Requirements Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 63–93

Eliciting security requirements and tracing them to design: an integration of Common Criteria, heuristics, and UMLsec

Special Issue - Security Requirements Engineering

Abstract

Building secure systems is difficult for many reasons. This paper deals with two of the main challenges: (i) the lack of security expertise in development teams and (ii) the inadequacy of existing methodologies to support developers who are not security experts. The security standard ISO 14508 Common Criteria (CC) together with secure design techniques such as UMLsec can provide the security expertise, knowledge, and guidelines that are needed. However, security expertise and guidelines are not stated explicitly in the CC. They are rather phrased in security domain terminology and difficult to understand for developers. This means that some general security and secure design expertise are required to fully take advantage of the CC and UMLsec. In addition, there is the problem of tracing security requirements and objectives into solution design, which is needed for proof of requirements fulfilment. This paper describes a security requirements engineering methodology called SecReq. SecReq combines three techniques: the CC, the heuristic requirements editor HeRA, and UMLsec. SecReq makes systematic use of the security engineering knowledge contained in the CC and UMLsec, as well as security-related heuristics in the HeRA tool. The integrated SecReq method supports early detection of security-related issues (HeRA), their systematic refinement guided by the CC, and the ability to trace security requirements into UML design models. A feedback loop helps reusing experience within SecReq and turns the approach into an iterative process for the secure system life-cycle, also in the presence of system evolution.

Keywords

Security requirement elicitation Common Criteria (CC) UMLsec Heuristics Secure design 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Connected Objects Laboratory, Service Platform GroupTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Fakultät für InformatikTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  3. 3.Software Engineering GroupLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany
  4. 4.Chair for Software Engineering(14)Technische Universität DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations