Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 229–231 | Cite as

A personal view on metrology in chemical analysis

Discussion Forum

Abstract

This short communication presents the author’s pragmatic view on the most important activities in applying the metrological principles to chemical analysis.

Keywords

Metrology in chemistry Selectivity Reference values Random and systematic effects Constant improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    JCGM 200:2008 (2008) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edn. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  2. 2.
    Extensive set of guidance materials on MiC is available from Eurachem at http://www.eurachem.org/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  3. 3.
    Extensive set of guidance materials on MiC is available from Nordtest at http://www.nordtest.info/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  4. 4.
    Wenclawiak BW, Koch M, Hadjicostas E (2004) Quality assurance in analytical chemistry. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majcen N, Taylor P (eds) (2007) Practical examples on traceability, measurement uncertainty and validation in chemistry, vol 1. EC-JRC IRMM, GeelGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Majcen N, Gegevicius V (eds) (2012) Analytical measurement: measurement uncertainty and statistics. EC-JRC IRMM, GeelGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    TrainMiC—Training in Metrology in Chemistry. EC-JRC IRMM. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/trainmic. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  8. 8.
    Estimation of measurement uncertainty in chemical analysis, online course. University of Tartu, 2013. https://sisu.ut.ee/measurement/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  9. 9.
    EACH—Excellence in Analytical Chemistry. http://www.analyticalchemistry.eu/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  10. 10.
    EMQAL—Erasmus Mundus Master in Quality in Analytical Laboratories. http://www.emqal.org/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  11. 11.
    Measurement Science in Chemistry Euromaster®. http://www.msc-euromaster.eu/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  12. 12.
    Fiamegos Y, Cordeiro F, Robouch P, Emteborg H, Charoud-Gota J, Omberg LG, Rodushkin I, de la Calle B (2014) Food Addit Contam Part A 31:63–72Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Näykki T, Jalukse L, Helm I, Leito I (2013) Water 5:420–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Interlaboratory comparisons organised at UT Testing Centre. http://www.ut.ee/katsekoda/ILC/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  15. 15.
    Kruve A, Leito I (2013) Anal Methods 5:3035–3044Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emons H (2014) Traceability in chemical analysis—are we ready to deliver? Presented at the Eurachem Workshop on quality in analytical measurements, Lisbon, 19–21 May 2014Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sooväli L, Rõõm E-I, Kütt A, Kaljurand I, Leito I (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:246–255Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO, Geneva Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M (2012) Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. Nordtest technical report 537, 3rd edn. Nordtest. http://www.nordtest.info/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015
  20. 20.
    Leito I (2014) Recovery/bias evaluation. Presented at the Eurachem Workshop on quality in analytical measurements, Lisbon, 19–21 May 2014. http://www.ut.ee/EACH/?p=1936. Accessed 30 Apr 2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ChemistryUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations