Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 331–344 | Cite as

Validation of an approach to analyse and understand ship wave making

  • Hoyte C. RavenEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper discusses a rational and systematic procedure for understanding and analysing steady ship wave patterns and their dependence on hull form. A stepwise procedure is proposed in which the pressure distribution around the hull is invoked to provide a qualitative understanding of the connection between hull form and wave making. In a recent publication it was shown how this understanding explains various known trends and, in combination with wave pattern computations by free-surface potential flow or Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) methods, can often be exploited to reduce wave making by modifying the hull form. The present paper provides support for the guidelines given, validates the decomposition into different steps and indicates the connection with previous theoretical approaches.

Keywords

Ship waves Slow-ship linearisation Hull form design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The permission from the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) to reproduce some material from [9] in this paper is acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Dawson CW (1977) A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In: 2nd International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jensen G (1988) Berechnung der stationären Potentialströmung um ein Schiff unter Berücksichtigung der nichtlinearen Randbedingung an der Wasseroberfläche. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hamburg, IfS Bericht 484Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janson C-E (1997) Potential flow panel methods for the calculation of free-surface flows with lift. Thesis, Chalmers Univ. GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raven HC (1992) A practical nonlinear method for calculating ship wavemaking and wave resistance. In: 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raven HC (1996) A solution method for the nonlinear ship wave resistance problem. PhD Thesis, MARIN/Delft University of Technology, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janson C-E, Larsson L (1996) A method for the optimization of ship hull forms from a resistance point of view. In: 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valdenazzi F, Harries S, Janson CE, Leer-Andersen M, Marzi J, Maisonneuve JJ, Raven HC (2003) The FANTASTIC RoRo: CFD optimisation of the forebody and its experimental verification. NAV 2003 Symposium, Palermo, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoekstra M, Raven HC (2003) A practical approach to constrained hydrodynamic optimization of ships. NAV 2003 Symposium, Palermo, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larsson L, Raven HC (2010) Ship resistance and flow. In: Paulling JR (ed) Principles of naval architecture series. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), Jersey City, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raven HC (1988) Variations on a theme by Dawson. In: Proceedings of the 17th Symposium Naval Hydrodynamics, Den Haag, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raven HC (1998) Inviscid calculations of ship wavemaking—capabilities, limitations and prospects. In: 22nd Symposium Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman JN (1977) Marine hydrodynamics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tuck EO, Scullen DC, Lazauskas L (2002) Wave patterns and minimum wave resistance for high-speed vessels. In: 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doctors LJ (1997) Optimal pressure distributions for river-based air-cushion vehicles. Schiffstechnik 44Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wehausen JV, Laitone EV (1960) Surface waves. In: Encyclopedia of Physics, vol IX, Springer, pp 446–778Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raven HC (1997) The nature of nonlinear effects in ship wavemaking. Ship Technol Res 44(1):134Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newman JN (1976) Linearized wave resistance theory. International Seminar on Wave Resistance, Tokyo/Osaka, Society of Naval Architects JapanGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baba E, Takekuma K (1975) A study on free-surface flow around bow of slowly moving full forms. J Soc Naval Archit Jpn 137:65–73Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baba E, Hara M (1977) Numerical evaluation of a wave-resistance theory for slow ships. In: 2nd International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lighthill J (1980) Waves in fluids. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hess JL, Smith AMO (1962) Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional bodies. Douglas Aircraft Company, Report No. 40622Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toda Y, Stern F, Longo J (1991) Mean-flow measurements in the boundary layer and wake and wave field of a Series 60 C b = .6 ship model for Froude numbers .16 and .316. IIHR Report No. 352, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN)WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations