Toward standardization of quality assessment in laboratory medicine by using the same matrix samples for both internal and external quality assessments
- 112 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
The main purpose of quality assurance procedures in clinical laboratories is to ensure that test results are appropriate to maintain excellence in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of disease. However, in current practice, no standardized procedure or frequency for the evaluation of methods exists, particularly in external quality assessment. Furthermore, different quality control materials are typically used for internal and external quality assessment. To overcome these discrepancies, we used samples with the same matrix for both internal and external quality assessments of a group test performed in our laboratory. We then calculated total error using real bias (target value obtained by reference method) and the imprecision of each test and compared our results with the total error allowable, derived from biological variation data. We suggest that the strategy of using the same matrix samples for both internal and external quality assessment is cost-effective, can be readily used by staff, and will facilitate the standardization of quality control in clinical laboratories.
Keywords
External quality Biological variation Quality control Bias Total allowable error Laboratory standardizationReferences
- 1.Coskun A, Unsal I, Serteser M, Fraterman A (2009) Towards standardization of external quality assessment schemes by using bias values based on biological variation. Accred Qual Assur 14:547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Fraser CG (2001) Biological variation: from principles to practice. AACC Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 3.ISO 13528:2005(E), Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisonsGoogle Scholar
- 4.Thomas A (2009) External quality assessment in laboratory medicine: is there a rationale to determine frequency of surveys? Accred Qual Assur 14:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Örnemark U, Fostel H, Straub R, van de Kreeke J (2004) Policies, requirements and surveys concerning frequency for participation in proficiency testing schemes. Accred Qual Assur 9:729–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Belli M (2009) PT/EQA standards and guidelines: some remarks on quality and reliability of test items. Accred Qual Assur 14:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.ILAC-P9:2005. ILAC Policy for Participation in National and International Proficiency Testing ActivitiesGoogle Scholar
- 8.Whetton M, Finch H (2009) Analytical performance is improved by regular participation in proficiency testing: an analysis of data from the Aquacheck proficiency testing scheme. Accred Qual Assur 14:445–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Arnaud J, Jones RL, LeBlanc A, Lee MY, Mazarrasa O, Parsons P et al (2009) Criteria to define the standard deviation for proficiency assessment for the determination of essential trace elements in serum: comparison of Z-scores based on the Horwitz function or on biological variability. Accred Qual Assur 14:427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar