Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 402–415 | Cite as

Little brother: could and should wearable computing technologies be applied to reducing older people’s fear of crime?

  • Mark A. Blythe
  • Peter C. Wright
  • Andrew F. Monk
Original Article

Abstract

This paper considers whether emerging wearable computing technologies could and should be applied to reducing older people’s fear of crime. The paper begins by exploring the sociological and criminological literature, which debates why older people are most likely to fear crime, even though they are least likely to be victims. It goes on to report findings from ethnographic studies of key care and social service professionals in an English city. This field work reflects the ways in which assistive technologies for older people can function as signs of vulnerability, and also reports the uses of relatively simple information and communication technologies in providing critical backup and reassurance for elderly users. The fear of crime is then considered as an information problem centring on three questions: what’s going on, what can I do about it and can I get help? Possible applications of emerging wearable surveillance technologies are then explored through a design concept called the Cambadge. This is a wearable, wireless webcam for older people to broadcast video and audio data to police or community Web sites. This concept is situated with reference to a company developing a similar technology and to related fields. It is argued that the design problems of such surveillance technology are inherently political. The case is made with reference to the history and philosophy of surveillance and the massive demographic shifts of the ageing population. It is argued that utopian visions of the uses of such technology under-theorise power and accountability. The paper concludes that technological innovations will not adequately address older people’s fear of crime without accompanying social and cultural change.

Keywords

Fear of crime Older people Wearable computing Personal ubiquitous computing Webcams Internet communities Surveillance technology Privacy Social dependability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Dependability Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration (DIRC) funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

References

  1. 1.
    Age Concern (2002) Concerned about ageing? The needs of older people: key issues and evidence. Age Concern, London, available at http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/ageconcern/media/Concernedaboutageing0202.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Help The Aged (2002) Older people and fear of crime. Help The Aged, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brogden M, Nijhar P (2000) Crime, abuse and the elderly. Willan, Devon, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Help The Aged (2002) Tackling older people’s fear of crime. Help The Aged, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leveson N (1995) Safeware: system safety and computers. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Home accident surveillance system (HASS) (2001) Working for a safer world. In: 23rd annual report of the home and leisure accident surveillance system: 1999 data. HMSO, Department of Trade and Industry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen L (1994) Old age: cultural and critical perspectives. Anthropology 23:137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shukor S (2003) Mobiles are a new primary school must. The Sunday Times, 10 August 2003, available at http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8903-772549,00.html
  9. 9.
    Koskela H (2003) “Cam Era”—the contemporary urban Panopticon. Surveill Soc 1:292–313Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burns RJ, Henson HK Social effects of the Badge Camera, available at http://www.outlander.com/badgecamera/social_effects.htm
  11. 11.
    Brin D (1998) The transparent society: will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Hagan A (2003) Watching me watching them watching you. Lond Rev Books 25(19)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brotherton J (2003) Preserving, sharing, and learning from personal experiences and skills. Presentation to York HCI group, HCI group seminars, summer term, 5th August 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mann S, Nolan J, Wellman B (2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveill Soc 1(3):331–355Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyon D (2001) Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life. Open University Press, Buckingham, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shakespeare W (1602) Troillus and Cressida. Act 2. Scene 3. Line 3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foucault M (1991) Introduction. In: Rabinow P (ed) The Foucault reader. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    United Nations (1999) Population ageing 1999. United Nations publication, (ST/ESA/SER.A/179), sales no. E.99.XIII.11, available at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/aging99/ta99.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Blythe
    • 1
  • Peter C. Wright
    • 1
  • Andrew F. Monk
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkEngland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of YorkEngland

Personalised recommendations