Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1029–1042 | Cite as

Ringing of the roll motion of a two-dimensional barge in focused wave groups

  • Peng Jin
  • Binzhen ZhouEmail author
  • Hengming Zhang
  • Lifen Chen
  • Liang ZhangEmail author
Original article
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

The ringing of a floating barge’s roll motion under focused wave groups is studied using a fully nonlinear method in a numerical wave tank based on the potential flow theory. The higher order boundary element method (HOBEM) is used to solve the boundary value problem. The mixed Eulerian–Lagrangian (MEL) technique and the fourth-order Runge–Kutta time stepping scheme is used to simulate the interaction between the floating barge and focused wave groups. As the peak spectra frequency is set as one-third of the natural frequency of the barge’s roll motion, the influence of the peak wave amplitude of the incident focused wave groups on the roll response of the barge and wave loads is studied. The third-order components are found to be significant in both roll motion and moment as the incident peak wave amplitude increases. Relationship between the roll response of the barge and the peak spectrum frequency of the incident focused wave groups is also studied. The peak of the third-order roll response of the barge is found to decrease greatly as the triple peak spectral frequency deviates from the roll natural frequency.

Keywords

Ringing Barge/wave interaction Roll motion Fully nonlinear theory Focused wave group Higher harmonic forces 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409066, 51761135013), the High Technology Ship Scientific Research Project from Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China-Floating Security Platform Project (the second stage, 201622), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central University (HEUCF180104, HEUCFP201809), the China Scholarship Council (the International Clean Energy Talent Programme, 2017). This work is also supported by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation (LRF) through the joint centre involving University College London, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Harbin Engineering University. The LRF helps to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement and the application of research.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu X, Tao L, Li Y (2005) Nonlinear roll damping of ship motion in waves. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 127(3):205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Francescutto A, Contento G (1999) Bifurcations in ship rolling: experimental results and parameter identification technique. Ocean Eng 26(11):1095–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cointe R, Geyer P (1990) Nonlinear and linear motions of a rectangular barge in a perfect fluid. In: Proceedings of 18th symposium naval hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Contento G (2000) Numerical wave tank computations of nonlinear motions of 2D arbitrarily shaped floating bodies. Int J Ocean Eng 27:531–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koo W, Kim KH (2004) Freely floating-body simulation by a 2D fully nonlinear numerical wave tank. Ocean Eng 31(16):2011–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen LF, Sun L, Zang J, Hillis AJ, Plummer AR (2016) Numerical study of roll motion of a 2-D floating structure in viscous flow. J Hydrodyn 28(4):544–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung KH, Chang KA, Jo HJ (2006) Viscous effect on the roll motion of a rectangular structure. J Eng Mech 132(2):190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papanikolaou A (1987) On calculations of the nonlinear wave–body interaction effects. In: Proceedings of IUTAM international symposium on nonlinear water waves, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papanikolaou (1988) On the solution of the quasi-third order problem of two-dimensional cylinders in forced motion. J Kansai Soc Nav Archit 210:101–133Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanizawa K (1995) A nonlinear simulation method of 3-D body motions in waves (1st report). J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 178:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanizawa K, Naito S (1997) A study on parametric roll motions by fully nonlinear numerical wave tank. Proc ISOPE Conf 3(4):69–75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Report from the ringing joint industry project (1993) Higher order wave load effects on large volume structures. Task2, interpretation of existing measurements. Project Memo. MT51-F93-0100. Marintek Sintef Group, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaplin JR, Rainey RCT, Yemm RW (1997) Ringing of a vertical cylinder in waves. J Fluid Mech 350:119–147MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scolan YM, Le Boulluec M, Chen XB, Deleuil G, Ferrant P, Malenica S, Molin B (1997) Some results from numerical and experimental investigations on the high frequency responses of offshore structures. In: Proceedings of BOSS’97, Delft, NetherlandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu X, Newman JN (1997) A higher-order panel method for third-harmonic diffraction problems. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grue J, Bjorshol G, Strand O (1994) Nonlinear wave loads which may generate ‘ringing’ response of offshore structures. In: 9th international WWWFB, Japan, pp 77–81Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huseby M, Grue J (2000) An experimental investigation of higher-harmonic wave forces on a vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mech 414:75–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grue J, Huseby M (2002) Higher-harmonic wave forces and ringing of vertical cylinders. Appl Ocean Res 24:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faltinsen OM, Newman JN, Vinje T (1995) Nonlinear wave loads on a slender vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mech 289:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malenica S, Molin B (1995) Third-harmonic wave diffraction by a vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mech 302:203–229MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teng, Kato S (2002) Third order wave force on axisymmetric bodies. Ocean Eng 29:815–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paulsen T, Bredmose H, Bingham HB, Jacobsen NG (2014) Forcing of a bottom-mounted circular cylinder by steep regular water waves at finite depth. J Fluid Mech 755:1–34MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou BZ, Wu GX, Teng B (2015) Fully nonlinear wave interaction with freely floating non-wall-sided structures. Eng Anal Bound Elem 50:117–132MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou Z, Wu GX (2015) Resonance of a tension leg platform excited by third harmonic force in nonlinear regular waves. Philos Trans R Soc A 373:20140105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou BZ, Wu L, Xu GD, Zhang L (2017) Resonance of the roll motion of a two dimensional barge induced by triple frequency wave force. Ocean Eng 134:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thornton ST, Marion JB (2003) Classical dynamics of particles and systems, 5th edition. Cengage Learning, pp 440–447Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu GX, Taylor RE (1996) Transient motion of a floating body in steep water waves. In: 11th international WWWFB, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu GX, Taylor RE (2003) The coupled finite element and boundary element analysis of nonlinear interactions between waves and bodies. Ocean Eng 30:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goda Y (1998) Perturbation analysis of nonlinear wave interactions in relatively shallow water. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on hydrodynamics, Seoul, pp 33–51Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chaplin JR (1996) On frequency-focusing unidirectional waves. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 6(2):131–137Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bai W, Taylor RE (2007) Numerical simulation of fully nonlinear regular and focused wave diffraction around a vertical cylinder using domain decomposition. Appl Ocean Res 29:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ning Z, Zang J, Liu SX, Taylor RE, Teng B, Taylor PH (2009) Free-surface evolution and wave kinematics for nonlinear uni-directional focused wave groups. Ocean Eng 36(15):1226–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baldock TE, Swan C, Taylor PH (1996) A laboratory study of nonlinear surface waves on water. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 354:649–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Contento G, Codiglia R, D’Este F (2001) Nonlinear effects in transient non-breaking waves in a closed flume. Appl Ocean Res 23(1):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stagonas E, Buldacov, Simons R (2014) Focusing unidirectional wave groups on finite water depth with and without currents. In: Coastal engineering proceedings, Seoul, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fitzgerald C, Taylor PH, Taylor RE, Grice J, Zang J (2014) Phase manipulation and the harmonic components of ringing forces on a surface piercing column. Proc R Soc Lond A 470(2168):20130847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vyzikas T, Stagonas D, Buldakov E, Greaves D (2018) The evolution of free and bound waves during dispersive focusing in a numerical and physical flume. Coast Eng 132:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen LF, Zang J, Hillis AJ, Morgan GCJ, Plummer AR (2014) Numerical investigation of wave–structure interaction using OpenFOAM. Ocean Eng 88(5):91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Molin B (2002) Hydrodynamique des structures offshore. Guides Prat. Sur Les. Ouvtages En. Mer., (TECHNIP, editor)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen. LF, Zang J, Taylor PH, Sun L, Morgan GCJ, Grice J, Orszaghova J, Ruiz MT (2018) An experimental decomposition of nonlinear forces on surface-piercing column: stokes-type expansions of the force harmonics. J Fluid Mech 848:42–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Shipbuilding EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, School of Civil Environmental and Mining EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations