On the probability of underwater glider loss due to collision with a ship
- 450 Downloads
The demonstrated utility of underwater gliders as measurement platforms for the open ocean has sparked a growing interest in operating them in shallow coastal areas too. Underwater gliders face additional challenges in this environment, such as strong (tidal) currents and high shipping intensity. This work focuses on the probability of losing a glider through a collision with a ship. A ship density map is constructed for the German Bight from observed ship movements derived from automatic identification system data. A simple probability model is developed to convert ship densities into collision probabilities. More realistic—but also more computationally expensive—Monte Carlo simulations were carried out for verification. This model can be used to generate geographic maps showing the probability of glider loss due to collisions. Such maps are useful when planning glider missions. The method developed herein is also applicable to other types of AUVs.
KeywordsGliders Collision AIS German Bight
The author greatly appreciates the permission granted by D. Lekkas from the Department of Product and Systems Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Greece, to use data on ship positions (as obtained from the website http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais) in this study.
- 2.Brito M, Griffiths G, Challenor P (2010) Risk analysis for autonomous underwater vehicle operations in extreme environments. Risk Analysis 30:1771G1788. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01476.x
- 3.Davis R, Eriksen C, Jones C (2002) Autonomous buoyancy-driven underwater gliders. In: Griffiths G (ed) The technology and applications of autonomous underwater vehicles. Taylor and Francis, London, p 324Google Scholar
- 7.Kraus S (1990) Rates and potential causes of mortality in North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis. Mar Mammal Sci 6(4):278–291Google Scholar
- 8.Kundu P (1990) Fluid mechanics. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 10.MacDuff T (1974) The probability of vessel collisions. Ocean Industry Sept:144–148Google Scholar
- 14.Schlichting H, Gersten K (1999) Boundary layer theory, 8th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 15.Testor P, Meyers G, Pattiaratchi C, Bachmayer R, Hayes D, Pouliquen S, de la Villeon LP, Carval T, Ganachaud A, Gourdeau L, Mortier L, Claustre H, Taillandier V, Lherminier P, Terre T, Visbeck, Krahman G, Karstensen J, Alvarez A, Rixen M, Poulain P, Osterhus S, Tintore J, Ruiz S, Garau B, Smeed D, Griffiths G, Merckelbach L, Sherwin T, Schmid C, Barth J, Schofield O, Glenn S, Kohut J, Perry M, Eriksen C, Send U, Davis R, Rudnick D, Sherman J, Jones C, Webb D, Lee C, Owens B, Fratantoni D (2010) Gliders as a component of future observing systems. In: Hall J, Harrison D, Stammer D (eds) OceanObs’09: sustained ocean observations and information for society, OceansObs’09, vol. 2 (ESA Publication WPP-306). ESA, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tuck EO, Scullen DC, Lazauskas L (2002) Wave patterns and minimum wave resistance for high-speed vessels. In: Proceedings of 24th Symp Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, 8–13 July 2002Google Scholar