Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 345–358 | Cite as

Wave generation of a compartmented surface-effect ship

  • Lawrence J. Doctors
  • Alexander H. Day
  • David Clelland
  • Philip Beveridge
Original Article

Abstract

A series of carefully controlled experiments on the wave-generation characteristics of a model of a compartmented surface-effect ship has been conducted in a towing tank. Configurations of the model included cases encompassing one subcushion and two subcushions, as well as differing values of the pressures in the subcushions. It was shown that a reduced wave generation in the appropriate Froude number range could be achieved in this manner. Furthermore, a previously developed theory for the wave generation of marine vessels was verified for the model for a Froude number greater than 0.40.

Keywords

Surface-effect ships Wave generation Towing tank Model tests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Strathclyde for providing the Sir David Anderson Bequest Award, which supported travel and maintenance costs associated with this project, as well as the Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering for additional funding. We would also like to express our appreciation to Mr Charles Keay, Laboratory Coordinator, who supervised the construction of the model SES and the associated specialized equipment. Additionally, he oversaw the operation of the towing tank. Finally, we also respectfully acknowledge the infrastructure support provided by both the University of Strathclyde and The University of New South Wales (UNSW).

References

  1. 1.
    Doctors LJ, Renilson MR, Parker G, Hornsby N (1991) Waves and wave resistance of a high-speed river catamaran. In: Proceedings of first international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST ’91), Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, vol 1, pp 35–52, June 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fox K, Gornstein R, Stumbo S (1993) Wake wash: issues and answers. Society of naval architects and marine engineers, Pacific Northwest Section, 16+i pp, October 1993Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kofoed-Hansen H (1996) Technical investigation of wake wash from fast ferries, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark, 41+ii pp, December 1996Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuck EO, Lazauskas L (1998) Optimum hull spacing of a family of multihulls, University of Adelaide, Department of Applied Mathematics, 38 pp, May 1998Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lazauskas L, Tuck EO (1998) Wave cancellation by Weinblum-type catamarans and diamond-shaped tetrahulls. In: Proceedings of third biennial engineering mathematics and applications conference (EMAC ’98), Adelaide, South Australia, pp 299–302, July 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doctors LJ (1998) Development of low-wash vessels. In: Proceedings of third AusMarine conference (AusMarine ’98), Fremantle, Western Australia, pp 73–78, November 1998Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doctors LJ, Zilman G (2004) Environmental wave generation of high-speed marine vessels. In: Proceedings of twenty-fifth symposium on naval hydrodynamics, St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, 16 pp, August 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doctors LJ, Day AH (2000) Wave-free river-based air-cushion vehicles. In: Proceedings of international conference on hydrodynamics of high-speed craft: wake wash and motions control, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, England, pp 12.1–12.9, November 2000Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tuck EO, Scullen DC, Lazauskas L (2000) Ship-wave patterns in the spirit of Michell. In: Proceedings of IUTAM symposium on free-surface flows, Birmingham, England, 8 pp, July 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doctors LJ, Day AH (2001) The generation and decay of waves behind high-speed vessels. In: Proceedings of sixteenth international workshop on water waves and floating bodies (16 IWWWFB), Hiroshima, Japan, pp 33–36, April 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doctors LJ (2007) A test of linearity in the generation of ship waves. In: Proceedings of twenty-second international workshop on water waves and floating bodies (22 IWWWFB), Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, pp 61–64, April 2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Day AH, Doctors LJ (2001) Rapid estimation of near- and far-field wave wake from ships and application to hull form design and optimization. J Ship Res 45(1):73–84Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bassett AB (1888) Waves in a viscous fluid. In: A treatise on hydrodynamics. George Bell and Sons, Cambridge, pp 309–314Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zilman G, Miloh T (2001) Kelvin and V-like wakes affected by surfactants. J Ship Res 45(2):150–163Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tuck EO, Scullen DC, Lazauskas L (2002) Sea wave pattern evaluation. Part 6 report: viscosity factors, University of Adelaide, Department of Applied Mathematics, 14 pp, January 2002Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doctors LJ (2003) The influence of viscosity on the wavemaking of a model catamaran. In: Proceedings of eighteenth international workshop on water waves and floating bodies (18 IWWWFB), Le Croisic, France, pp 12-1–12-4, April 2003Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doctors LJ (1997) Optimal pressure distributions for river-based air-cushion vehicles. Ship Technol Res Schiffstechnik 44(1):32–36Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Day AH, Clelland D, Doctors LJ, Beveridge P (2010) Resistance of a compartmented surface-effect ship. J Ship Prod Des 26(3):1–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steen S, Adriaenssens C (2005) Experimental verification of the resistance of a split-cushion surface-effect ship. In: Proceedings of eighth international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST ’05), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 8 pp, June 2005Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beveridge P (2009) Design, build, test and analysis of a model SES with partitioned cushion arrangement. Bachelor thesis, University of Strathclyde, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 76 pp, May 2009Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bouvy A, Henn R, Henße J (2009) Acoustic wave height measurements in a towing facility. In: First international conference on advanced model measurement technology for the EU maritime industry (AMT ’09), Nantes, France, pp 310–324, September 2009Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doctors LJ (1993) On the use of pressure distributions to model the hydrodynamics of air-cushion vehicles and surface-effect ships. Nav Eng J 105(2):69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Doctors LJ, Tregde V, Jiang C, McKesson CB (2005) Optimization of a split-cushion surface-effect ship. In: Proceedings of eighth international conference on fast sea transportation (FAST ’05), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 8 pp, June 2005Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Doctors LJ, Macfarlane GJ, Young R (2007) A study of transom-stern ventilation. Int Shipbuild Prog 54(2,3):145–163Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Doctors LJ (2008) The unsteady growth of ship waves in a towing tank. In: Proceedings of twenty-third international workshop on water waves and floating bodies (23 IWWWFB), Jeju, Korea, pp 37–40, April 2008Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Doctors LJ, Sharma SD (1972) The wave resistance of an air-cushion vehicle in steady and accelerated motion. J Ship Res 16(4):248–260Google Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence J. Doctors
    • 1
  • Alexander H. Day
    • 2
  • David Clelland
    • 2
  • Philip Beveridge
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Naval Architecture and Marine EngineeringThe University of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations