Accreditation and Quality Assurance

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 83–89

A practical procedure for assigning a reference value and uncertainty in the frame of an interlaboratory comparison

General Paper

Abstract

A method is suggested for the calculation of a reference value and its uncertainty to be used in the frame of an interlaboratory comparison (ILC). It is assumed that the reference value of the measurand is determined independently from the ILC round. It is derived from a limited set of measurement results obtained from one or several expert laboratories. The procedure involves three stages: (1) check of the experimental data and possible corrections; (2) check of the consistency of data, and possibly increase of the uncertainties in order to attain internal consistency; (3) choice between fully, partially or un-weighted mean.

Keywords

Interlaboratory comparison Reference value Mean Uncertainty 

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/IEC (1997) ISO guide 43-1, Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Part I: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO (2005) International standard ISO 13528. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson M, Ellison S, Wood R (2006) Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kacker R, Datla R, Parr A (2002) Metrologia 39:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pommé S (2006) Appl Radiat Isot 64:1158–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pommé S (2006) Applied modeling and computations in nuclear science. Semkow TM, Pommé S, Jerome SM, Strom DJ (eds) ACS symposium series 945, American Chemical Society, pp 282–292, ISBN 0-8412-3982-7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox MG (2007) Metrologia 44:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lira I (2007) Metrologia 44:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox MG, Forbes AB, Flowers JL, Harris PM (2004) Advanced mathematical and computational tools in metrology VI. Ciarlini P, Cox MG, Pavese F, Rossi GB (eds) Series on advances in mathematics for applied sciences, vol 66, World Scientific, pp 37–51Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cox MG (2002) Metrologia 39:589–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pennecchi F, Callegaro L (2006) Metrologia 43:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willink R (2007) Metrologia 44:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pauwels J, Lamberty A, Schimmel H (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levenson MS, Banks DL, Eberhardt KR, Gill LM, Guthrie WF, Liu HK, Vangel MG, Yen JH, Zhang NF (2000) J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 105:571–579Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Commission, Joint Research CentreInstitute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM)GeelBelgium

Personalised recommendations