Advertisement

Requirements Engineering

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 523–543 | Cite as

Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis

  • Ahmed D. AlharthiEmail author
  • Maria Spichkova
  • Margaret Hamilton
Original Article

Abstract

eLearning systems have become a very important part of teaching, both as web-based systems for online education and as auxiliary tools for face-to-face study, where they provide an additional learning support for on-campus learners. To insure the sustainability of an eLearning system on both individual and social levels, we have to cover many aspects of sustainability requirements: human, technical, economic, and environmental. This paper provides a systematic literature review of the sustainability meta-requirements for eLearning systems to identify open problems and to present the state of the art of this research area. We analysed 124 papers, so we identified 18 high-level sustainability requirements for eLearning systems.

Keywords

Sustainability requirements Requirements engineering eLearning Sustainable eLearning systems Sustainability Systematic literature review 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ahmed D. Alharthi is supported by a scholarship from Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen DB, Gould RA, Littrell LA, Schillie JE (2010) K-state’s distributed learning commons: achieving long-term sustainability through strategic partnerships. Coll. Undergrad. Libr. 17(2):160–176Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alrashidi A (2013) An exploration of e-learning benefits for Saudi Arabia: Toward policy reform. PhD thesis, University of La VerneGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amador F, Oliveira CP (2013) Integrating sustainability into the university: past, present, and future. In: Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: mapping trends and good practices around the world, Springer, pp 65–78Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson T, Dron J (2012) Learning technology through three generations of technology enhanced distance education pedagogy. Eur J Open Distance e-learn 15(2):1–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assembly UG (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Technical report, A/RES/70/1, 21 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attwell G (2007) Personal learning environments-the future of e-learning? eLearning Pap 2(1):1–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell M, Bell W (2005) It’s installed... now get on with it! looking beyond the software to the cultural change. Br J Educ Technol 36(4):643–656Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bensch S, Rager M (2012) Cloud-based online learning platforms. In: Business information systems workshops, vol 127 LNBIP, pp 165–176Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berge ZL, Giles L (2006) Implementing and sustaining e-learning in the workplace. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ (IJICTE) 2(4):64–75Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berge ZL, Giles L (2008) Strategic planning for e-learning in the workplace. In: Adapting information and communication technologies for effective education. IGI Global, pp 257–270Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berkhout F, Hertin J (2001) Impacts of information and communication technologies on environmental sustainability: speculations and evidence. Report to the OECD, Brighton, p 21Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Betz S, Caporale T (2014) Sustainable software system engineering. In: The fourth international conference on big data and cloud computing (BdCloud). IEEE, pp 612–619Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhat JS (2011) Technological ambidexterity in the management of national infrastructure programmes. J Asian Public Policy 4(3):350–356Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bottino RM (2007) On-line learning networks: framework and scenarios. Educ Inf Technol 12(2):93–105Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bourn D, Shiel C (2009) Global perspectives: aligning agendas? Environ Educ Res 15(6):661–677Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80(4):571–583Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breslow L, Pritchard DE, DeBoer J, Stump GS, Ho AD, Seaton DT (2013) Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edx’s first mooc. Res Pract Asses 8:13–25Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buchan J (2010) Putting ourselves in the big picture: a sustainable approach to project management for e-learning. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ 24(1):55–76Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burton SL, Harris HR, Burrell DN, Brown-Jackson KL, Bessette D, McClintock R, Lu S, White YW (2014) Educational edifices need a mobile strategy to fully engage in learning activities. In: Implications of social media use in personal and professional settings, pp 284–309Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Calero C, Piattini M (2015) Green in software engineering. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calero C, Piattini M (2017) Puzzling out software sustainability. Sustain Comput Inf Syst 16:117–124Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calero C, Bertoa MF, Moraga MÁ (2013) Sustainability and quality: icing on the cake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems, CEUR-WS.orgGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cápay M, Mesárošová M, Balogh Z (2011) Analysis of students’ behaviour in e-learning system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd EAEEIE annual conference (EAEEIE), 2011. IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Casquero O, Portillo J, Ovelar R, Benito M, Romo J (2010) iPLE network: an integrated eLearning 2.0 architecture from a university’s perspective. Interact Learn Environ 18(3):293–308Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castro-Schez JJ, Redondo MA, Gallardo J, Jurado F et al (2012) Designing and developing software for educative virtual laboratories with language processing techniques: lessons learned in practical experiments. J Res Pract Inf Technol 44(3):289–308Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang V, Guetl C (2007) E-learning ecosystem (eles)-a holistic approach for the development of more effective learning environment for small-and-medium sized enterprises (SMES). In: Digital EcoSystems and technologies conference, 2007. DEST’07. Inaugural IEEE-IES. IEEE, pp 420–425Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen CM, Lee HM, Chen YH (2005) Personalized e-learning system using item response theory. Comput Educ 44(3):237–255Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen IY (2007) The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communitiesa longitudinal study. J Inf Sci 33(4):451–467Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheung CM, Lee MK (2009) Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: model development and empirical test. J Inf Sci 35(3):279–298Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chiu CM, Hsu MH, Wang ET (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Supp Syst 42(3):1872–1888Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Colasante M (2010) Future-focused learning via online anchored discussion, connecting learners with digital artefacts, other learners, and teachers. In: Ascilite 2010. Ascilite, pp 211–221Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Colomo-Palacios R, Messnarz R, Siakas K, Palosi D, Coakley D (2014) Using social media as a tool for business improvement and certification of knowledge workers. J Softw Evol Process 26(9):791–798Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dagger D, Conlan O, Wade V (2005) Fundamental requirements of personalised elearning development environments. In: Richards G (ed) E-Learn: world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2005, association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE), pp 2746–2754Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dagger D, O’Connor A, Lawless S, Walsh E, Wade V (2007) Service-oriented e-learning platforms: from monolithic systems to flexible services. Internet Comput 11(3):28–35Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Demirkan H, Goul M, Gros M (2010) A reference model for sustainable e-learning service systems: experiences with the joint university/teradata consortium. Decis Sci J Innov Educ 8(1):151–189Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Demski J (2012) Rebuilding the lms for the 21st century. Campus Technol 25(8):34Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dholakia U, King J, Baraniuk R (2006) What makes an open education program sustainable? the case of connexions. In: Open education conference, vol 2340Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dinevski D (2008) Open educational resources and lifelong learning. In: 30th international conference on information technology interfaces ITI 2008, 2008. IEEE, pp 117–122Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dong B, Zheng Q, Yang J, Li H, Qiao M (2009) An e-learning ecosystem based on cloud computing infrastructure. In: International conference on advanced learning technologies. IEEE, pp 125–127Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Downes S (2007) Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdiscip J E-Learn Learn Objects 3(1):29–44Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dyson LE, Litchfield A, Lawrence E, Raban R, Leijdekkers P (2009) Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: four case studies. Aust J Educ Technol 25(2):250–267Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ellis RA (2016) Students approaches to groupwork in a blended course, associations with perceptions of the online environment and academic achievement-when is learning engaged? Educ Inf Technol 21(5):1095–1112Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Farooq U, Schank P, Harris A, Fusco J, Schlager M (2007) Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: a case study of designing tapped in. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 16(4–5):397–429Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fisler J, Bleisch S (2006) elml, the elesson markup language: developing ustainable e-learning content using an open source xml framework. In: In WEBIST 2006-international conference on web information systems and technologies, 11th–13th April 2006 (Setubal, Citeseer)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fisler J, Schneider F (2009) Creating, handling and implementing e-learning courses using the open source tools olat and elml at the university of zurich. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, vol 1Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Franceschi KG, Lee RM, Hinds D (2008) Engaging e-learning in virtual worlds: supporting group collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, pp 7–7Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Friesen N (2009) Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 10(5):1–13Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Garg K, Varma V (2015) Systemic requirements of a software engineering learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th India software engineering conference, ISEC ’15. ACM, pp 147–155Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Garrison DR, Akyol Z (2009) Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. J Comput Higher Educ 21(1):19Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Georgiadou E, Siakas KV (2006) Distance learning: technologies; enabling learning at own place, own pace, own time. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on software process improvement-research into education and training,(INSPIRE 2006) learning and teaching issues in software quality, April, Southampton, UK, pp 29–40Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ghirardini B (2011) E-learning methodologies A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Goodland R (2002) The concept of environmental sustainability. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26(1):1–24Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gunn C (2010) Sustainability factors for e-learning initiatives. ALT-J 18(2):89–103Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gunn C (2011) Sustaining e-learning innovations, changing demands, changing directions. Proc Ascilite Hobart 2011:509–519Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gunn C, Woodgate S, OGrady W (2005) Repurposing learning objects: a sustainable alternative? ALT-J 13(3):189–200Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gustavsson I, Nilsson K, Zackrisson J, Garcia-Zubia J, Hernandez-Jayo U, Nafalski A, Nedic Z, Gol O, Machotka J, Pettersson M, Lago T, Hkansson L (2009) On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2(4):263–274Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Halimi S (2005) Lifelong learning for equity and social cohesion: a new challenge for higher education. Lifelong Learn Distance Higher Educ Commonw Learn /UNESCO 2005:11–22Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Halkias D, Mills GT (2008) Distance education in support of lifelong learning: the case of the hellas alive web platform in building greek language learning communities. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computers. ACM, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hine N, Petersen F, Pluke M, Sund T (2008) Standardization work on personalized ehealth systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 1518–1520Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hoffman JJ, Hoelscher ML, Sherif K (2005) Social capital, knowledge management, and sustained superior performance. J Knowl Manag 9(3):93–100Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hylén J (2006) Open educational resources: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of open educationGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Iatagan M (2012) Strategies for ongoing professional training of human resources in a globalized economy. Human Capital and Resources: Developments, Management and StrategiesGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    ISO/IEC 25010 (2011) Systems and software engineering software product quality requirements and evaluation (square) software product quality and system quality in use modelsGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    James P (2014) Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circles of sustainability. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jiang H, Ganoe C, Carroll JM (2010) Four requirements for digital case study libraries. Educ Inf Technol 15(3):219–236Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jin G, Law R (2009) Lifelong learning to advance the engineer’s career. Ann Conf Can Soc Civil Eng 1:50–59Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kazancoglu Y, Aksoy M (2011) A fuzzy logic-based qfd to identify key factors of e-learning design. Proc Soc Beha Sci 28:322–327Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Keele S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of DurhamGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Keengwe J, Malapile S (2014) Factors influencing technology planning in developing countries: a literature review. Educ Inf Technol 19(4):703–712Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kendall M (2005) Lifelong learning really matters for elementary education in the 21st century. Educ Inf Technol 10(3):289–296Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kim P, Miranda T, Olaciregui C (2008) Pocket school: exploring mobile technology as a sustainable literacy education option for underserved indigenous children in latin america. Int J Educ Dev 28(4):435–445Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kitchenham B, Dyba T, Jorgensen M (2004) Evidence-based software engineering. In: 26th International conference on software engineering. ACM, pp 273–281Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ko HM (2012) Soft power: a critical factor for the effectiveness and development of a school. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 7513 LNCS:414–420Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Koçak SA, Alptekin GI, Bener AB (2015) Integrating environmental sustainability in software product quality. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems (RE4SuSy), CEUR-WS.org, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Konting MM (2012) Leadership development for sustainability of e-learning. Proc Soc Beh Sci 67:312–321Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Koohang A, Harman K (2007) Advancing sustainability of open educational resources. Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol 4:535–544Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Koshkin AP, Rassolov IM, Novikov AV (2016) Monitoring social media: students satisfaction with university administration activities. Educ Inf Technol 22:2499–2522Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kruchten P (2015) Lifelong learning for lifelong employment. IEEE Softw 32(4):85–87Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kumar S, Buyya R (2012) Green cloud computing and environmental sustainability. Harnessing green it: principles and practices, pp 315–339Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lago P, Jansen T (2011) Creating environmental awareness in service oriented software engineering. In: Service-oriented computing. Springer, pp 181–186Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lago P, Koçak SA, Crnkovic I, Penzenstadler B (2015) Framing sustainability as a property of software quality. Commun ACM 58(10):70–78Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    van Lamsweerde A (2008) Requirements engineering: From craft to discipline. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering. ACM, pp 238–249Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Laurillard D (2007) Modelling benefits-oriented costs for technology enhanced learning. Higher Educ 54(1):21–39Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lee MJ, Chan A (2007) Pervasive, lifestyle-integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. Open Learn 22(3):201–218Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Littlejohn A (2003a) Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Littlejohn A (2003b) Supporting sustainable e-learning. Assoc Learn Technol J 11(3):88–102Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Liu CC, Chung CW, Tao SY (2009) Making classrooms socio-technical environments for supporting collaborative learning: the role of personal devices and boundary objects. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning, international society of the learning sciences, CSCL’09, pp 320–324Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lizhong T, Aichen Z, Yongjie S (2011) The function of the university libraries in constructing lifelong education system. Adv Intell Soft Comput 109:341–346Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mahmood T, Hafeez K (2013) Performance assessment of an e-learning software system for sustainability. Int J Qual Serv Sci 5(2):208–229Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mahmoud SS, Ahmad I (2013) A green model for sustainable software engineering. Int J Softw Eng Appl 7(4):1738–9984Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Manca S, Ranieri M (2017) Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Educ Inf Technol 22(2):605–622Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Manuja M, et al (2011) Industry academia collaboration model: the design challenges. In: 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on software engineering education and training (CSEE&T). IEEE, pp 111–120Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Mason M (2008) What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educ Philos Theory 40(1):35–49Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Memmel M (2011) Interoperability requirements for a sustainable component to support management and sharing of digital resources. In: 1st Workshop on exploring fitness and evolvability of personal learning environments, CEUR-WS.org, pp 25–29Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Meneses G (2011) Design of an electronic instrumentation virtual laboratory based on free-open resources. In: 2011 6th Colombian computing congress (CCC). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Miliszewska I, Sztendur E (2011) Critical success attributes of transnational it education programmes: the client perspective. J Inf Technol Educ Res 10(1):123–137Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Mocigemba D (2006) Sustainable computing. Poiesis Praxis 4(3):163–184Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mohan L, Raman P, Choppella V, Reddy YR (2017) A crowdsourcing approach for quality enhancement of elearning systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th innovations in software engineering conference, ISEC ’17, ACM, pp 188–194Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Motiwalla LF (2007) Mobile learning: a framework and evaluation. Comput Educ 49(3):581–596Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Mridha GMN, Erlandsson B, Khan A, Islam M, Sultana N, Reza S, Srinivas M (2013) E-learning for empowering the rural people in bangladesh opportunities and challenges. In: International conference on e-learning and e-technologies in education (ICEEE). IEEE, pp 323–328Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Müller J, Gil JMS, Hernández F, Giró X, Bosco A (2007) The socio-economic dimensions of ict-driven educational change. Comput Educ 49(4):1175–1188Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Müller M, Siebenhüner B (2007) Policy instruments for sustainability-oriented organizational learning. Bus Strategy Environ 16(3):232–245Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Naumann S, Dick M, Kern E, Johann T (2011) The GREENSOFT model: a reference model for green and sustainable software and its engineering. Sustain Comput Inform Syst 1(4):294–304Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Neila R, Rabai LBA (2014) Deploying suitable countermeasures to solve the security problems within an e-learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on security of information and networks, SIN ’14, ACM, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Nichols M (2008) Institutional perspectives: the challenges of e-learning diffusion. Br J Educ Technol 39(4):598–609Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Nunes EP, Luz AR, Lemos EM, Maciel C, dos Anjos AM, Borges LC, Nunes C (2016) Mobile serious game proposal for environmental awareness of children. In: The frontiers in education conference (FIE), IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Nwokediuko A (2012) Advancing e-learning in african native communities: the language factor. In: International conference on education and e-learning innovations (ICEELI). IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Olofsson AD, Lindberg JO (2006) ”Whatever happened to the social dimension?” aspects of learning in a distance-based teacher training programme. Educ Inf Technol 11(1):7–20Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    O’Neil AF (2008) The current status of instructional design theories in relation to today’s authoring systems. Br J Educ Technol 39(2):251–267MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ossiannilsson E, Landgren L (2012) Quality in e-learning-a conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. J Comput Assist Learn 28(1):42–51Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Pardo A, Fisteus JA, Kloos CD et al (2012) A distributed collaborative system for flexible learning content production and management. J Res Pract Inf Technol 44(2):203–221Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Park CB, Choi H, Kim P (2009) Adaptive open mobile learning device for the underserved. In: ICCE’09 international conference on consumer electronics, digest of technical papers, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Pellas N (2014) The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Comput Hum Behav 35:157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Pellas N (2016) Bolstering the quality and integrity of online collaborative university- level courses via an open sim standalone server in conjunction with sloodle. Educ Inf Technol 21(5):1007–1032Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Penzenstadler B (2014) Infusing green: Requirements engineering for green in and through software systems. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems, (RE4SuSy), CEUR-WS.orgGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Penzenstadler B, Femmer H (2013) A generic model for sustainability with process- and product-specific instances. In: Proceedings of the workshop on green in/by software engineering. ACM, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Pettersson O, Vogel B (2012) Reusability and interoperability in mobile learning: a study of current practices. In: The seventh international conference on wireless. Mobile and ubiquitous technology in education. IEEE, pp 306–310Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Pullen JM, Snow C (2007) Integrating synchronous and asynchronous internet distributed education for maximum effectiveness. Educ Inf Technol 12(3):137–148Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rahanu H, Georgiadou E, Siakas K, Ekert D, Messanarz R, Abeysinghe G (2015) Towards relating delivery methods and examination success: lessons learned from the valo llp project case study. J Softw Evol Process 27(8):555–564Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Rajasingham L (2011) Will mobile learning bring a paradigm shift in higher education? Educ Res Int 2011:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/5284951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Randelin M, Saaranen T, Naumanen P, Louhevaara V (2013) Towards sustainable well-being in smes through the web-based learning program of ergonomics. Educ Inf Technol 18(1):95–111Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Razavian M, Procaccianti G, Tamburri DA, et al (2014) Four-dimensional sustainable e-services. In: Proceedings of the 28th EnviroInfo, Shaker-Verlag AGGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Richey RC (2008) Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. TechTrends 52(1):24–25Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Robertson I (2008) Sustainable e-learning, activity theory and professional development. In: Ascilite, ASCILITE (Melbourne, Australia), pp 819–826Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Roher K, Richardson D (2013) Sustainability requirement patterns. In: The third international workshop on requirements patterns (RePa). IEEE, pp 8–11Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Rovai AP, Downey JR (2010) Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. Internet Higher Educ 13(3):141–147Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Roy A (2012) eLearning: tool to ensure growth and sustainability of SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on e-learning. ECEL, p 480Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 9(2):116–130Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Ruyters M, Colasante M, Douglas K, Mandarano G (2012) Sustainability of a university designed and developed media annotation tool to prepare learners with skills needed for future employment. ASCILITE–annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary EducationGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Salmon G (2005) Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J 13(3):201–218Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Schoenwald I (2003) Sustainable implementation of e-learning as a change process at universities. Online Educ 1:1–6Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Scoppio G, Luyt I (2017) Mind the gap: enabling online faculty and instructional designers in mapping new models for quality online courses. Educ Inf Technol 22:725–746Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Secundo G, Passiante G, Romano A (2012) Industry-university learning network to create competences for intelligent and sustainable manufacturing: a case study. In: International conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Secundo G, Passiante G, Romano A, Moliterni P (2013) Developing the next generation of engineers for intelligent and sustainable manufacturing: a case study. Int J Eng Educ 29(1):248–262Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Sharpe R, Benfield G, Francis R (2006) Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools. Res Learn Technol 14(2):135–151Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Shehabat IM, Mahdi SA (2009) E-learning and its impact to the educational system in the arab world. In: International conference on information management and engineering. IEEE, pp 220–225Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Shen L, LeClair J (2013) Use of sustainable and systematic plan to assess student learning outcomes for non-traditional it students. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, American Society for Engineering EducationGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Sousa JL (2011) Information systems architecture modeling based on loosely coupled structures: an e-learning use case. In: 9th International conference on emerging elearning technologies and applications (ICETA). IEEE, pp 195–198Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Sowe SK, Zettsu K, Murakami Y (2013) A model for creating and sustaining information services platform communities: lessons learnt from open source software. In: Proceedings of ITU kaleidoscope: building sustainable communities (K-2013). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Sridharan B, Deng H, Corbitt B (2010) Critical success factors in elearning ecosystems: a qualitative study. J Syst Inf Technol 12(4):263–288Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Stechert P (2006) Informatics system comprehension: a learner-centred cognitive approach to networked thinking. Educ Inf Technol 11(3):305–318Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Stefanovic M (2013) The objectives, architectures and effects of distance learning laboratories for industrial engineering education. Comput Educ 69:250–262Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Stepanyan K, Littlejohn A, Margaryan A (2013) Sustainable e-learning: toward a coherent body of knowledge. J Educ Technol Soc 16(2):91–102Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Stewart B, Khare A (2012) Athabasca university reduces ict carbon footprint. GSTF J Comput 1(4):70–75Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Stewart B, Khare A (2015) elearning and the sustainable campus. In: Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities. Springer, pp 291–305Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Stiles M, Yorke J (2007) Technology supported learning tensions between innovation, and control and organisational and professional cultures. J Organ Transform Soc Change 3(3):251–267Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Suhonen J, Sutinen E (2014) The four pillar model-analysing the sustainability of online doctoral programmes. TechTrends 58(4):81–88Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D (2008) What drives a successful e-learning? an empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ 50(4):1183–1202Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Thomas L, Trapp S (2007) Building re-configurable blendedlearning arrangements. In: Balkan conference in informatics (BCI 2007), pp 271–280Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Tikhomirova N, Tikhomirov V, Maksimova V, Telnov Y (2012) Knowledge management in the smart university. Proc Eur Conf Knowl Manag 2:1172–1178Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Tomkinson B, Hutt I (2012) Online pbl: a route to sustainability education? Campus-Wide Inf Syst 29(4):291–303Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Toppin IN, Toppin SM (2016) Virtual schools: the changing landscape of k-12 education in the us. Educ Inf Technol 21(6):1571–1581Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Törngren M, Bensalem S, McDermid J, Passerone R, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A, Schätz B (2015) Education and training challenges in the era of cyber-physical systems: beyond traditional engineering. In: Proceedings of the WESE’15: workshop on embedded and cyber-physical systems education, WESE’15. ACM. pp 8:1–8:5Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Trajkovik V, Caporali E, Palmisano E, Valdiserri J (2010) Establishing a videoconferencing infrastructure in the republic of macedonia as an engineering educational service. In: Joint International IGIP-SEFI annual conference, SEFIGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Tuparov G, Kostadinova H, Tuparova D, Raykova M (2014) Approaches for competencies assessment in open source e-learning environments. In: Global engineering education conference (EDUCON). IEEE, pp 529–532Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Uden L, Wangsa IT, Damiani E (2007) The future of e-learning: E-learning ecosystem. In: 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and technologies conference, pp 113–117.  https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2007.371955
  157. 157.
    Vogel B, Kurti A, Milrad M, Johansson E, Müller M (2014) Mobile inquiry learning in sweden: development insights on interoperability, extensibility and sustainability of the LETS GO software system. Educ Technol Soc 17(2):43–57Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Vovides Y, Chale SB, Gadhula R, Kebaetse MB, Nigussie NA, Suleman F, Tibyampansha D, Ibrahim GR, Ntabaye M, Frehywot S et al (2014) A systems approach to implementation of elearning in medical education: five mepi schools’ journeys. Acad Med 89(8):S102–S106Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Wang R, Scown P, Urquhart C, Hardman J (2014) Tapping the educational potential of facebook: guidelines for use in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 19(1):21–39Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Weichhart G (2015) Supporting the evolution and interoperability of organisational models with e-learning technologies. Ann Rev Control 39:118–127Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Winfree T, Goldacre P, Sherkat M, Graham P, Mendoza A, Miller T (2017) Learning for low carbon living: the potential of mobile learning applications for built environment trades and professionals in Australia. Proc Eng 180:1773–1783Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering, EASE ’14. ACM, pp 38:1–38:10Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Yigit T, Isik AH, Ince M (2014) Web-based learning object selection software using analytical hierarchy process. Softw IET 8(4):174–183Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Zheng Q, He H, Ma T, Xue N, Li B, Dong B (2014) Big log analysis for e-learning ecosystem. In: The 11th international conference on e-business engineering. IEEE, pp 258–263Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Zon G, Corrigan S, McDonald N, Maij A (2012) A learning, training & mentoring framework (ltm) & the role of serious games to facilitate sustainable change in the aviation industry. In: 11th International probabilistic safety assessment and management conference and the annual european safety and reliability conference, vol 6, pp 5044–5051Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed D. Alharthi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Spichkova
    • 1
  • Margaret Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations