Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 117–126 | Cite as

Maneuvering simulations of pusher-barge systems

  • Koh Kho King
  • Hironori Yasukawa
  • Noritaka Hirata
  • Kuniji Kose
Original Article


Pusher-barge systems were studied in nine different configurations. Captive model tests were performed at the Hiroshima University Towing Tank and the hydrodynamic derivatives for the various configurations were obtained. At a service speed of 7 knots, pusher-barge systems with the same number of barges but arranged in a row (shorter length overall but with a larger breadth) require more power to operate than those that were arranged in a line. When the length overall increased, the tactical diameter, advance, and transfer distances also increased, mainly due to the significant increase in the moment of inertia when barges are arranged in a line, rather than in a row. All pusher-barge systems had small first and second overshoot angles. Pusher-barge systems with the same number of barges had a longer response time to the rudder angle of attack and required a longer stopping distance when arranged in a line, mainly due to the increased moment of inertia and reduced resistance when barges are arranged in this way.

Key words

Pusher-barge Captive model test Maneuvering simulations Hydrodynamic derivatives 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Das PK, Varyani KS, Winkle IE, et al (2003) Assessment of load and strength of fastening systems on seagoing transportation barges. Workshop on Maritime Safety, Efficiency and Low Environmental Impact. 4–5 September 2003, Harbin, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grunthaner GL (1962) Commercial transportation on the inland waterways. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng 70:84–127Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eda, H (1972) Course stability, turning performance, and connection force of barge systems in coastal seaways. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng 80:299–323Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pfennigstorf J (1970) Handbuch der Werften X Band. Bearb von K Wendel. Schiffahrts-Verlag HANSA, C Schroedter, Hamburg, p 11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yasukawa H, Hirata N, Koh KK, et al (2007) Hydrodynamic force characteristics on maneuvering of pusher-barge systems (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Nav Archit Ocean Eng 5: 133–142Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirano M (1980) On the calculation method of ship maneuvering motion at the initial design phase (in Japanese). J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 147:144–153Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fujii H, Tuda T (1961) Experimental research on rudder performance (2) (in Japanese). J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 110:31–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshimura Y, Nomoto K (1978) Modeling of maneuvering behavior of ships with the propeller idling, boosting and reversing (in Japanese). J Soc Nav Archit Jpn 144:57–69Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshimura Y, Sakurai H (1989) Mathematical model for the manoeuvring ship motion in shallow water (3rd report) (in Japanese). J Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn 211:115–126Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luhut TPS, Muis A, Muryadin (2005) Analysis study of train barge maneuvering in shallow water. Report of the10th Seminar and Joint Meeting of the JSPS-DGHE Core University Program on Marine Transportation Engineering. Hiroshima University, Japan, 05-2:283–294Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers (JASNAOE) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koh Kho King
    • 1
  • Hironori Yasukawa
    • 1
  • Noritaka Hirata
    • 1
  • Kuniji Kose
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHigashi HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations