Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 203–210 | Cite as

Monitoring fuel quality: a case study for quinizarin marker content of unleaded petrol marketed in Greece

  • Ioannis Haloulos
  • Dimitrios Theodorou
  • Ypatia Zannikou
  • Fanourios Zannikos
Practitioner's Report
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Fuel adulteration and cross-contamination lead to low-quality fuel products, which may cause increased environmental pollution, loss of taxes and engine problems. An establishment of a quality monitoring mechanism based on laboratory measurements may reveal problematic areas of the fuel supply chain. For the purposes of this work, 97 unleaded petrol samples were measured in order to quantify mass concentration of quinizarin, a substance used in Greece to easily mark the presence of 95 Research Octane Number unleaded petrol in other types of automotive fuels. The samples were obtained from petroleum retail stations selling different brands of fuels and located in different geographic regions of Greece. Statistical analysis of the results revealed quinizarin mass concentrations below the 3 mg L−1 legislation specification limit and significant differences between brands and geographic regions, which may attributed to the structure of the fuel supply chain in Greece in combination with quinizarin properties and way of handling. Moreover, certain approaches were used for the calculation of decision limits for assessing compliance or non-compliance. These approaches take measurement reproducibility or estimated in-house uncertainty into account, in order to minimize the probability of false rejection.

Keywords

Fuel quality Quality monitoring mechanism Unleaded petrol Quinizarin marker Compliance assessment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Kalligeros S, Zannikos F, Stournas S, Lois E (2003) Fuel adulteration issues in Greece. Energy 28:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trindade MAG, Ferreira VS, Zanoni MVB (2007) A square-wave voltammetric method for analysing the colour marker quinizarine in petrol and diesel fuels. Dyes Pigm 74:566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suwanprasop S, Nhujak T, Roengsumran S, Petsom A (2004) Petroleum marker dyes synthesized from cardanol and aniline derivatives. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:4973–4978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liapis N, Theodorou D, Zannikos F (2013) Absence of TQM across the fuel supply chain: quality failure-associated costs. Total Qual Manag Bus 24:452–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu
  6. 6.
    Directive 2003/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 2003 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu
  7. 7.
    Greek Government Gazette 1039/B/2010 Infringement categories and fine limits—fuel facilities sealing. www.et.gr
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC Guide 98-4:2012 Uncertainty of measurement—part 4: the role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossi GB, Crenna F (2006) A probabilistic approach to measurement based decisions. Measurement 39:101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IP 298:1992 Determination of quinizarin—extraction spectrophotometric method. Energy Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Theodorou D, Zannikos F (2014) The use of measurement uncertainty and precision data in conformity assessment of automotive fuel products. Measurement 50:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM Standard D4057-06 (1995) Standard practice for manual sampling of petroleum and petroleum products. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems—requirements. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    EURACHEM Guide: The Fitness for purpose of analytical methods, 2014. www.eurachem.org
  16. 16.
    O’Donell GE, Hibbert DB (2005) Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty. Analyst 130:721–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO 10576-1:2003 Statistical methods—guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements—part 1: general principles. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carbone P, Macii D, Petri D (2003) Measurement uncertainty and metrological confirmation in quality-oriented organizations. Measurement 34:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    EURACHEM/CITAC Guide: Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment, 2007. www.eurachem.org
  20. 20.
    Weitzel MLJ, Johnson WM (2012) Using target measurement uncertainty to determine fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur 17:491–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Desimoni E, Brunetti B (2011) Uncertainty of measurement and conformity assessment: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 400:1729–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams A (2008) Principles of the EURACHEM/CITAC guide ‘‘Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment’’. Accred Qual Assur 13:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO 4259:2006 Petroleum products—determination and application of precision data in relation to methods of test. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramsey MH, Thompson M, Hale M (1992) Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance. J Geochem Explor 44:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Theodorou D, Liapis N, Zannikos F (2013) Estimation of measurement uncertainty arising from manual sampling of fuels. Talanta 105:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silva RJNB, Santos JR, Camões MFGFC (2006) A new terminology for the approaches to the quantification of the measurement uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 10:664–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis Haloulos
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Theodorou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ypatia Zannikou
    • 1
  • Fanourios Zannikos
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Fuels and Lubricants Technology, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Halandri, AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations