Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 161–165 | Cite as

Some reflections on the proposed redefinition of the unit for the amount of substance and of other SI units

  • Franco PaveseEmail author
Discussion Forum


Proposals on the floor at CIPM are aiming at defining basic units by stipulating a consensus value for a number of fundamental constants. The paper indicates the author’s viewpoint about a number of issues that, in his view, should be better understood before such a choice becomes indisputable. They include the count nature of the Avogadro number; the correct expression of its stipulated numerical value; the check for the consistency of the SI system; the shift to the unit of the experimental uncertainty; the loss of the concept of base unit; the possibility of checking the correctness of the future standards; implications for the future reductions in uncertainty; the meaning of ‘fundamental’ related to the constants; and some lexical problems.


Basic units Definition of units Fundamental constants SI 


  1. 1.
    Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) (2006) Le Système International d’Unités (SI), 8th edn. BIPM, SèvresGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IUPAC Commission I-1 (ER Cohen, T Cvitas, JG Frey, B Holmström, K Kuchitsu, R Marquardt, I Mills, F Pavese, M Quack, J Stohner, HL Strauss, M Takami, AJ Thor) (2007) Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry (III ed) Green book, RSC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    BIPM (2008) International Vocabulary of MetrologyBasic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM) 3rd edn BIPM/ISO. Free downloading from
  4. 4.
    Duff MJ, Okun LB, Veneziano G (2002) J. High Energy Phys. JHEP03(2002)023. Free download from
  5. 5.
    Mills IM (2010) Chemistry International January-February 10–11Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Bièvre P (2007) Accred Qual Assur 12:221–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Bièvre P (2006) Accred Qual Assur 11:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price G, De Bièvre P (2009) Accred Qual Assur 14:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mills IM, Mohr PJ, Quinn TJ, Taylor BN, Williams ER (2005) Metrologia 42:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Comité International des Poids et Measures (CIPM) (2005) Recommendation 1 (CI 2005). Downloading from
  11. 11.
    Mills IM, Mohr PJ, Quinn TJ, Taylor BN, Williams ER (2006) Metrologia 43:226–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohr PJ (2008) Metrologia 45:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Becker P, De Bièvre P, Fujii K, Glaeser M, Inghlis B, Luebbig H, Mana G (2007) Metrologia 44:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), 2nd edn. International Standards Organisation, Geneva. Free downloading from
  15. 15.
    Levy-LeBlond J-M (1979) The importance of being (a) constant, in problems in the foundations of physics. Enrico Fermi School LXXII, G. Torraldi ed, (North Holland), p 237Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations