Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 63–72 | Cite as

Overview of proficiency testing provision in pharmaceutical area in Brazil and an educational scheme for determining mefenamic acid in raw materials

  • Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Pereira
  • Mateus Araújo Castro e Souza
  • Gerson Antônio Pianetti
  • Scheilla Vitorino Carvalho de Souza
Practitioner's Report
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

An historical review indicated that the provision of proficiency testing (PT) in the pharmaceutical area in Brazil is critical. Three providers were identified in the period between 2002 and 2015; only one provider was regular, but none was accredited according to the requirements of ISO 17043. A PT was organized without registration fees for educational purposes for the determination of mefenamic acid (2-[(2,3-dimethylphenyl)amino]benzoic acid) in raw materials. Proficiency test items consisted of a mixture of mefenamic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone in the mass ratio 90:10. This proportion was used to simulate an adulterated raw material. Homogeneity and stability testing was performed and indicated that the materials were suitable for use in the PT scheme. First, 68 pharmaceutical laboratories, of which five were ISO 17025 accredited, were contacted to disseminate information about the specific PT and the benefits of this important quality assurance tool. Then, the proficiency test items were sent to the 13 registered participants, of which two were ISO 17025 accredited. In addition, the participating laboratories were surveyed regarding the technical and management aspects of their quality management system (QMS), such as the status of the accreditation process according to the ISO 17025 requirements, staff training, equipment calibration and participation in other PT schemes. All 11 participants that reported results in the study adopted the United States Pharmacopoeia Official Method. Only one laboratory, representing 9.1 % of the participants, had an unsatisfactory z-score result. Factors such as the reduced number of ISO 17025 accredited laboratories, the low number of participants in the educational PT, the high proportion of laboratories that participated for the first time and the portion of the participants who did not know about PT and its importance were considered as determinants for the restricted availability of the PT supply for medicines, as evidenced in the present study in Brazil. Thus, an urgent need for nationwide actions was identified to promote the critical consciousness of managers regarding QMS in pharmaceutical laboratories, including the importance of participation in PT schemes, as well as the importance of encouraging the providers already structured to broaden their scope in this area.

Keywords

Proficiency testing Pharmaceutical analysis Mefenamic acid ISO 17043 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia for the financial support and CNPq for the scholarship grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson M, Lowthian PJ (1993) Effectiveness of analytical quality control is related to the subsequent performance of laboratories in proficiency tests. Analyst 118:1495–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chui QSH, Bispo JMA, Iamashita CO (2004) O papel dos programas interlaboratoriais para a qualidade dos resultados analíticos. Quim Nova 27:993–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ministério da Saúde, Brasil (2004) Portaria Nº2.031, de 23 de setembro de 2004Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Poder Executivo, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ministério da Saúde, Brasil (2005) Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Poder Executivo, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Ministério da Saúde, Brasil (2012) Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Poder Executivo, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    INMETRO (2014) Coordenação Geral de Acreditação (Cgcre). Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.inmetro.gov.br/credenciamento/. Accessed June 2016
  9. 9.
    Belli M, Brookman B, de la Calle B, James V, Koch M, Majcen N, Menditto A, Noblett T, Perissi R, van Putten K, Robouch P, Slapokas T, Taylor P, Tholen D, Tomas A, Tylle B (2009) Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medicine: working discussions on current practice and future directions. Accred Qual Assur 14:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mbwambo K, Koch M (2012) Establishing PT schemes in developing countries: examples from Africa. Accred Qual Assur 17:379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    EPTIS (2016) European proficiency testing information system, Berlin. https://www.eptis.bam.de/en/index.htm. Accessed June 2016
  12. 12.
    INMETRO (2016) Acreditação de Provedores de Ensaios de Proficiência. Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.inmetro.gov.br/credenciamento/acre_prod_ep.asp. Accessed June 2016
  13. 13.
    ANVISA (2016) Provedores em Ensaio de Proficiência Habilitados. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Brasília. http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/provedores-em-ensaio-de-proficiencia-habilitados-na-reblas. Accessed June 2016
  14. 14.
    O’Neil M (2013) The Merck Index an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs and biologicals, 15th edn. Merck, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ministério da Saúde, Brasil (1998) Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Poder Executivo, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    USP 36 (2013) The United States Pharmacopeia, 36th edn. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2006) The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO 13528 (2015) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horwitz W (1982) Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs. Anal Chem 54:67A–76ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson M (2000) Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing. Analyst 125:385–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    IMS (2016) Market audit, pharmaceutical marketing Brazil, Base Jun’ 2016. Intercontinental Marketing Services Health of Brazil, São Paulo. http://www.imshealth.com/pt_BR/country-homepage-content/brazil. Accessed June 2016
  22. 22.
    ABNT NBR 14597 (2000) Analytical methods intralaboratorial program—determination of repeatability and intermediate precision. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO Guide 35 (2012) Reference materials—general and statistical principles for certification. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuvamoto P (2015) Microbiology proficiency testing of Brazilian accredited laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 20:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuselman I, Pennecchi F, Bich W, Hibbert DB (2016) Human being as a part of measuring system influencing measurement results. Accred Qual Assur 21:421–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Pereira
    • 1
  • Mateus Araújo Castro e Souza
    • 1
  • Gerson Antônio Pianetti
    • 1
  • Scheilla Vitorino Carvalho de Souza
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Pharmacy (FAFAR)Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations