Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 319–323 | Cite as

Social functions of location in mobile telephony

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Location appears to be one of the most important aspects of context in mobile communication. It is a complex piece of information involving several levels of detail. Location intertwines with other relevant aspects of context: the parties’ present activity, relative time and identities. The analysis of mobile conversations provides insights into the functions of “location” for mobile users. Most mobile calls involve a sequence in which location is reported. Location is made relevant by the parties’ activities. Location telling takes place in five different activity contexts during mobile calls. Location may be an index of interactional availability, a precursor for mutual activity, part of an ongoing activity, or it may bear emergent relevance for the activity or be presented as a social fact. Typically, joint activities make relevant spatio-temporal location such as distance in minutes from the meeting point via the vehicle used. For users, location does not appear to be relevant in purely geographical terms.

Keywords

Location awareness Location-aware computing Context awareness Context-aware computing Conversation analysis Mobile conversations 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Ilpo Koskinen, Esko Kurvinen, Ditte Laursen, Kalle Toiskallio and Alexandra Weilenmann for their helpful suggestions and comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Beadle HWP, Harper B, Maguire GQ Jr, Judge J (1997) Location aware mobile computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE/IEE International Conference on Telecommunications, (ICTi97), Melbourne, April 1997, pp 1319–1314Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beigl M (2002) Special issue on location modeling in ubiquitous computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 6:311–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Satyanarayanan M (2001) Pervasive computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Communications 2001, August 10–17Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ling R (2001) Guest editorial: mobile communication and the reformulation of the social order. Pers Ubiquit Comput 5:83–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ling R, Haddon L (2001) Mobile telephony, mobility and the coordination of everyday life. http://www.telenor.no/fou/program/nomadiske/articles/rich/(2001)Mobile.pdf (26.5.04)
  6. 6.
    BarkhuusL (2003) Context information in mobile telephony. In Proceedings of Mobile HCI 2003, Udine, Italy, ACM Press, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenberg S (2001) Context as a dynamic construct. Human Comput Interact16(2–4):257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8:19–30. DOI 10.1007/s00779–003–0253–8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barkhuus L, Dey AK (2003) Location-based services for mobile telephony: a study of users’ privacy concerns INTERACT 2003. In: 9th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, to appear. September 1–5, 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaasinen E (2003) User needs for location-aware mobile services. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7:70–79. DOI 10.1007/s00779–002–0214–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    JordanT, Raubel M, Gartrell B, Egenhofer M (1998) An affordance-based model of place in GIS. In: Spatial Data Handling 98. Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 1998, pp 98–110Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laurier E (2001) Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls. Environ Plan D Soc Space19:485–504. DOI 10.1068/d228tGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weilenmann A (2003) ‘I can’t talk now, I’m in a fitting room’. Availability and location in mobile phone conversations. In: Laurier E (ed) Special issue on technology and mobility. J Environ Plan A 35(9):1589–1605Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkinson J M , Heritage J (eds) (1984) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    HutchbyI, Wooffitt R (1998) Conversation analysis. principles, practices & applications. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arminen I, Leinonen M (2006) Mobile phone call openings—tailoring answers to personalized summons. Discourse Stud 8:2Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schegloff EA (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Stud 9:111–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schegloff EA (2002) Reflections on research on telephone conversation: issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import and consequences. In: Luke KK, Pavlidou TS (eds) Telephone calls: unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. John Benjamins, Amsterdam pp 249–282Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schegloff EA (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociol Inq 50:104–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social PsychologyUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations