Skip to main content
Log in

Chirurgische Therapie des Analkarzinoms

Protektion und Salvage-Operation

Surgical treatment of anal cancer

Protection and salvage therapy

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die primäre Therapie des Analkarzinoms ist die kurative Radiochemotherapie. Nach Diagnosesicherung besteht die Rolle des Chirurgen in der Behandlung von lokalen Komplikationen durch Sicherung der Stuhlpassage und Protektion des Perineums durch die laparoskopischen Anlage eines künstlichen Darmausganges. Bei Patienten mit Tumorpersistenz oder -rezidiv nach Radiochemotherapie kann durch die chirurgische Salvage-Therapie im Sinne einer abdominoperinealen Rektumexstirpation eine deutliche Besserung der onkologischen Prognose erzielt werden. Diese geht jedoch mit einer hohen Morbidität von bis zu 80% einher, zu der insbesondere Wundheilungsstörungen im Bereich des Perineums beitragen. Deswegen sollen primär myokutane Lappenplastiken zur Deckung der perinealen Resektionshöhle verwendet werden, wodurch die Rate an Wundheilungsstörungen substanziell gesenkt werden kann.

Abstract

The primary therapy of anal cancer is curative radiochemotherapy. Following a confirmed diagnosis the role of the surgeon is the treatment of local complications of anal cancer by securing bowel passage and protection of the perineum by laparoscopic placement of a preternatural anus or stoma. For patients with a persistent or recurrent tumor following radiochemotherapy a clear improvement in the oncological process can be achieved by surgical salvage therapy using an abdominoperineal rectum extirpation. However, this is accompanied by a high morbidity of up to 80%. Of particular importance here are disturbances in wound healing in the perineum; therefore, a primary myocutaneous flap surgery can be used to cover the perineal resection wound and the rate of disturbances in wound healing can be substantially reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2011) US intergroup anal carcinoma trial: tumor diameter predicts for colostomy. J Clin Oncol 27:1116–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbari RP, Paty PB, Guillem JG et al (2004) Oncologic outcomes of salvage surgery for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus initially managed with combined modality therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1136–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai YK, Cao WL, Gao JD et al (2004). Surgical salvage therapy of anal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 10:424–426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark MA, Hartley A, Geh JI (2004) Cancer of the anal canal. Lancet Oncol 5:149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damin DC, Rosito MA, Schwartsmann G (2006) Sentinel lymph node in carcinoma of the anal canal: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:247–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eeson G, Foo M, Harrow S et al (2011) Outcomes of salvage surgery for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus following failed combined modality treatment. Am J Surg 201:628–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Faynsod M, Vargas HI, Tolmos J et al (2000) Patterns of recurrence in anal canal carcinoma. Arch Surg 135:1090–1093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferenschild FT, Vermaas M, Hofer SO et al (2005) Salvage abdominoperineal resection and perineal wound healing in local recurrent or persistent anal cancer. World J Surg 29:1452–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghouti L, Houvenaeghel G, Moutardier V et al (2005) Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heitland W (2008) Diagnostik und Therapie des Analkarzinoms. Chirurg 79:183–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kernéis S et al (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250:707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leonard D, Beddy D, Dozois EJ (2011) Neoplasms of anal canal and perianal skin. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:54–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mistrangelo M, Pelosi E, Bellò M et al (2010) Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of inguinal node metastases in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nilsson PJ, Svensson C, Goldman S et al (2002) Salvage abdominoperineal resection in anal epidermoid cancer. Br J Surg 89:1425–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nilsson PJ (2006) Omentoplasty in abdominoperineal resection: a review of the literature using a systematic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1354–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11:806–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivatto LO, Cabral V, Rosa A et al (2011) Mitomycin-C- or cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for anal canal carcinoma: long-term results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:490–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortholan C, Ramaioli A, Peiffert D et al (2005) Anal canal carcinoma: early-stage tumors < or = 10 mm (T1 or Tis): therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Papaconstantinou HT, Bullard KM, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (2006) Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failed Nigro protocol: modest success, major morbidity. Colorectal Dis 8:124–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Renehan AG, Saunders MP, Schofield PF et al (2005) Patterns of local disease failure and outcome after salvage surgery in patients with anal cancer. Br J Surg 92:605–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiller DE, Cummings BJ, Rai S (2007) Outcomes of salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2780–2789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shukla HS, Tewari M (2010) An evolution of clinical application of inferior pedicle based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal defects after radical surgery for cancer. J Surg Oncol 102:287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart D, Yan Y, Kodner IJ et al (2007) Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiation for anal canal cancer: should the paradigm be changed for high-risk tumors? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1744–1751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sunesen KG, Buntzen B, Tei T et al (2009) Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol 16:68–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sunesen KG, Nørgaard M, Lundby L et al (2011) Cause-specific colostomy rates after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a Danish multicentre cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29:3535–3540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tei TM, Stolzenburg T, Buntzen S et al (2003) Use of transpelvic rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for anal cancer salvage surgery. Br J Surg 90:575–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wal BC van der, Cleffken BI, Gulec B et al (2001) Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma following combined chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 5:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wright JL, Gollub MJ, Weiser MR et al (2011) Surgery and high-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1090–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Senninger FACS, FRCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rijcken, E., Senninger, N. Chirurgische Therapie des Analkarzinoms. Onkologe 18, 692–698 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2265-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2265-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation