Quality management of preanalytical phase: impact of lithium heparin vacuum tubes changes on clinical chemistry tests
- 368 Downloads
The validation process is essential in accredited laboratory medicine, but is rarely regarded as an issue in the preanalytical management. The aim of this study was to validate five kinds of lithium heparin vacuum tubes for routine clinical chemistry laboratory testing. Blood specimens from 100 volunteers in five different plasma vacuum tubes (Tube I: VACUETTE®, Tube II: LABOR IMPORT®, Tube III: S-Monovette®, Tube IV: PST® and Tube V: PST II®) were collected by a single expert phlebotomist. The routine clinical chemistry tests were performed on a Cobas® 6000 <c501> module. The significance of the differences between samples was statistically assessed at p < 0.005. The biases from the different tubes were compared with the current desirable quality specifications. Basically, significant differences could be confirmed by RM ANOVA for the results of the clinical chemistry tests on the following components: glucose, urea, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, phosphate, Ca, Mg, Fe and K. Clinically significant variations as compared with the current desirable quality specifications were found for glucose, creatinine, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, Ca, Mg and K. In conclusion, our results do not support arbitrary interchange among brands of plasma vacuum tubes. Future investigations are needed to understand the reasons of these observations; in the meantime, we suggest that laboratory managers standardize the procedures and frequently evaluate the quality of in vitro diagnostic devices.
KeywordsLaboratory variability Blood collection devices Plasma samples Patient safety Validation process Interference
Conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
- 3.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2007) Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture. CLSI H3-A6 document, 6th edn. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PAGoogle Scholar
- 4.Guder WG, Narayanan S, Wisser H, Zawta B (2009) Diagnostic samples: from the patient to the laboratory: the impact of preanalytical variables on the quality of laboratory results, 4th edn, Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Scartezini M, Guidi GC et al (2011) Transillumination: a new tool to eliminate the impact of venous stasis during the procedure for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens for routine haematological testing. Int J Lab Hematol 33:457–462Google Scholar
- 7.Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Mangueira C, Sumita N et al (2011) New ways to deal with known preanalytical issues: use of transilluminator instead of tourniquet for easing vein access and eliminating stasis on clinical biochemistry. Biochem Med 21:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2010) Procedures for the handling and processing of blood specimens for common laboratory tests. CLSI H18-A4 document, 4th edn. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, WayneGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hyltoft Petersen P, Fraser CG (2010) Strategies to set global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine: 10 years on from Stockholm consensus conference. Accred Qual Assur 15:323–330Google Scholar
- 11.Westgard J (2012) Biological variation database specifications. Available at: http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Accessed 10th Feb 2013
- 14.Plebani M, Lippi G (2012) Biological variation and reference change values: an essential piece of the puzzle of laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 50:189–190Google Scholar
- 20.Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Poli G, Solero GP et al (2013) The brand of K2EDTA vacuum tubes as a new source of preanalytical variability in routine hematology testing. Br J Biomed Sci 70:6–9Google Scholar
- 21.Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Poli G, Solero GP et al (2012) K3EDTA vacuum tubes validation for routine hematological testing. ISRN Hematol 2012:875357Google Scholar