging from mobile devices. We illustrate a novel, mobile, low interaction cost approach to support the creation of a rich record of journeys made and places encountered: by pointing and tilting a mobile, users indicate their interests in a location. We built three mobile prototypes to explore the approach—the first one combines gestures and visual map feedback; the second provides a simpler visual interface; the third supports eyes-free interaction, allowing the user to simply point-and-tilt, with no visual display required. We describe two field studies undertaken to understand the value of the interaction styles afforded, then continue with a further user study to assess the interaction speed and accuracy between these interaction methods. We present the results of these studies and raise issues relevant to their design and to the wider class of devices and services concerned with mobile spatial information access.

References

  1. 1.
    Bamford W, Coulton P, Edwards R (2007) Space-time travel blogging using a mobile phone. In: ACE ’07: proceedings of the international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beale R (2006) Mobile blogging: experiences of technologically inspired design. In: CHI ’06: CHI ’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 225–230Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Egenhofer M (1999) Spatial information appliances: a next generation of geographic information systems. In: First Brazilian workshop on geoinformaticsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Espinoza F, Persson P, Sandin A, Nystr H (2001) Elenor Cacciatore, and Markus Bylund. GeoNotes: social and navigational aspects of location-based information systems. In: Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2201/2001. Springer, Berlin, pp 2–17Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fröhlich P, Simon R, Baillie L, Anegg H (2006) Comparing conceptual designs for mobile access to geo-spatial information. In: MobileHCI ’06: proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, New York, pp 109–112Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guinard D, Streng S, Gellersen H (2007) Extending mobile devices with spatially arranged gateways to pervasive services. In: International workshop on pervasive mobile interaction devices (PERMID 2007) at the international conference on pervasive computing, PERVASIVE 2007Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hallnäs L, Redström J (2001) Slow technology–designing for reflection. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5(3):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human mental workload, pp 139–183Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones M, Buchanan G, Cheng T-C, Jain P (2006) Changing the pace of search: supporting “background” information seeking. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57(6):838–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nardi BA, Schiano DJ, Gumbrecht M, Swartz L (2004) Why we blog. Commun ACM 47(12):41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pering T, Anokwa Y, Want R (2007) Gesture connect: facilitating tangible interaction with a flick of the wrist. In: TEI ’07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, New York, pp 259–262Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rekimoto J, Miyaki T, Ishizawa T (2007) LifeTag: WiFi-based continuous location logging for life pattern analysis. In: Location- and context-awareness. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4718/2007. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–49Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson S, Eslambolchilar P, Jones M (2008) Point-to-geoblog: gestures and sensors to support user generated content creation. In: MobileHCI ’08: proceedings of the 10th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, New York, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rukzio E, Leichtenstern K, Callaghan V, Holleis P, Schmidt A, Chin J (2006) An experimental comparison of physical mobile interaction techniques: touching, pointing and scanning. In: UbiComp 2006: ubiquitous Computing, vol 4206/2006. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–104Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon R, Fröhlich P (2007) A mobile application framework for the geospatial web. In: WWW ’07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, pp 381–390Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon R, Fröhlich P, Anegg H (2006) Beyond location based—the spatially aware mobile phone. In: Web and wireless geographical information systems, vol 4295/2006. Springer, Berlin, pp 12–21Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon R, Kunczier H, Anegg H (2007) Towards orientation-aware location based mobile services. In: Location based services and telecartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–290Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strachan S, Williamson J, Murray-Smith R (2007) Show me the way to monte carlo: density-based trajectory navigation. In: CHI ’07: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1245–1248Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wasinger R, Stahl C, Krüger A (2003) M3I in a pedestrian navigation & exploration system. In: human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, vol 2795/2003. Springer, Berlin, pp 481–485Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williamson J, Murray-Smith R, Hughes S (2007) Shoogle: excitatory multimodal interaction on mobile devices. In: CHI ’07: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 121–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Robinson
    • 1
  • Parisa Eslambolchilar
    • 1
  • Matt Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Future Interaction Technology Lab, Computer Science DepartmentSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations