Advertisement

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 15–30 | Cite as

Pursuing genius loci: interaction design and natural places

  • Nicola J. BidwellEmail author
  • David Browning
Original Article

Abstract

Human computer interaction (HCI) has little explored everyday life and enriching experiences in rural, wilderness and other predominantly “natural” places despite their socioeconomic importance. Beyond simply addressing the challenge arising from applying an urban perspective to designing technologies for use in natural places, we wish to provoke integration of the natural and computational worlds. To stimulate design that both draws upon and affords such integration, we propose seven themes we have distilled from the literature and supplement these with our own research observations. Bodies Imagine and Remember recognizes the inseparability of meanings and corporeal experience of natural places for design. Indexicality and Habitus refers to the need for design to be sensitive to the processes by which natural features become intelligible in our actions and communication. Values and Story-spaces observes the way representations and infrastructures, infused with particular values, become dominant. Identity and Belonging, suggests the need to reconcile designs with couplings between physical settings, processes of community and personal identity. Rhythm and Dynamism considers links between people’s daily routines, nature’s events and patterns and spatial and social issues pertinent to design and in Revealing and Receding we suggest that design must simultaneously fade into the background and provoke seeing natural places differently. Fragility, Liability and Spirituality refers to technological opportunities to support positive relations within ecosystems and recognizing the limits of technological control.

Keywords

Natural places Wilderness Rural Nature Habitus Spatial practices Dialogic Indexicality Embodiment Feltlife 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to: KM for cowcam reflections; GF for insightful discussions; PD for provocation; BT and GM for practical support; and, Mama, Tata, Sixolile, Bulelwa and, especially, Thulani Sithelo for their nurture in Transkei.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M et al (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford Universtiy PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ames T (2003) Putting fishermen’s knowledge to work: the promise and pitfalls. In: Haggan N, Brignall C, Wood L (eds) Putting Fishers’ knowledge to work: conference proceedings: 27–30 August 2001. FCRR, Vancouver, pp 184–189Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appleton J (1975) The experience of landscape. WileyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashok A, Beck C (2007) Using activity theory to develop a design framework for rural development. In: Proc. CHI ‘07 Extended abstracts. ACM Press, New York, pp 2255–2260Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Axup J, Viller S (2005) Augmenting travel gossip: design for mobile communities. In: Proc. OzCHI, Canberra, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bentrupperbäumer JM, Reser JP (2002) Measuring & monitoring impacts of visitation & use in the wet tropics world heritage area: a site based bioregional perspective. Rainforest Cooperative Research Centre CairnsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bidwell N, Browning D (2006) Making there: methods to uncover egocentric experience in a dialogic of natural places. In: Proc. OZCHI, Sydney, pp 229–236Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bidwell N, Standley PM, George T (2008) The Landscape’s apprentice: lessons for place centred design from grounding documentary. In: Proc. ACM DIS06 (Designing Interactive Systems), Cape Town, South Africa, pp 88–98Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bizzochi J (2007) The aesthetics of the ambient video experience. In: Proc. perthDAC 2007: 7th Digital Arts & Culture Conference, Perth, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blake EH (2002) Extended Abstract a field computer for animal trackers. In: Conf. on human factors in computing systems, pp 532–533Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p 5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bourdieu P (1991) Language and symbolic power. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brewer J, Dourish P (2006) Storied spaces: cultural accounts of technology and environmental knowing. IJHCS Working paperGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Browning D, Bidwell N, Hardy D, Standley P (2008) Rural encounters: cultural translations through video. In: Proc. OZCHI 08, pp 148–155Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burns GL, Howard P (2003) When wildlife tourism goes wrong: a case study of stakeholder and management issues regarding Dingoes on Fraser Island, Australia. Tourism Manag 24(6):699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campari I, Frank A (1995) Cultural differences and cultural aspects in GIS. In: Nyerges T, Mark D, Laurini R, Egenhofer M (eds) Cognitive aspects of human computer interaction for geographic information systems. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 249–266Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Casey ES (2002) Representing place: landscape painting and maps. University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang A, Ishii H (2006) Towards culture centred design. In: Proc. DIS’06 (Designing Interactive Systems) University ParkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chenoweth RE, Gobster PH (1990) The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape. Landsc J 9(1):1–8Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cloke P (1994) (En)culturing political economy: a life in the day of a “rural geographer”. In: Cloak P, Doel M, Matless D, Phillips M, Thrift N (eds) Writing the rural: five cultural geographies. Paul Chapman, London, pp 149–190Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cosgrove D (1978) Place, landscape, and the dialectics of cultural geography. Can Geographer 22(1):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crabtree A, Rodden T (2004) Domestic routines and design for the home. Comput Support Cooperative Work (CSCW) 13(2):191–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey Bass Pubs, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Certeau M (1988) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dourish P (2006) Re-spaceing place: “Place” and “Space” ten years on. In: Proc. 20th CSCW, pp 299–308Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dourish P (2007) Seeing like an interface. In: Proc. OzCHI 2007, Adelaide, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dreyfus HL (1991) Being in the world: a commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ehrke BR, Bidwell NJ (2008) Demonstrating a MR game used to explore locations in tropical North Queensland. In: Proc. interactive entertainment, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Facer K, Joiner R, Stanton D, Reid J, Hull R, Kirk D (2004) Savannah: mobile gaming and learning? J Comput Assist Learn 20(6):399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fairweather JR, Swaffield SR (2003) Tourist experiences of landscape in New Zealand: themes from three case studies. Tourism Cult Commun 4(2):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flynn B (2005) Imaging gameplaythe design and construction of spatial worlds. In: Proc. Imaginary Worlds Symp., UTS, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gard MS, Bucolo MS, Wyeld MT (2006) Capturing Australian indigenous perceptions of landscape using a virtual environment. In: Proc. virtual systems and multimedia, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Garfinkel H (1987) Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gaver WW (2006) The video window: my life with a ludic system. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gaver WW, Bowers J, Boucher A, Gellerson H, Pennington S, Schmidt A et al (2004) The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In: Proc. conf. human factors in computing systems: CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 885–900Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gilbert E, Karahalios K, Sandvig C (2008) The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life In: Proc. CHI’08, pp 1603–1612Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gowans G, Campbell J, Norman A, Dye R, Astell A, Ellis M (2004) Designing a multimedia conversation aid for reminiscence therapy in dementia care environments. In: Proc CHI'04, pp 825–836Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Halfacree KH (1994) The importance of” the rural” in the constitution of counter urbanization: evidence from England in the 1980s. Social Ruralis 34(23):164–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Halloran J, Hornecker E, Fitzpatrick G, Weal M, Millard D, Michaelides D et al (2006) Unfolding understandings: codesigning ubicomp in situ, over time. In: 6th DIS, pp 109–118Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hargreaves D (2008) Low-cost; low-bandwidth online meetings between scientists and farmers. In: Proc. OZCHI'08. Cairns, pp 271–274Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harper R, Randall D, Smyth N, Evans C, Heledd L, Moore R (2008) The past is a different place: they do things differently there. In: Proc. DIS (Designing Interactive Systems) 08, Cape Town, pp 271–280Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harter T, Vroegindeweij S, Geelhoed E, Manahan M, Ranganathan P (2004) Energy-aware user interfaces: an evaluation of user acceptance. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human factors in computing systems, pp 199–206Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hauge AL (2007) Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architect Sci Rev 50(1):44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hovardas T, Stamou GP (2006) Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of ‘nature’,’wildlife’, and ‘landscape’. Biodivers Conserv 15(5):1745–1770Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ittelson WH, Franck KA, O’Hanlon TJ (1976) The nature of environmental experience. In: Wapner S, Cohen SB, Kaplan B (eds) Experiencing the environment. Plenum Press, New York, pp 187–206Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jeremijenko N “OneTree.” http://www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/onetrees/. Accessed 30 Dec 2008
  47. 47.
    Kaplan R, Ryan RL, Kaplan S (1998) With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Island PressGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kethers S, Hargreaves D, Wilkinson R (2004) Remote meetings between farmers and researchers: a case study on asymmetry. In: Proc. ACM CSCW, pp 624–627Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Klemmer SR, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In: Proc. 6th ACM DIS06 (Designing Interactive Systems), pp 140–149Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krug K, Mountain D, Phan D (2003) Location based services for mobile users in protected areas. Geoinformatics 6:26–29Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kurokawa T (2006) Japanese landscape and my environmental design. In: Proc. Asia Pacific symp. on information visualisation, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lee SP, Cheok AD, James TKS, Debra GPL, Jie CW, Chuang W et al (2006) A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for humanpoultry interaction through the internet. Pers Ubiquit Comp 10(5):301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Loibl W, Orthofer R (2002) Spatial risk modeling for water shortage and nitrate pollution in the lower Jordan Valley. ARCóS0162Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Maunder A, Marsden G, Tucker WD (2006) Evaluating the relevance of the ‘real access’ criteria as a framework for rural HCI research. In: Proc. CHISA, pp 57–79Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mausner C (1996) A kaleidoscope model: defining natural environments. J Env Psychol 16(4):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mausner C (2006) Capturing the hike experience on video: a new methodology for studying human transactions with nature. In: Proc. Northeastern Recreation Research Symp, Bolton Landing, NY, pp 168–176Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    McCarthy J, Wright P (2005) Putting ‘feltlife’ at the centre of humancomputer interaction (HCI). Cogn Technol Work 7(4):262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McCarthy J, Wright P (2005) Technology in place: dialogics of technology, place and self. In: Proc. INTERACT, Rome, pp 914–926Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    McCarthy J, Wright P (2006) Dialogical approach to experience: uncovering critical potential. In: Proc. the virtual conference M3: man medium machine research platform, pp 621–638Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    McCarthy J, Wright P, Wallace J, Dearden A (2006) The experience of enchantment in humancomputer interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comp 10(6):369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McCaw C (2007) Art and (second) life: over the hills and far away?. In: Proc. perthDAC 2007: 7th Digital Arts & Culture Conference, Perth, pp 241–254Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Murphy P (2002) Sea change: reinventing rural and regional Australia. Transform J 3:1–12Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    O’Brien S, Mueller FF (2007) Jogging the distance. In: Proc. CHI ‘07, San Jose, pp 523–526Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Omodei MM, McLennan J, Whitford P (1998) Using a headmounted video camera and two stage replay to enhance orienteering performance. Int J Sport Psychol 29:115–131Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Parikh TS, Lazowska ED (2006) Designing an architecture for delivering mobile information services to the rural developing world. In: Proceedings of the 15th international Conf. on World Wide Web, pp 791–800Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Parsons R, Hartig T (2000) Environmental psychophysiology. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pascoe J, Ryan N, Morse D (2000) Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. In: Proc. ACM TOCHI, pp 417–437Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Paulos E, Jenkins T (2005) Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres. In: Proc. ACM human factors in computing systems, pp 341–350Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Peltzer K (2002) Personality and person perception in Africa. Social Behav Pers 20:83–94Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Porteous D (2007) Just how transformational is mbanking? Paper commissioned by FinMark Trust.[http://www.finmarktrust.org.za/accessfrontier/accessfrontier. html]
  71. 71.
    Reddy M, Dourish P (2002) A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. New Orleans, pp 344–353Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rose DB (1996) Nourishing terrains: Australian aboriginal views of landscape & wilderness. AHCGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rouncefield M et al (2002) Workshop position paper: understanding space, place and ‘community’ in HCI. http://www.infosci.cornell.edu/place/. Accessed Sept 2005
  74. 74.
    Rouncefield M, Saslis, Laougdakis G, Chevrst K, Dix A, Fitton D, Kray C et al. (2005). Probing designs: designing probes appropriate methods for design. In: Proc. OZCHI design in complex & sensitive settings workshop. http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/c.kray/pub/CheverstEtAl05_ProbingDesign.pdf. Accessed May 2008
  75. 75.
    Ryan C, Hughes K, Chirgwin S (2000) The gaze, spectacle and ecotourism. Ann Tour Res 27(1):148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sell JL, Taylor JG, Zube EH (1984) Toward a theoretical framework for landscape perception. In: Saafinen TF, Seamon D, Sell JL (eds) Env. Percept. & Behav: An Inventory & Prospect, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 61–83Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sengers P, McCarthy J, Dourish P (2006) Reflective HCI: arcitulating an agenda for critical practice. In: Proc CHI 06. ACM Press, New York, pp 1683–1686Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shafer CS, Inglis GJ (2000) Influence of social, biophysical, and managerial conditions on tourism experiences within the GBRWHA. Env Manag 26(1):73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Short J (1991) Imagined country. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sinanan J (2008) Social tools and social capital: reading mobile phone usage in rural indigenous communities. In: Proc. OZCHI, Cairns, pp 267–270Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Smith BK, Reiser BJ (1998) National geographic unplugged: classroomcentered design of interactive nature films. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys., New York, pp 424–431Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Suchman L (2000) Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind Culture Activity 7(1&2):4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Taylor N, Cheverst K, Fitton D, Race NJP, Rouncefield M, Graham C (2007) Probing communities: study of a village photo display. In: Proc. OZCHI'07, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Thwaites K (2001) Experiential landscape place: an exploration of space & experience in neighbourhood landscape architecture. Landsc Res 26(3):245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Throop CJ, Murphy KM (2002) Bourdieu and phenomenology: a critical assessment. Anthropol Theory 2(2):185–207Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    truna aka Turner J, Browning D, Bidwell N (2007) Wanderer beyond game worlds. In: Proc. DAC ‘07, Perth, pp 364–374Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tuan YF (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Twigger Ross C, Bonaiuto M, BreakwellL G (2003) 7 Identity theories and environmental psychology. In: Psychological theories for environmental issuesGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Ulrich RS (1984) Benefits of nature: view from a hospital bed. Science 224:420–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    van Koppen CSA (2000) Resource, Arcadia, lifeworld. nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociologia Ruralis 40(3):300–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Verran H, Christie M (2007) Using/designing digital technologies of representation in aboriginal Australian knowledge practices. Human Technol Interdiscip J Humans ICT Environ 3(2):214–227Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Walker K, Underwood, Johann, MWaema, Thulani, Dunckley L et al (2008) A resource kit for participatory sociotechnical design in rural Kenya. In: Proc. CHI, ACM Press, pp 2709–2714Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Webb D (2002) Investigating the structure of visitor experiences in the Little Sandy Desert, Western Australia. J Ecotourism 1(2):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Webb J, Schirato T, Danaher G (2002) Understanding Bourdieu. SageGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wilde D, Harris E, Rogers Y, Randell C (2003) The periscope: supporting a computer enhanced field trip for children. Pers Ubiquit Comp 7(3):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Williams K, Harvey D (2001) Transcendent experience in forest environments. J Env Psychol 21(3):249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Winschiers-Theophilus H, Fendler J, Stanley C, Joubert D, Zimmermann I, Mukumbira S (2008) A bush encroachment decision support system’s metamorphosis. In: Proc. OZCHI'08 Cairns, pp 287–290Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Yarwood R (2006) Beyond the Rural Idyll. Geography 90(1):19–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations