Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 365–378 | Cite as

Experiencing the Affective Diary

  • Anna Ståhl
  • Kristina Höök
  • Martin Svensson
  • Alex S. Taylor
  • Marco Combetto
Original Article

Abstract

A diary is generally considered to be a book in which one keeps a regular record of events and experiences that have some personal significance. As such, it provides a useful means to privately express inner thoughts or to reflect on daily experiences, helping in either case to put them in perspective. Taking conventional diary keeping as our starting point, we have designed and built a digital diary, named Affective Diary, with which users can scribble their notes, but that also allows for bodily memorabilia to be recorded from body sensors and mobile media to be collected from users’ mobile phones. A premise that underlies the presented work is one that views our bodily experiences as integral to how we come to interpret and thus make sense of the world. We present our investigations into this design space in three related lines of inquiry: (1) a theoretical grounding for affect and bodily experiences; (2) a user-centred design process, arriving at the Affective Diary system; and (3) an exploratory end-user study of the Affective Diary with 4 users during several weeks of use. Through these three inquiries, our overall aim has been to explore the potential of a system that interleaves the physical and cultural features of our embodied experiences and to further examine what media-specific qualities such a design might incorporate. Concerning the media-specific qualities, the key appears to be to find a suitable balance where a system does not dictate what should be interpreted and, at the same time, lends itself to enabling the user to participate in the interpretive act. In the exploratory end-user study users, for the most part, were able to identify with the body memorabilia and together with the mobile data, it enabled them to remember and reflect on their past. Two of our subjects went even further and found patterns in their own bodily reactions that caused them to learn something about themselves and even attempt to alter their own behaviours.

Keywords

Affective interaction Emotional computing Social factors Interaction design Contextual information 

References

  1. 1.
    Boehner K, DePaula R, Dourish P, Sengers P (2005) Affect: from information to interaction. Critical computing conference 2005. Århus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason and the human brain. Grosset/Putnam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson RJ, Pizzagalli D, Nitschke JB, Kalin NH (2003) Parsing the subcomponents of emotion and disorders of emotion: perspectives from affective neuroscience. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH (eds) Handbook of Affective SciencesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fallman D (2003) In romance with the materials of mobile interaction: a phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology. Doctoral Thesis, ISSN 1401–4572, RR.03-04, ISBN 91-7305-578-6, Umeå University, Sweden: Larsson & Co:s TryckeriGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaver B, Dunne T, Pacenti E (1999) Design: cultural probes, interactions, vol 6(1). ACM Press, pp 21–29Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaver B, William W, Boucher, Andrew, Pennington, Sarah, Walker, Brendan (2004) Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty, Interactions, vol 11, Issue 5, ACM Press, pp 53–56Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goethe JV (1976) Goethes färglära, Kosmos förlag, Stockholm, Sweden (translated by Pehr Sällström from Zur Fahrbenlehre, 1810)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harper R, Randall D, Smyth N, Evans C, Heledd L, Moore R (2008) The past is a different place: they do things differently there. In: Proceedings of symposium on designing interactive systems, DIS ‘08, ACM Press, pp 271–280Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Höök K (2006) Designing familiar open surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 4th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: changing roles, Oslo, Norway, pp 242–251Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iacucci G, Iacucci C, Kuutti K (2002) Imagining and experiencing in design, the role of performances. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 167–176Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz J (1999) How emotions work. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lindström M, Ståhl A, Höök K, Sundström P, Laaksolahti J, Combetto M, Taylor A, Bresin R (2006) Affective Diary - Designing for Bodily Expressiveness and Self-Reflection, In proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI conference Computer-Human Interaction (CHI2006), Work in Progress paper, ACM Press, 2006. (Extended abstract)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mandryk RL, Atkins MS (2007) A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65:329–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parkinson B, Fischer A, Manstead ASR (2005) Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press/CSLI Publications, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rudström Å, Höök K, Svensson M (2005). Social positioning: designing the seams between social, physical and digital space. In: 1st international conference on online communities and social computing, at HCII 2005, 24–27 July 2005, Las Vegas, USA., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Russell JA (1980) Circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(6):1161–1178Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryberg K (1991) Levande färger, ICA Bokförlag, Västerås, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scheirer J, Fernandez R, Klein J, Picard R (2002) Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer. Interact Comput 14(2):93–118Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sivik L (1997) Color categories in thought and language, color systems for cognitive research. In: Hardin CL, Maffi L (eds), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 163–193Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ståhl A (2006) Designing for emotional expressivity. Unpublished Licenciate Thesis, Institute of Design, Umeå University, Umeå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sundström P, Ståhl A, Höök K (2007) In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice. Int J Hum Comput Stud 65(4):388–403Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tangney JP, Fischer KW (1995) Self-conscious emotions: the psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. Guilford, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Ståhl
    • 1
  • Kristina Höök
    • 1
  • Martin Svensson
    • 1
  • Alex S. Taylor
    • 2
  • Marco Combetto
    • 2
  1. 1.SICS (Swedish Institute of Computer Science)KistaSweden
  2. 2.Microsoft ResearchCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations