Advertisement

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 107–114 | Cite as

Implementation of the calibration’s VIM3 definition using the matrix of variance–covariance of input data

  • Marc PrielEmail author
  • Michèle Désenfant
General Paper
  • 215 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses the effects following the implementation of the concept of calibration presented in the 3rd edition of the international vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) and the repercussions of practitioners adopting VIM3. The new definition leads to modifications in the treatment of calibration data. It is now necessary to establish a relation which allows obtaining any measurement result from any indication of the measuring instrument. This relation takes into account uncertainties and any covariances, both on the values of the standards used and on the indications and maybe even the covariances. The usual statistical technique of regression, the ordinary least squares adjustment, does not generally enable to reach this goal. As a result, more sophisticated methods need to be used, for instance the Generalised Gauss Markov Regression. We compared both methods on a gas chromatograph calibration example.

Keywords

Calibration Metrological terminology VIM Ordinary least squares (OLS) Generalised Gauss Markov Regression (GGMR) Measurement uncertainty Variance–covariance matrix 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is based on the discussions in the working group of the College Français de Métrologie, and the authors thank all the participants for the fruitful discussions [8]. Many thanks to Béatrice Lalère and Adrien Caurant for providing data related to the example of gas chromatograph calibration. The treatment of data presented in the example is based on software developed by a statistical project team leaded by Catherine Yardin from LNE.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO (1993) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), GenovaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2012) International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), JCGM 200:2012, (www.bipm.org)
  3. 3.
    ISO (2006) ISO 6143 gas analysis—comparison methods for determining and checking the composition of calibration gas mixtures. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), GenovaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO (2010) ISO/TS 28037 determination and use of straight-line calibration functions. International Organisation for Standardization (ISO), GenovaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bich W (2008) Interdependence between measurement uncertainty and traceability, Imeko workshop traceability to support CIPM MRA and other international arrangements. Accred Qual Assur 14:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with minor correctionsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox MG, Forbes AB, Harris PM, Smith I (2004) The classification and solution of regression problems for calibration, NPL Report CMSC 24/03. National Physical Laboratory, TeddingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collège Français de Métrologie (2014) Application du nouveau concept d’étalonnage du VIM3, 2014. LEXITIS Edition, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lira I (2002) Evaluating the measurement uncertainty: fundamentals and practical guidance. Institute of Physics, pp 144–148Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caurant A, Lalère B, Schbath M-C, Stumpf C, Sutour C, Mace T, Quisefit J-P, Doussin J-F, Vaslin-Reimann S (2010) A new certified reference material for benzene measurement in air on a sorbent tube: development and proficiency testing. Anal Bioanal Chem 398(5):2265–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Software developed by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK, 2010 (www.npl.co.uk/mathematics-and-modelling-for-metrology) Software from Collège Français de Métrologie M-CARE Modélisation des résultats d’étalonnage, 2013 (www.cfmetrologie.com)
  12. 12.
    Milton MJT, Harris PM, Smith IM, Brown AS, Goody BA (2006) Implementation of a generalised least squares methods for determining calibration curves from data with general uncertainty structures. Metrologia 43:S291–S298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essaisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations