Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 19–30 | Cite as

What we talk about when we talk about context

  • Paul DourishEmail author
Original Article


The emergence of ubiquitous computing as a new design paradigm poses significant challenges for human-computer interaction (HCI) and interaction design. Traditionally, HCI has taken place within a constrained and well-understood domain of experience—single users sitting at desks and interacting with conventionally-designed computers employing screens, keyboards and mice for interaction. New opportunities have engendered considerable interest in “context-aware computing”—computational systems that can sense and respond to aspects of the settings in which they are used. However, considerable confusion surrounds the notion of “context”—what it means, what it includes and what role it plays in interactive systems. This paper suggests that the representational stance implied by conventional interpretations of “context” misinterprets the role of context in everyday human activity, and proposes an alternative model that suggests different directions for design.


Context-aware computing Ethnomethodology 



The ideas expressed here have benefited from discussions with many people, including Gregory Abowd, Saul Greenberg, Tom Moran, David Redmiles, Tom Rodden, Dave Snowdon, Dag Svanaes and Jack Whalen. I am also grateful to participants at the FX PAL Workshop on Mobile Services and the HCI Consortium on Pervasive Computing, both held in 2001, for their contributions. This work has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation through awards 0133749, 0205724, and 0326105.


  1. Abowd G, Mynatt E and Rodden T (2002) The human experience. IEEE Perv Comput Jan-Mar:48–57Google Scholar
  2. Ark W, Selker T (1999) A look at human interaction with pervasive computers. IBM Sys J 38(4):504–507Google Scholar
  3. Bowker G, Star L (1999) Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Brave S, Dahley D (1997) inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97), Atlanta, GA, 22–27 March 1997Google Scholar
  5. Brumitt B, Meyers B, Krumm J, Kern A and Shafer S (2000) EasyLiving: technologies for intelligent environments. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing (HUC’00), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheverst K, Davis N, Mitchell K, Friday A and Efstreatiou C (2000) Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some Issues and experiences. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI’00), The Hague, The Netherlands, 1–6 April 2000Google Scholar
  7. Dashofy E, van der Hoek A and Taylor R (2001) A highly-extensible, XML-based architecture description language. In: Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2001), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 28–31 August 2001Google Scholar
  8. Dey A, Abowd G and Salber D (2001) A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum-Comp Interact 16(2–4):97–166Google Scholar
  9. Dourish P (1995) Accounting for system behaviour: representation, reflection and resourceful action. In: Proceedings of the Third Decennial Conference on Computers in Context (CIC’95), Aarhus, Denmark, 14–18 August 1995Google Scholar
  10. Dourish P (1998) Using metalevel techniques for flexibility in CSCW toolkits. ACM Trans Comp-Hum Interact 5(2):109–155Google Scholar
  11. Dourish P (2001) Where the action Is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Dourish P, Button G (1998) On technomethodology: foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Hum-Comp Interact 13(4):395–432Google Scholar
  13. Dourish P, Lamping J and Rodden T (1999) Building bridges: customisation and mutual intelligibility in shared category management. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’99), Phoenix, AZ, 14–17 November 1999Google Scholar
  14. Dourish P, Edwards K, LaMarca A, Lamping J, Petersen K, Salisbury M, Terry D and Thornton J (2000) Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties. ACM Trans Info Sys 18(2):140–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dourish P, Redmiles D (2002) An approach to usable security based on event monitoring and visualization. In: Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop 2002, Virginia Beach, VA, 23–26 September 2002Google Scholar
  16. Fischer C (1992) America calling: a social history of the telephone to 1940. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman E, Gelernter D (1996) Lifestreams: a storage model for personal data. SIGMOD Rec 25(1):80–86Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Garfinkel H, Lynch M and Livingston E (1981) The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Phil Soc Sci 11:131–158Google Scholar
  20. Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchins EL, Hollan JD and Norman DA (1986) Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Norman & Draper (eds) User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits, and atoms. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97), Atlanta, GA, 22–27 March 1997Google Scholar
  23. Lamming M, Flynn M (1994) Forget-me-not: intimate computing in support of human memory. In: Proceedings of FRIEND21 ‘94, the International Symposium on Next Generation Human Interface, Magufo Jagoen, Japan, 2–4 February 1994 Google Scholar
  24. Ling R, Yttri B (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: Katz and Aakhus (eds) Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private space, public performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Luff P, Hindmarsh J and Heath C (eds) (2000) Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Mackay W (1990) Patterns of sharing customizable software. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’90), Los Angeles, CA, 7–10 October 1990Google Scholar
  27. MacLean A, Carter K, Moran T and Lövstrand L (1990) User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’90), Seattle, WA, 1–5 April 1990Google Scholar
  28. Mark G (2002) Conventions and commitments in distributed groups. Comp Supp Coop Work 11(3–4):349–387Google Scholar
  29. Marshall C, Shipman F (1993) Searching for the missing link: discovering implicit structure in spatial hypertext. In: Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext ‘93 Conference, Seattle, WA, 14–18 November 1993Google Scholar
  30. Minneman S, Harrison S, Janssen B, Kurtenbach G, Moran T, Smith I and van Melle W (1995) A confederation of tools for capturing and accessing collaborative activity. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia ‘95 San Francisco, CA, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Mørch A, Mehandjiev N (2000) Tailoring as collaboration: the mediating role of multiple representations and application units. Comp Supp Coop Work 9(1):75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodden T, Cheverst K, Davies K and Dix A (1998) Exploiting context in HCI design for mobile systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Glasgow, Scotland, 21–23 May 1998Google Scholar
  33. Plowman L, Rogers Y and Ramage M (1995) What are workplace studies for? In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’95), Stockholm, Sweden, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan N, Pascoe J and Morse D (1997) Enhanced reality fieldwork: the context-aware archeological assistant. In: Gaffney, Leusen and Exxon (eds) Computer applications in archeology, British Archaelogical Reports, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Sacks H (1984) On doing ‘being ordinary’. In: Atkinson and Heritage (eds) Structures of social action, Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Schilit B, Adams N and Want R (1994) Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz, CA, IEEE Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Schilit B, Theimer M (1994) Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Netwk 8(5):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Sproull L, Kiesler S (1991) Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Strong R, Gaver W (1996) Scent and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Boston, MA, 16–20 November 1996Google Scholar
  41. Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Sudnow D (1972) Temporal parameters of interpersonal observation. In: Sudnow D (ed) Studies in social interaction, Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Tolmie P, Pycock J, Diggins T, MacLean A and Karsenty A (2002) Unremarkable computing. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002), Minneapolis, MN, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265(3):94–104Google Scholar
  45. Weiser M (1993) Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Comm ACM 36(7):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information and Computer ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations