Journal of Orthopaedic Science

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 969–976 | Cite as

Leg length discrepancy and lower limb alignment after total hip arthroplasty in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients

  • Hiroshi Fujimaki
  • Yutaka Inaba
  • Naomi Kobayashi
  • Taro Tezuka
  • Yasuhide Hirata
  • Tomoyuki Saito
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. However, no reports have described the influence of lower limb alignment on LLD after THA. In the present study, we firstly investigated the change in lower limb alignment after THA. Secondly, we determined the influence of lower limb alignment on LLD after THA. Thirdly, we evaluated the influence of LLD in the entire lower leg on the clinical outcomes after THA.

Methods

We followed up with 54 unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients 1 year after THA. For the radiological assessment of LLD and lower limb alignment, we obtained anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis and both lower legs in entirety in a standing position before and 1 year after THA. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) were also obtained to assess the clinical outcome.

Resuts

The alignment of the affected leg, which was more valgus than the unaffected leg before THA, tended toward varus after THA, and the discrepancy between the lower limb alignments on both sides decreased. However, the alignment discrepancies that remained after THA influenced the LLD measured on the radiograph of the entire lower leg, and this LLD influenced the clinical outcome as measured by the HHS and the WOMAC score.

Conclusions

LLD in the entire lower leg should be corrected for a better clinical outcome after THA.

References

  1. 1.
    Hofmann AA, Skrzynski MC. Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits! Orthopedics. 2000;23:943–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maloney WJ, Keeney JA. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:108–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smyth EH. Windswept deformity. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1980;62:166–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weidow J, Mars I, Kärrholm J. Medial and lateral osteoarthritis of the knee is related to variations of hip and pelvic anatomy. Osteoarthritis cartilage. 2005;13:471–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kandemir U, Yazici M, Alpaslan AM, Surat A. Morphology of the knee in adult patients with neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84:2249–57.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T. Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee. 2002;9:275–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takahashi T, Yamanaka N, Komatsu M, Ogawa Y, Yoshida S, Yamamoto H. A new computer-assisted method for measuring the tibio-femoral angle in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis cartilage. 2004;12:256–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iseki Y, Takahashi T, Takeda H, Tsuboi I, Imai H, Mashima N, Watanabe S, Yamamoto H. Defining the load bearing axis of the lower extremity obtained from anterior-posterior digital radiographs of the whole limb in stance. Osteoarthritis cartilage. 2009;17:586–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrews M, Noyes FR, Hewett TE, Andriacchi TP. Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:289–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Umeda N, Miki H, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Progression of osteoarthritis of the knee after unilateral total hip arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:149–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1969;51:737–55.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ware JE Jr. Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woolson ST, Harris WH. A method of intraoperative limb length measurement in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;194:207–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williamson JA, Reckling FW. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;134:135–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ariumi A, Sato T, Kobayashi K, Koga Y, Omori G, Minato I, Endo N. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment in the weight-bearing standing position in healthy elderly subjects. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:64–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harvey WF, Yang M, Cooke TD, Segal NA, Lane N, Lewis CE, Felson DT. Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:287–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lang JE, Scott RD, Lonner JH, Bono JV, Hunter DJ, Li L. Magnitude of limb lengthening after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:341–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87:155–7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Austin MS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:88–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clark CR, Huddleston HD, Schoch EP 3rd, Thomas BJ. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:38–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS. Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41:1261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bryant D, Havey TC, Roberts R, Guyatt G. How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006;88:41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park MS, Kim SJ, Chung CY, Choi IH, Lee SH, Lee KM. Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2010;92:1732–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Fujimaki
    • 1
  • Yutaka Inaba
    • 1
  • Naomi Kobayashi
    • 1
  • Taro Tezuka
    • 1
  • Yasuhide Hirata
    • 1
  • Tomoyuki Saito
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryYokohama City UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations