Journal of Orthopaedic Science

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 994–1004 | Cite as

The fate and role of bone graft-derived cells after autologous tendon and bone transplantation into the bone tunnel

  • Hiroto Komiyama
  • Yuji Arai
  • Yoshihiko Kajikawa
  • Atsuhiko Yoshida
  • Toru Morihara
  • Ryu Terauchi
  • Yoshikazu Kida
  • Hiroyoshi Fujiwara
  • Mitsuhiro Kawata
  • Toshikazu Kubo
Original Article



Grafting bone between the tendon graft and the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the mechanical strength of the tendon graft. However, the biological role of the bone graft is unclear. The purpose of this research was to elucidate the role of bone graft cells after autologous tendon graft into the bone tunnel with an autologous bone graft in green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic rats.


The Achilles tendons of Sprague-Dawley (SD) wild-type rats and bone of GFP rats were harvested and transplanted into bone tunnels drilled in the femurs at the knees of SD rats. The femurs were harvested at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after transplantation and histologically investigated using hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining of heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), macrophages, and type I and type III collagens. Biomechanical tests were performed on the tendon graft 2 and 4 weeks after transplantation to evaluate the ultimate force to failure.


A small number of GFP-positive cells was seen in the tendon graft 2 weeks after transplantation. The cell count in the tendon graft was increased at 4 weeks after transplantation. HSP47-positive cells and macrophage-stained cells present in the tendon graft corresponded with the GFP-positive cells. By 2 weeks after transplantation, the relative areas of immunostained type I and III collagens in the tendon graft had declined significantly in the bone graft group compared to the control. The ultimate failure load in the bone graft group was higher than that in the control group at both 2 and 4 weeks after transplantation.


This research showed that, within 4 weeks of transplantation, bone graft cells migrate to the tendon graft, where they differentiate into cells involved in collagen production and macrophages. Bone graft cells may contribute to the early stage remodeling of tendon grafts.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Rosenberg TD, Deffner KT. ACL reconstruction: semitendinosus tendon is the graft of choice. Orthopedics. 1997;20:396–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hara K, Arai Y, Ohta M, Minami G, Urade H, Hirai N, Watanabe N, Kubo T. A new double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the posteromedial portal technique with hamstrings. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju YJ, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:618–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:21–34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnoczky SP, Tarvin GB, Marshall JL. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement using patellar tendon. An evaluation of graft revascularization in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:217–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Akeson WH. The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament autograft of patellar tendon origin. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:449–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shino K, Kawasaki T, Hirose H, Gotoh I, Inoue M, Ono K. Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament by an allogeneic tendon graft. An experimental study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;66:672–81.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blickenstaff KR, Grana WA, Egle D. Analysis of a semitendinosus autograft in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:554–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y. ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;407:313–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito T, Suzuki A, Okabe M, Imai E, Hori M. Application of bone marrow-derived stem cells in experimental nephrology. Exp Nephrol. 2001;9:444–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watanabe N, Takai S, Morita N, Kawata M, Hirasawa Y. A method of tracking donor cells after simulated autologous transplantation: a study using synovial cells of transgenic rats. Cell Tissue Res. 1999;298:519–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oshima Y, Watanabe N, Matsuda K, Takenaka N, Kawata M, Takai S. Behavior of graft and host cells in underlying subchondral bone after transplantation of osteochondral autograft. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;58:19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi M, Watanabe N, Oshima Y, Kajikawa Y, Kawata M, Kubo T. The fate of host and graft cells in early healing of bone tunnel after tendon graft. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1892–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tachiiri H, Morihara T, Iwata Y, Yoshida A, Kajikawa Y, Kida Y, Matsuda K, Fujiwara H, Kurokawa M, Kawata M, Kubo T. Characteristics of donor and host cells in the early remodeling process after transplant of Achilles tendon with and without live cells for the treatment of rotator cuff defect—what is the ideal graft for the treatment of massive rotator cuff defects? J Should Elbow Surg. 2010;19:891–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dovan TT, Ritty T, Ditsios K, Silva MJ, Kusano N, Gelberman RH. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon to bone tunnel repair: a vascularization and histologic study in canines. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:246–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arai Y, Hara K, Takahashi T, Urade H, Minami G, Takamiya H, Kubo T. Evaluation of the vascular status of autogenous hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in humans using magnetic resonance angiography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:342–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yukata K, Matsui Y, Shukunami C, Takimoto A, Hirohashi N, Ohtani O, Kimura T, Hiraki Y, Yasui N. Differential expression of tenomodulin and chondromodulin-1 at the insertion site of the tendon reflects a phenotypic transition of the resident cells. Tissue Cell. 2010;42(2):116–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Howell SM, Roos P, Hull ML. Compaction of a bone dowel in the tibial tunnel improves the fixation stiffness of a soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study in calf tibia. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:719–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    To JT, Howell SM, Hull ML. Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacements at implantation. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:379–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masuda H, Hosokawa N, Nagata K. Expression and localization of collagen-binding stress protein Hsp47 in mouse embryo development: comparison with types I and III collagen. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1998;3:256–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagata K. Expression and function of heat shock protein 47: a collagen-specific molecular chaperone in the endoplasmic reticulum. Matrix Biol. 1998;16:379–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kawamura S, Ying L, Kim HJ, Dynybil C, Rodeo SA. Macrophages accumulate in the early phase of tendon–bone healing. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1425–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hays PL, Kawamura S, Deng XH, Dagher E, Mithoefer K, Ying L, Rodeo SA. The role of macrophages in early healing of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:565–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goradia VK, Rochat MC, Kida M, Grana WA. Natural history of a hamstring tendon autograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a sheep model. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(1):40–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cypher TJ, Grossman JP. Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:413–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kajikawa Y, Morihara T, Watanabe N, Sakamoto H, Matsuda K, Kobayashi M, Oshima Y, Yoshida A, Kawata M, Kubo T. GFP chimeric models exhibited a biphasic pattern of mesenchymal cell invasion in tendon healing. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210:684–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tohyama H, Yasuda K, Uchida H. Is the increase in type III collagen of the patellar tendon graft after ligament reconstruction really caused by “ligamentization” of the graft? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1270–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroto Komiyama
    • 1
  • Yuji Arai
    • 1
  • Yoshihiko Kajikawa
    • 1
  • Atsuhiko Yoshida
    • 1
  • Toru Morihara
    • 1
  • Ryu Terauchi
    • 1
  • Yoshikazu Kida
    • 1
  • Hiroyoshi Fujiwara
    • 1
  • Mitsuhiro Kawata
    • 2
  • Toshikazu Kubo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical ScienceKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations