Fabrication and growth mechanism of ZnO nanostructures and their cytotoxic effect on human brain tumor U87, cervical cancer HeLa, and normal HEK cells

  • Rizwan Wahab
  • Nagendra K. Kaushik
  • Akhilesh K. Verma
  • Anurag Mishra
  • I. H. Hwang
  • You-Bing Yang
  • Hyung-Shik Shin
  • Young-Soon KimEmail author
Original Paper


ZnO nanostructures of diverse shape were grown via a solution process with different precursors and conditions. Morphological investigation of the nanostructures was carried out using field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission microscopy observations and revealed that the nanostructures exhibit a wurtzite phase with an ideal lattice fringe distance of approximately 0.52 nm. The powder crystallinity was examined via X-ray diffraction spectroscopy. Screening results from anticancer studies of the effects on human brain tumor U87, cervical cancer HeLa, and normal HEK cells of ZnO nanostructures of diverse shape were obtained and indicate promising activity that varies with changes in the structure and the size of the particles. Treatment-induced cell death [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and survival assay], growth inhibition, cytogenetic damage (formation of micronuclei), and apoptosis were studied as parameters for the cellular response. Treatment with nanostructures enhanced growth inhibition and cell death in a concentration-dependent manner in both U87 and HeLa cell lines. At higher concentrations (above 15.6 μg/ml) the cytotoxic effects of the nanoparticles were highly synergistic and mainly mediated through apoptosis, implying the possible interactions of lesions caused by the agents. The enhanced cell death due to nanoparticles was accompanied by a significant increase (2–3 fold at 31.25 μg/ml) in the formation of micronuclei in U87 cells. The increase in the formation of micronuclei observed after treatment indicates that these structures may interfere with the rejoining of DNA strand breaks. Among all the nanostructures, nanoparticles and sheets exhibited potent activity against both HeLa and U87 cells. However, despite potent in vitro activity, all nanostructures exhibited diminished cytotoxicity against normal human HEK cells at all effective concentrations.


Micronuclei Zinc oxide nanostructures Human brain tumor Cervical cancer 



Rizwan Wahab would like to acknowledge a grant from the Post Doc Program, Chonbuk National University. We would also like to thank Mr. Kang Jong-Gyun, Center for University-wide Research Facilities, Chonbuk National University, for his cooperation in TEM observations and the KBSI (Korea Basic Science Institute), Jeonju branch, for letting us use its FESEM facility.


  1. 1.
    Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose S, Li JJ et al (2005) Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging and diagnostic. Science 307:538–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith AM, Duan H, Mohs AM, Nie S (2008) Bioconjugated quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1226–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rhyner MN, Smith AM, Gao X, Mao H, Yang L, Nie S (2006) Quantum dots and multi functional nanoparticles: new contrast agents for tumor imaging. Nanomedicine 1:209–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laval JM, Mazeran PE, Thomas D (1999) Nanobiotechnology and its role in the develop ment of new analytical devices. Analyst 125:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desai TA (2001) Micro- and nanoscale structures for tissue engineering construct. Med Eng Phys 22(9):595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer LA, Birenbaum NS, Meyer GJ (2004) Biological applications of high aspect ratio nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 14:517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazzola L (2003) Commercializing nanotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 21:1137–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grzelczac M, Juste JP, Mulvaney P, Marzan LML (2008) Shape control in gold nano particle synthesis. Chem Soc Rev 37:1783–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghosh P, Han G, De M, Kim CK, Rotello VM (2008) Gold nanoparticles in delivery application. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1307–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fortin JP, Wilhelm C, Servais J, Menager C, Bacri JC, Gazeau F (2007) Size-sorted anionic iron oxide nanomagnets as colloidal mediators for magnetic hyperthermia. J Am Chem Soc 129:2628–2635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lim YT, Cho MY, Choi BS, Lee JM, Chung BH (2008) Paramagnetic gold nano structures for dual modal bioimaging and phototherapy of cancer cells. Chem Commun 4930–4932Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu CJ, Wang BD, Sun SH (2009) Dumbbell-like Au–Fe3O4 nanoparticles for target specific platin delivery. J Am Chem Soc 131:4216–4217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jamieson T, Bakhshi R, Petrova D, Pocock R, Imani M, Seifalian AH (2007) Biological applications of quantum dots. Biomaterials 28:4717–4732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Y, Bangall DM, Koh HJ, Park KT, Hiraga K, Zhu Z, Yao T (1998) Plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy of ZnO on c-plane sapphire: growth and characterization. J Appl Phys 84:3912–3918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jin BJ, Bae SH, Lee SY, Im S (2000) Effects of native defects on optical and electrical properties of ZnO prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Mater Sci Eng B 71:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chung SW, Yu JY, Health JR (2000) Silicon nanowire devices. Appl Phys Lett 76:2068–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lieri GS, Groppelli S, Nelli P, Tintinelli A, Giunta G (1995) A novel method for the preparation of NH3 sensors based on ZnO-In thin films. Sens Actuators B 25:588–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang ZL (2004) Nanostructure of ZnO. Mater Today 7:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das NC, Upreti S, Sokol PE (2010) Small angle neutron scattering and photoluminescence property of wet chemistry process synthesised ZnO nanoparticles. J Exp Nanosci 5:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pan WZ, Dai RZ, Wang ZL (2001) Nanobelts of semiconducting oxides. Science 291:1947–1949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lao JY, Huang JY, Wang DZ, Ren ZF (2003) ZnO nanobridges and nano nails. Nano Lett 3(2):235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xing YJ, Xi ZH, Xue ZQ, Zhang XD, Song JH, Wang RM, Xu J, Song Y, Zhang L, Yu DP (2003) Optical properties of the ZnO nanotubes synthesized via vapor phase growth. Appl Phys Lett 83:1689–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu JQ, Bando Y (2003) Growth and optical properties of single-crystal tubular ZnO whiskers. Appl Phys Lett 82:1401–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zahang H, Yang D, Li D, Ma X, Li S, Que D (2005) Controllable growth of ZnO microcrystals by a capping-molecule-assisted hydrothermal process. J Cryst Growth Des 5:547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ostrovsky S, Kazimirsky G, Gedanken A, Brodie C (2009) Selective cytotoxic effect of ZnO nanoparticles on glioma cells. Nano Res 2:882–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mosmann T (1883) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh AP, Kaushik NK, Verma AK, Hundal G, Gupta R (2009) Synthesis, structure and biological activity of copper(II) complexes of 4-(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,7-dimethyl-1,4,7-triazonane-2,6-dione and 4-(2-pyridylethyl)-1,7-dimethyl-1,4,7-triazonane-2,6-dione. Eur J Med Chem 44:1607–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh S, Dwarakanath BS, Mathew TL (2004) DNA ligand Hoechst-33342 enhances UV induced cytotoxicity in humanglioma cell lines. J Photochem Photobiol B 77:45–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Countryman PI, Heddle JA (1976) The production of micronuclei from chromosome aberrations in irradiated cultures of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 41:321–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yanagihara K, Nii M, Nuot K, Kamiya H, Tauchi S, Seito TS (1995) Radiation-induced apoptotic cell death in human gastric epithelial tumor cells; correlation between mitotic death and apoptosis. Int J Radiat Biol 77:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wahab R, Ansari SG, Kim YS, Seo HK, Kim GS, Khang G, Shin HS (2007) Low temperature solution synthesis and characterization of ZnO nano-flowers. Mater Res Bull 42:1640–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wahab R, Ansari SG, Kim YS, Seo HK, Shin HS (2007) Room temperature synthesis of needle-shaped ZnO nanorods via sonochemical method. Appl Surf Sci 25(3):7622–7626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wahab R, Ansari SG, Seo HK, Kim YS, Suh EK, Shin HS (2009) Low temperature synthesis and characterization of rosette like nanostructures of ZnO using solute on process. Solid State Sci 11:439–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wahab R, Ansari SG, Kim YS, Khang G, Shin HS (2008) Effect of hydroxylamine hydrochloride on the floral decoration of zinc oxide synthesized by solution method. Appl Surf Sci 254:2037–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wahab R, Kim YS, Shin HS (2009) Synthesis, characterization and effect of pH variation on zinc oxide nanostructures. Mater Trans 8:2092–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wahab R, Kim YS, Hwang IH, Shin HS (2009) A non-aqueous synthesis, characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their interaction with DNA. Synth Met 159:2443–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wahab R, Mishra A, Yun SI, Kim YS, Shin HS (2010) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles prepared via non-hydrolytic solution route. Appl Microb Biotechnol 87:1917–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li WJ, Shi EW, Zhong WZ, Yin ZW (1999) Growth mechanism and growth habit of oxide crystals. J Cryst Growth 203:186–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gao PX, Wang ZL (2004) Substrate atomic-termination induced anisotropic growth of ZnO nanowires/nanorods by VLS process. J Phys Chem B 108:7534–7537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gao PX, Wang ZL (2004) Nanopropeller arrays of zinc oxide. Appl Phys Lett 84:2883–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gao PX, Wang ZL (2002) Self-assembled nanowire-nanoribbon junction arrays of ZnO. J Phys Chem B 106:12653–12658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wahab R, Kim YS, Seoup K, Shin HS (2010) Fabrication and growth mechanism of hexagonal zinc oxide nanorods via solution process. J Mater Sci 45:2967–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SBIC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rizwan Wahab
    • 1
  • Nagendra K. Kaushik
    • 2
  • Akhilesh K. Verma
    • 2
  • Anurag Mishra
    • 3
  • I. H. Hwang
    • 4
  • You-Bing Yang
    • 4
  • Hyung-Shik Shin
    • 1
  • Young-Soon Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Energy Materials and Surface Science Laboratory, Solar Energy Research Center, School of Chemical EngineeringChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Dr. B R Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research and Department of ChemistryUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of UlsanUlsanSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Animal Resources and BiotechnologyChonbuk National UniversityChonjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations