Advertisement

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 539–548 | Cite as

Ubiquitous Personal Study: a framework for supporting information access and sharing

  • Hong Chen
  • Qun JinEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The information resources on the Web are diversified, the amount of which is increasing rapidly. Demands for selecting useful information from the Internet, managing personal contents, and sharing contents under control have risen. In this study, we propose the Ubiquitous Personal Study, a framework of personalized virtual study to support accessing, managing, organizing, sharing and recommending information. In this paper, we focus on discussing the framework, and design and implementation issues on how to implement it with Web 2.0 mash-up technology and Open Source Software.

Keywords

Open Source Software Resource Description Framework User Profile Collaborative Filter Ubiquitous Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work has been partly supported by 2007/2008 Waseda University Grants for Special Research Projects No. 2007B-223, No. 2007B-224 and No. 2008B-228, 2007–2009 Waseda University Advanced Research Center for Human Sciences Project (Seeds-Type) “Learning Sciences,” and 2007–2009 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) No. 19200055.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen H, Jin Q (2006) Ubiquitous Personal Study: learning and information access support through cross social network services. In: Proceedings of ICCE2006 MULE workshop, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological theory, vol 1. State University of New York, Stony Brook, pp 201–233Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ankolekar A et al. (2007) The two cultures: mashing up Web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: Proceedings of WWW2007, pp 825–834, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floyd IR, Cameron Jones M, Rathi D, Twidale MB (2007) Web mash-ups and patchwork prototyping: user-driven technological innovation with Web 2.0 and open source software. In: Proceedings of HICSS2007, pp 86–86Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishikawa M, Morita T, Izumi N, Yamaguchi T (2007) Content portal recommendation engine based on access log analysis. In: Proceeding of JSAI2007, Miyazaki, JapanGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kyosuke K, Koichi Y, Hiroshi K, Hiroshi N (2005) A web contents recommendation system based on collaborative filtering by using bloggers’ interests. In: Proceedings of FIT2006, Kitakyusyu, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doi S, Yoshida Y, Higashino S (2004) RUI-filtering: a content-based collaborative filtering algorithm using the access log of related items. In: Proceedings of DEWS2004, Mie, JapanGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bao S et al. (2007) Optimizing web search using social annotations. In: Proceedings of WWW2007, pp 501–510, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singla P, Richardson M (2008) Yes, there is a correlation—from social networks to personal behavior on the Web. In: Proceedings of WWW2008, pp 655–664, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vuorikari R, Manouselis N, Duval E (2008) Metadata for social recommendations: storing, sharing, and reusing evaluations of learning resources. In: Goh D, Foo S (eds) Social information retrival systems: emerging technologies and applications for searching the web effectively, pp 87–107. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li X, Guo L, Zhao YE (2008) Tag-based social interest discovery. In: Proceedings of WWW2008, pp 675–684, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim P, Podlaseck M, Pingali G (2004) Personal chronicling tools for enhancing information archival and collaboration in enterprises. In: Proceedings of 1st ACM workshop on continuous archival and retrieval of personal experience, pp 56–65Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golder S, Huberman BA (2008) The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Available at http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0508/0508082.pdf, accessed 9 May 2008
  14. 14.
    Hildebrandt M, Gutwirth S (eds) (2008) Profiling the European citizen: cross-disciplinary perspectives. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahn J-W et al. (2007) Open user profiles for adaptive news systems: help or harm? In: Proceedings of WWW2007, pp 11–20, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Semeraro G et al. (2007) Discovering user profiles from semantically indexed scientific papers. In: Carbonell JG, Siekmann J (eds) FromWeb to SocialWeb: discovering and deploying user and content profiles. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 4737. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 61–81Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    http://gmpg.org/xfn Accessed 9 May 2008
  19. 19.
    OpenID: http://openid.net/what/. Accessed 9 May 2008
  20. 20.
    Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 7(1):76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Informatics and Cognitive SciencesWaseda UniversitySaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations