Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius—prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI
- 458 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the combination of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone mass and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based cortical and trabecular structural measures improves the prediction of radial bone strength. Thirty-eight left forearms were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius were measured using DXA. Cortical and trabecular structural measures of the distal radius were computed in high-resolution 1.5T MR images. Cortical measures included average cortical thickness and cross-sectional area. Trabecular measures included morphometric and texture parameters. The forearms were biomechanically tested in a fall simulation to measure absolute radial bone strength (failure load). Relative radial bone strength was determined by dividing radial failure loads by age, body mass index, radius length, and average radius cross-sectional area, respectively. DXA derived BMC and BMD showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations with absolute and relative radial bone strength (r ≤ 0.78). Correlation coefficients for cortical and trabecular structural measures with absolute and relative radial bone strength amounted up to r = 0.59 and r = 0.74, respectively, (p < 0.05). In combination with DXA-based bone mass, trabecular but not, cortical structural measures, added in multiple regression models significant (p < 0.05) information in predicting absolute and relative radial bone strength (up to R adj = 0.88). Thus, a combination of DXA-based bone mass and MRI-based trabecular structural measures most accurately predicted absolute and relative radial bone strength, whereas structural measures of the cortex did not provide significant additional information in combination with DXA.
KeywordsOsteoporosis Radius DXA MRI
This work was supported by grants of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG LO 730/3-1 and DFG BA 4085/1-2).
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Highlights of the conference. South Med J 94:569–573Google Scholar
- 5.Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, Kennedy CC, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Goltzman D, Thabane L, Gafni A, Papadimitropoulos EA, Brown JP, Josse RG, Hanley DA, Adachi JD (2009) Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ 181:265–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Haentjens P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Bouillon R, Cooper C, Lamraski G, Vanderschueren D, Kaufman JM, Boonen S (2004) Evidence from data searches and life-table analyses for gender-related differences in absolute risk of hip fracture after Colles’ or spine fracture: colles’ fracture as an early and sensitive marker of skeletal fragility in white men. J Bone Miner Res 19:1933–1944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bonel HM, Lochmuller EM, Well H, Kuhn V, Hudelmaier M, Reiser M, Eckstein F (2004) Multislice computed tomography of the distal radius metaphysis: relationship of cortical bone structure with gender, age, osteoporotic status, and mechanical competence. J Clin Densitom 7:169–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hudelmaier M, Kuhn V, Lochmuller EM, Well H, Priemel M, Link TM, Eckstein F (2004) Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)? Osteoporos Int 15:375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia G, Hyun BH, Jobke B, Banerjee S, Huber M, Link TM, Majumdar S (2008) Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo. Osteoporos Int 19:653–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lam SC, Wald MJ, Rajapakse CS, Liu Y, Saha PK, Wehrli FW (2011) Performance of the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in the distal radius: serial reproducibility and reliability of structural and mechanical parameters in women representative of osteoporosis study populations. Bone 49:895–903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mueller D, Link TM, Monetti R, Bauer J, Boehm H, Seifert-Klauss V, Rummeny EJ, Morfill GE, Raeth C (2006) The 3D-based scaling index algorithm: a new structure measure to analyze trabecular bone architecture in high-resolution MR images in vivo. Osteoporos Int 17:1483–1493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, Newitt DC, Truong VH, Lin JC, Mathur A (1997) Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 12:111–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, Huber MB, Muller D, Monetti R, Rath C, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Majumdar S, Rummeny EJ, Link TM, Bauer JS (2010) Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur–prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA. Osteoporos Int 21:1553–1564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Ladinsky GA, Vasilic B, Popescu AM, Wald M, Zemel BS, Snyder PJ, Loh L, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC, Wehrli FW (2008) Trabecular structure quantified with the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in postmenopausal women contributes to vertebral deformity burden independent of areal vertebral BMD. J Bone Miner Res 23:64–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Chesnut CH III, Majumdar S, Newitt DC, Shields A, Van PJ, Laschansky E, Azria M, Kriegman A, Olson M, Eriksen EF, Mindeholm L (2005) Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study. J Bone Miner Res 20:1548–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Wehrli FW, Ladinsky GA, Jones C, Benito M, Magland J, Vasilic B, Popescu AM, Zemel B, Cucchiara AJ, Wright AC, Song HK, Saha PK, Peachey H, Snyder PJ (2008) In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol. J Bone Miner Res 23:730–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Augat P, Schorlemmer S (2006) The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age Ageing 35:ii27–ii31Google Scholar
- 42.Newitt DC, Majumdar S, van RB, von IG, Harris ST, Genant HK, Chesnut C, Garnero P, MacDonald B (2002) In vivo assessment of architecture and micro-finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius. Osteoporos Int 13:6–17Google Scholar
- 43.Mueller TL, Christen D, Sandercott S, Boyd SK, van RB, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Muller R, van Lenthe GH (2011) Computational finite element bone mechanics accurately predicts mechanical competence in the human radius of an elderly population. Bone 48:1232–1238Google Scholar