Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 97–102 | Cite as

Discussion on classification and performance evaluation of diversified testing procedures

Discussion Forum
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

More and more testing procedures with different principles are being developed covering both quantitative and qualitative analyses. To ensure the reliability of them and relevant testing results, performance evaluation and method validation are necessary. Following the investigation into a variety of testing procedures, this paper is intended to discuss the rational classification of them according to the nature and purpose of testing. Five kinds of testing procedures are summarized according to different combination of input and output properties of the testing model, which are properties on nominal, ordinal, interval and ratio scales. On this basis, the method validation and performance evaluation parameters, statistical approaches and tools available for each group of testing procedures are discussed. The classification of testing procedures seems helpful for inter-comparison of testing procedures with different purposes and application fields, and the development of some general rules for the performance evaluation and validation of them.

Keywords

Testing procedure Method performance Method classification Validation 

References

  1. 1.
    Feldsine P, Abeyta C, Andrews WH (2002) AOAC international methods committee guide for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. J AOAC Int 85(5):1187–1200Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICH harmonised tripartite guideline (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). https://www.ich.org
  3. 3.
    IUPAC Technical Report (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of method of analysis. Pure Appl Chem 74(5):835–855Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EC (2010) Community Reference Laboratories Residues (CRLS) 20/1/2010: guidelines for the validation of screening methods for residues of veterinary medicines (initial validation and transfer). EC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eurachem Guide (2014) The fitness for purpose of analytical methods—a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, 2nd edn.https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/MV_guide_2nd_ed_EN.pdf. Accessed Feb 2015
  6. 6.
    ISO/IEC Guide 99(2007) International vocabulary of metrology-basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dybkær R (2009) An ontology on property for physical, chemical, and biological systems. http://ontology.iupac.org/ontology.pdf
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuentes-Arderiu X (2012) Ordinal quantities in clinical laboratory sciences. Accred Qual Assur 17:349–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IUPAC, IFCC Vocabulary for nominal properties and nominal examinations—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIN) (provisional recommendation). http://www.iupac.org/fileadmin/user_upload/publications/recommendations/pontet_prs.pdf
  11. 11.
    Gadrich T, Bashkansky E (2012) ORDANOVA: analysis of ordinal variation. J Stat Plan Inference 142:3174–3188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO TR 14468 (2010) Selected illustrations of attribute agreement analysis. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO 11843–1 (1997) Capability of detection-Part 1: terms and definitions. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Commission EU (2002) Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Communities L221:8–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of MetrologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations