Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 376–393 | Cite as

Directional stability of a ship in close proximity to channel wall

Original article

Abstract

Ship maneuvering motions are affected by so-called bank suction forces when proceeding in close proximity to channel wall. In fact, some rudder angles would be required to maintain the course and proper rudder activities are needed to be directionally stable. The authors conducted captive model tests in a channel with variations in water depth, off-centerline displacement, ship speed, hull drift angle and rudder angle. The shallow water and bank effects on the hydrodynamic force characteristics were investigated. Based on the regression mathematical model, the rudder angle and hull drift angle required at equilibrium conditions were estimated and the limiting off-centerline displacement for safe operation was proposed. Directional stability in the channel was also studied based on the eigenvalue analysis and dynamic maneuvering motion simulations. The stable/unstable zone for course keeping according to control system characteristics would be important for the maneuvering operation.

Keywords

Directional stability Equilibrium condition Bank effect Shallow water effect 

List of symbols

\(m\)

Ship mass (kg)

\(I_{\rm z}\)

Yaw moment of inertia (kg m\(^2\))

\(m_{11}\)

Added mass in surge (kg)

\(m_{22}\)

Added mass in sway (kg)

\(m_{26}\)

Added mass coupled between sway and yaw (kg m)

\(m_{66}\)

Added moment of inertia in yaw (kg m\(^2\))

\(g\)

Gravity acceleration (ms\(^{-2}\))

\(L\)

Ship length between perpendiculars (m)

\(B\)

Ship breadth (m)

\(d\)

Ship draft (m)

\(x_{\rm G}\)

Longitudinal position of the center of gravity of ship (m)

\(\rho\)

Water density (kg m\(^{-3}\))

\(U\)

Ship speed (ms\(^{-1})\)

\(F_{\rm n}\)

Froude number \((U/\sqrt{gL})\)

\(u\)

Surge velocity (ms\(^{-1}\))

\(v\)

Sway velocity (ms\(^{-1}\))

\(r\)

yaw rate (s\(^{-1}\))

\(\psi\)

Heading angle

\(\beta\)

Hull drift angle

\(\delta\)

Rudder angle

\(\eta\)

Off-centerline displacement (m)

\(Y\)

Sway force (N)

\(N\)

Yaw moment around midship (Nm)

\(G_1\)

Proportional gain constant for rudder control

\(G_2\)

Differential gain constant for rudder control (s)

\(h\)

Water depth (m)

\(W\)

Channel width (m)

References

  1. 1.
    Norrbin NH (1974) Bank effects on a ship moving through a short dredged channel. In: Proceedings of the 10th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Cambridge, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norrbin NH (1985) Bank clearance and optimal section shape for ship canals. In: Proceedings of the 26th PIANC international navigation congress, Brussels, Section 1, Subject 1, pp 167–178Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ch’ng PW, Doctors LJ, Renilson MR (1993) A method of calculating the ship-bank interaction forces and moments in restricted water. Int Shipbuild Prog 40(421):7–23Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li DQ, Ottoson P, Tragardh P (2003) Prediction of bank effects by model tests and mathematical models. In: Proceedings of the international conference on marine simulation and ship maneuverability (MARSIMf03), Kanazawa, vol 3, pp 803–814Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vantorre M, Delefortrie G, Eloot K and Laforce E (2003) Experimental investigation of ship-bank interaction forces. In: Proceedings of the international conference on marine simulation and ship maneuverability (MARSIM’03), Kanazawa, vol 3, pp 815–823Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lataire E, Vantorre M (2008) Ship-bank interaction induced by irregular bank geometries. In: Proceedings of the 27th symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Seoul, vol 2, pp 511–524Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eloot K, Verwilligen J, Vantorre M (2007) A methodology for evaluating the controllability of a ship navigating in a restricted channel. Arch Civ Mech Eng 7(3):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yasukawa H, Kawamura S, Tanaka S, Sano M (2009) Evaluation of ship-bank and ship-ship interaction forces using a 3D panel method. In: Proceedings of the international conference on ship manoeuvring in shallow and confined water: bank effects, Antwerp, pp 127–133Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zou L, Larsson L, Delefortrie G, Lataire E (2011) CFD prediction and validation of ship-bank interaction in a canal. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on ship manoeuvring in shallow and confined water: ship to ship interaction, Trondheim, pp 413–422Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujino M (1968) Experimental studies on ship manoeuvrability in restricted waters—Part I. Int Shipbuild Prog 15(168):279–301Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fujino M (1970) Experimental studies on ship manoeuvrability in restricted waters—Part II. Int Shipbuild Prog 17(186):45–65Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eda H (1971) Directional stability and control of ships in restricted channels. In: Transactions of the society of naval architects and marine engineers(SNAME), vol 79, pp 71–116Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sano M, Yasukawa H, Hata H (2012) Experimental study on ship operation in close proximity to bank channel. In: Proceedings of the international conference on marine simulation and ship maneuverability (MARSIM 2012), Singapore (USB drive)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Newman JN (1977) Marine hydrodynamics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 132–140Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newman JN (1992) The green function for potential flow in a rectangular channel. J Eng Math 26:51–59CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.The 2nd Grade of Master’s Program, Graduate School of EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations