Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 359–371 | Cite as

An experimental study of double-row floating breakwaters

  • Chunyan Ji
  • Xiaokang Deng
  • Yong ChengEmail author
Original article


A preliminary experimental study on the hydrodynamic behaviors of double-row floating breakwaters is carried out in a wave flume under regular wave action. The floating breakwater chosen as the experimental subject is a dual rectangular pontoon floating breakwater. The hydrodynamic behaviors of the floating breakwater are validated through the calculation of the wave transmission coefficients, the wave reflection coefficients, the motion responses of the floating breakwaters and the mooring forces for different waves and structural parameters. The dynamic responses of single-row floating breakwater as a control group are also examined in the present experiments. The results indicate that double-row floating breakwaters significantly reduces the transmission coefficients as compared with single-row floating breakwater, especially for short-period wave, which is attributed to dissipation caused by eddies and moon-pool effect. However, the reflection performance is almost identical between two types. It is also found that the motion responses of the single-row and double-row floating breakwaters are similar. Spacing distance between double-row floating breakwaters has a significant influence on the windward mooring tension of the model at the upstream location, which always keeps the largest level in all mooring forces.


Double-row floating breakwaters Model experiment Wave attenuating performance Motion responses Mooring forces 



Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) (Grant nos. 51579122, 51622902, 51609109), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. BK20160556), University Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. 16kjd70003) and Key Lab Foundation for Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. CJ1506).


  1. 1.
    Arunachalam VM, Raman H (1982) Experimental studies on a perforated horizontal floating plate breakwater. Ocean Eng 9(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sannasiraj SA, Sundar V, Sundaravadivelu R (1998) Mooring forces and motion responses of pontoon-type floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 25(1):27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayram A (2000) Experimental study of a sloping floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 27(4):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahman MA, Mizutani N, Kawasaki K (2006) Numerical modeling of dynamic responses and mooring forces of submerged floating breakwater. Coast Eng 53(10):799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong GH, Zheng YN, Li YC, Teng B et al (2008) Experiments on wave transmission coefficients of floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 35(8):931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang HY, Sun ZC (2010) Experimental study of a porous floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 37(5):520–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ozeren Y, Wre DG, Altinaka M, Work PA (2011) Experimental investigation of cylindrical floating breakwater performance with various mooring configurations. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 137(6):300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koraima AS, Rageh OS (2013) Effect of under connected plates on the hydrodynamic efficiency of the floating breakwater. China Ocean Eng 28(3):349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferreras J, Peña E, López A, López F (2014) Structural performance of a floating breakwater for different mooring line typologies. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 140(3):158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams AN, Abul-Azm AG (1997) Dual pontoon floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 24(5):465–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murali K, Mani JS (1998) Performance of cage floating breakwater. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 123(4):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peña E, Ferreras J, Sanchez-Tembleque F (2011) Experimental study on wave transmission coefficient, mooring lines and module connector forces with different designs of floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 38(10):1150–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji CY, Chen X, Cui J, Yuan ZM et al (2015) Experimental study of a new type of floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 105:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ji CY, Chen X, Cui J et al (2016) Experimental study on configuration optimization of floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 117:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ji CY, GUO YC, Cui J, Yuan ZM, Ma XJ et al (2016) 3D experimental study on a cylindrical floating breakwater system. Ocean Eng 125:38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ji CY, Cheng Y, Yang K, Oleg G (2017) Numerical and experimental investigation of hydrodynamic performance of a cylindrical dual pontoon-net floating breakwater. Coastal Eng 129:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams AN (1993) Dual floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 20(3):215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abul-Azm AG (1994) Wave diffraction by double flexible breakwaters. Applied Ocean Research 16(2):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rao S, Rao NBS, Sathyanarayana VS (1999) Laboratory investigation on wave transmission through two rows of perforated hollow piles. Ocean Eng 26(7):675–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goda Y, Suzuki Y (1976) Estimation of incident and reflected waves in random wave experiments. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE, 828–845Google Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Naval Architecture and Ocean EngineeringJiangsu University of Science and TechnologyZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations