Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 299–312 | Cite as

Connecting the family with awareness systems

  • Natalia Romero
  • Panos Markopoulos
  • Joy van Baren
  • Boris de Ruyter
  • Wijnand IJsselsteijn
  • Babak Farshchian
Original Article

Abstract

Awareness systems have attracted significant research interest for their potential to support interpersonal relationships. Investigations of awareness systems for the domestic environment have suggested that such systems can help individuals stay in touch with dear friends or family and provide affective benefits to their users. Our research provides empirical evidence to refine and substantiate such suggestions. We report our experience with designing and evaluating the ASTRA awareness system, for connecting households and mobile family members. We introduce the concept of connectedness and its measurement through the Affective Benefits and Costs of communication questionnaire (ABC-Q). We inform results that testify the benefits of sharing experiences at the moment they happen without interrupting potential receivers. Finally, we document the role that lightweight, picture-based communication can play in the range of communication media available.

References

  1. 1.
    Bly SA, Harrison SR, Irwin S (1993) Media spaces bringing people together in a video. Audio Comput Environ Commun ACM 36(1):28–47Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dourish P, Bly S (1992) Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Proceedings CHI. ACM Press, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mynatt ED, Rowan J, Jacobs A, Craighill S (2001) Digital family portraits supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In: Proceedings CHI. ACM Press, pp 333–340Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hindus D, Mainwaring SD, Leduc N, Hagström AE, Bayley O (2001) Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. In: Proceedings CHI, pp 325–332Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hutchinson H, Mackay W, Westerlund B, Bederson BB, Druin A, Plaisant C, Beaudoin-Lafon M, Conversy S, Evans H, Hansen H, Roussel N, Eiderbäck B, Lindquist S, Sundblad Y (2003) Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In: Proceedings CHI, ACM Press, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Consolvo S, Roessler P, Shelton BE (2004) The CareNet display: lessons learned from an in home evaluation of an ambient display. In: Proceedings UbicompGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowan J, Mynatt ED (2005) Digital family portrait field trial: support for aging in place. In: Proceedings CHI, ACM Press, pp 521–530Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ronby Pedersen E, Sokoler T (1997) AROMA: abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness. In: Proceedings CHI, ACM Press, pp 51–57Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiser M, Brown J (1996) Designing calm technology. Powergrid J 1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liechti O, Ichikawa T (2000) A digital photography framework supporting social interaction and affective awareness. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 4(1)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Greef P, IJsselsteijn W (2001) Social presence in a home tele-application. Cyberpsychol and Behav 4:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huijnen CAGJ, IJsselsteijn WA, Markopoulos P, de Ruyter B (2004) Enhancing social presence by connecting consumer devices. Cognit Technol Work 6(1):41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markopoulos P, IJsselsteijn W, Huijnen C, Romijn O, Philopoulos A (2001) Supporting social presence through asynchronous awareness systems. In: Riva G, Davide F, IJsselsteijn WA (eds) Being there: concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 261–278Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design. Morgan Kaufmann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IJsselsteijn WA, van Baren J, van Lanen F (2003) Staying in touch: social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchronoys communication media. In: Stephanidis C, Jacko J (eds) Human–computer interaction: theory and practice (Part III). Proceesings of HCI international, vol 2, pp 924–928Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Baren J, IJsselsteijn WA, Markopoulos P, Romero N, de Ruyter B (2004) Measuring affective benefits and costs of awareness systems supporting intimate social networks. In: Nijholt A, Nishida T (eds) Proceedings of 3rd workshop on social intelligence design. CTIT workshop proceedings series WP04–02, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evans NJ, Jarvis PA (1986) The group attitude scale. Small Group Behav 17(2):203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dragicevic P, Huot S (2002) SpiraClock: a continuous and non-intrusive display for upcoming events. In: Proceedings of CHI, ACM Press, pp 604–605Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hourcade JP, Bederson BB, Druin A, Rose A, Farber A, Takayama Y (2003) The International Children’s Digital Library: viewing digital books online. Interact Comput 15(2):151–167Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Höysniemi J, Hämäläinen P, Turkki L (2003) Using peer tutoring in evaluating the usability of a physically interactive computer game with children. Interact Comput 15(2):203–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Romero
    • 1
  • Panos Markopoulos
    • 1
  • Joy van Baren
    • 2
  • Boris de Ruyter
    • 3
  • Wijnand IJsselsteijn
    • 1
  • Babak Farshchian
    • 4
  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ElsevierAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.TelenorTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations