Positive association between serum uric acid and bone mineral density in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by gender and BMI
- 430 Downloads
Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that serum uric acid (UA), a natural powerful antioxidant, plays a beneficial role in bone health in the general population. However, few reports are available on the association between serum UA and bone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We therefore investigated whether the benefit of serum UA for bone health was still present in those patients. 626 males and 609 postmenopausal females with T2DM were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Serum UA concentrations and bone mineral density (BMD) measured at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were obtained from all subjects. Meanwhile, data on osteoporosis prevalence, glucose metabolism, bone turnover markers and other serum biochemical indexes were collected. After adjustment for potential confounders, the results suggested that serum UA was positively associated with BMD in patients with normal weight, but this positive association varied by gender and skeletal sites in overweight T2DM patients [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2]. Moreover, significantly lower odds ratios (ORs) for osteoporosis were found in postmenopausal patients with the highest UA tertile and male patients with medium UA tertile [adjusted OR 0.315, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.170–0.581 for postmenopausal patients; adjusted OR 0.464, 95% CI 0.225–0.955 for male patients]. The positive association between serum UA and BMD found in Chinese T2DM patients may imply that relatively high UA is a protective factor for bone in these patients. Large intervention studies are needed to further confirm the outcomes and provide possible explanations.
KeywordsUric acid Type 2 diabetes mellitus Bone mineral density Osteoporosis BMI
This study was supported by Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (13ZR1432100), National High Technology Research and Development Program (2013AA032203) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81500650).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
- 8.Kim BJ, Baek S, Ahn SH, Kim SH, Jo MW, Bae SJ, Kim HK, Choe J, Park GM, Kim YH, Lee SH, Kim GS, Koh JM (2014) Higher serum uric acid as a protective factor against incident osteoporotic fractures in Korean men: a longitudinal study using the National Claim Registry. Osteoporos Int 25:1837–1844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Veronese N, Carraro S, Bano G, Trevisan C, Solmi M, Luchini C, Manzato E, Caccialanza R, Sergi G, Nicetto D, Cereda E (2016) Hyperuricemia protects against low bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest 46:920–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Almeida M (2012) Aging mechanisms in bone. Bonekey Rep 1Google Scholar
- 25.Hayes Andrew F (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 29.Bonora E, Targher G, Zenere MB, Saggiani F, Cacciatori V, Tosi F, Travia D, Zenti MG, Branzi P, Santi L, Muggeo M (1996) Relationship of uric acid concentration to cardiovascular risk factors in young men. Role of obesity and central fat distribution. The Verona young men atherosclerosis risk factors study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:975–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Takir M, Kostek O, Ozkok A, Elcioglu OC, Bakan A, Erek A, Mutlu HH, Telci O, Semerci A, Odabas AR, Afsar B, Smits G, Lanaspa AM, Sharma S, Johnson RJ, Kanbay M (2015) Lowering uric acid with allopurinol improves insulin resistance and systemic inflammation in asymptomatic hyperuricemia. J Investig Med 63:924–929CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, Peterson JM, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Bouxsein ML, Khosla S (2004) Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 19:1945–1954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Abrahamsen B, Stilgren LS, Hermann AP, Tofteng CL, Barenholdt O, Vestergaard P, Brot C, Nielsen SP (2001) Discordance between changes in bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites in perimenopausal women–implications for assessment of bone loss and response to therapy: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1212–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar