Advertisement

Comparing directly measured versus mathematically calculated free serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level in children

  • Judith Sebestyen VanSickleEmail author
  • Tarak Srivastava
  • Uttam Garg
  • Mohamed H. Rezaiekhaligh
  • Uri S. Alon
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. The majority of serum 25(OH)D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) (~ 85%) and to albumin (~ 15%), with only a miniscule amount circulating as free 25(OH)D. Free 25(OH)D can be calculated mathematically by Bikle method from the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin or measured directly by ELISA. A direct head-to-head comparison between the two methods has not been done in children.

Materials and methods

The objective of the study was to compare the mathematically calculated versus directly measured free 25(OH) vitamin D in children. Serum samples from 74 children (ages 1–19 years) were simultaneously analyzed for total 25(OH)D, serum albumin, VDBP, and free 25(OH)D. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement between the two methods.

Results

The mean age was 9.1 ± 5.1 years, with 61% boys, 76% Caucasians, and 24% African-Americans. The mean ± SD for total 25(OH)D was 38.7 ± 12.8 ng/mL, bioavailable 25(OH)D 3.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D 8.4 ± 3.2 pg/mL, and directly measured free 25(OH)D 8.9 ± 3.6 pg/mL. Pearson correlation reflected a significant correlation between mathematically calculated and directly measured free 25(OH)D (r = 0.66, p < 0.0005). Bland–Altman plot reflected a tight agreement within a 95% limit of agreement (mean = − 0.026 ± 2SD).

Conclusions

The directly measured and mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D are in close agreement and are interchangeable. Depending on the local availability of instruments and methods, free 25(OH)D can be either directly measured or mathematically calculated.

Keywords

Vitamin D Free 25(OH)D Bone metabolism 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Holick MF (2004) Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1678S–1688S.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1678S CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tietz N (1976) Fundamentals of chemistry. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 335–337Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cauley JA, Danielson ME, Boudreau R, Barbour KE, Horwitz MJ, Bauer DC, Ensrud KE, Manson JE, Wactawski-Wende J, Shikany JM, Jackson RD (2011) Serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D and clinical fracture risk in a multiethnic cohort of women: the women’s health initiative (WHI). J Bone Miner Res 26:2378–2388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powe CE, Ricciardi C, Berg AH, Erdenesanaa D, Collerone G, Ankers E, Wenger J, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani R, Bhan I (2011) Vitamin D-binding protein modifies the vitamin D-bone mineral density relationship. J Bone Miner Res. 26:1609–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Denburg MR, Kalkwarf HJ, de Boer IH, Hewison M, Shults J, Zemel BS, Stokes D, Foerster D, Laskin B, Ramirez A, Leonard MB (2013) Vitamin bioavailability and catabolism in pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 28:1843–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM (1999) “A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3666–3672.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.10.6079 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bikle Daniel, Bouillon Roger, Thadhani Ravi, Schoenmakers Inez (2017) Vitamin D metabolites in captivity? Should we measure free or total 25(OH)D to assess vitamin D status? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 173:105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.01.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivastava T, Garg U, Ruiz M, Dai H, Alon US (2013) Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D level in children: is there a need to change the reference range based on 2011 institute of medicine report? Clin Pediatr 52:178–182.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922811425954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Sheng Z, Meng L, Su C, Trooskin S, Shapses SA (2019) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D binding protein levels in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroidectomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 10:171.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00171 (Published 2019 Mar 27) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz JB, Lai J, Lizaola B, Kane L, Markova S, Weyland P, Terrault NA, Stotland N, Bikle D (2014) A comparison of measured and calculated free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:1631–1637.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3874 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopez-Molina M, Santillan C, Murillo M, Valls AM, Bosch L, Bel J, Granada ML (2018) Measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in healthy children and relationship to total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D binding protein. Clin Biochem 61:23–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.08.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society Bone and Mineral Research and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of NephrologyChildren’s Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologyChildren’s Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas CityKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations