Advertisement

Internet-delivered psychological interventions for clinical anxiety and depression in perinatal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Siobhan A. LoughnanEmail author
  • Amy E. Joubert
  • Ashlee Grierson
  • Gavin Andrews
  • Jill M. Newby
Review Article

Abstract

Perinatal anxiety and depression are common and associated with negative outcomes if left untreated. Internet-delivered treatments can improve treatment accessibility and have demonstrated effectiveness in treating anxiety and depression in the general adult population. However, little is known about how effective and acceptable these interventions are for perinatal women. This paper describes a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis of internet-delivered psychological interventions for the treatment of clinical anxiety and depression in perinatal women. A systematic search was carried out of seven electronic databases. Seven studies evaluating six distinct internet-delivered psychological interventions were identified. Of the seven studies included, two were open trials and five were randomized controlled trials with a total of 595 participants. Preliminary findings indicate large improvements in depression (Hedges g = 1.67; 95% CI 1.38–1.96) and anxiety (Hedges g = 1.08; 95% CI 0.80–1.36) from pre- to post-treatment. However, between-group differences between interventions and control conditions were only moderate for depression (Hedges g = 0.60; 95% CI 0.43–0.78) and anxiety (Hedges g = 0.54; 95% CI 0.24–0.85). While our preliminary findings are promising, this review identifies an area of research still in its early stages with significant gaps in the literature that need to be addressed. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy and acceptability of these interventions in this population, especially for antenatal depression and anxiety disorders.

Keywords

Pregnancy Postpartum Anxiety Depression Internet 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

SL, JN, and GA designed the study and wrote the protocol and search strategy. SL, AJ, and AG conducted the searches, screened the titles, abstracts, and full-texts for eligibility for inclusion into the meta-analysis, and coded the risk of bias of all RCTs. SL extracted the data from the manuscripts, independently checked by AJ, and conducted the data analysis with supervision from JN. All authors contributed to and have approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian Rotary Health and the David Henning Memorial Foundation in the form of a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to Siobhan Loughnan. Jill Newby is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)/Medical Research Future Fund Career Development Fellowship (1145382).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Protocol and registration

The protocol for this systematic review was developed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins and Green 2011) and was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42016038032]. All reporting of this systematic review follows the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al. 2009).

Disclaimer

NHMRC, Rotary Health Australia, and the David Henning Memorial Foundation had no role in the study design, collection, data analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

References

  1. Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N (2010) Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 5(10):e13196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews G, Basu A, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, English C, Newby JM (2018) Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: an updated meta-analysis (in press). J Anxiety Disord 55:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford MT, Olander EK, Ayers S (2016) Computer- or web-based interventions for perinatal mental health: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 197:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balk EM, Earley A, Patel K, Trikalinos TA, Dahabreh IJ (2012) Empirical assessment of within-arm correlation imputation in trials of continuous outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115797/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK115797.pdf: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  5. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Beck depression inventory (2nd edition) - manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1(2):97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlöf E (2018) Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther 47(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuijpers P, Brännmark JG, van Straten A (2008) Psychological treatment of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 64(1):103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G (2010a) Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med 40(12):1943–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuijpers P, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, Hollon SD, Andersson G (2010b) Efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias. Br J Psychiatry 196(3):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danaher BG, Milgrom J, Seeley JR, Stuart S, Schembri C, Tyler MS, … Kosty DB (2013) MomMoodBooster web-based intervention for postpartum depression: feasibility trial results. J Med Internet Res 15(11)Google Scholar
  14. Dennis CL, Chung-Lee L (2006) Postpartum depression help-seeking barriers and maternal treatment preferences: a qualitative systematic review. Birth 33(4):323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R (2017) Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 210:315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2):455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forsell E, Bendix M, Holländare F, von Schultz BS, Nasiell J, Blomdahl-Wetterholm M, … Söderberg E (2017) Internet delivered cognitive behavior therapy for antenatal depression: a randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord 221:56–64Google Scholar
  18. Goodman JH (2009) Women’s attitudes, preferences, and perceived barriers to treatment for perinatal depression. Birth 36(1):60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedges LV (1981) Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Stat 6(2):107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, Hesser H, El Alaoui S, Kraepelien M, … Andersson G (2014) Effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in routine psychiatric care. J Affect Disord 155:49–58Google Scholar
  21. Higgins J, Green SM (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Retrieved from www.handbook.cochrane.org
  22. Kim DR, Hantsoo L, Thase ME, Sammel M, Epperson C (2014) Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for pregnant women with major depressive disorder. J Women’s Health 23(10):842–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure [electronic version]. J Gen Intern Med 16(9):606–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau Y, Htun TP, Wong SN, Tam WSW, Klainin-Yobas P (2017) Therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms among postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 19(4)Google Scholar
  25. Lee EW, Denison FC, Hor K, Reynolds RM (2016) Web-based interventions for prevention and treatment of perinatal mood disorders: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16(1):38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loughnan SA, Wallace M, Joubert AE, Haskelberg H, Andrews G, Newby JM (2018) A systematic review of psychological treatments for clinical anxiety during the perinatal period. Arch Women's Mental Health 21:481490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0812-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovibond P, Lovibond (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. In: The Psychology Foundation of Australia IncGoogle Scholar
  28. Milgrom J, Danaher BG, Gemmill AW, Holt C, Holt CJ, Seeley JR, … Ericksen, J. (2016) Internet cognitive behavioral therapy for women with postnatal depression: a randomized controlled trial of MumMoodBooster. J Med Internet Res 18(3)Google Scholar
  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134(4):382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nieminen K, Andersson G, Wijma B, Ryding E-L, Wijma K (2016) Treatment of nulliparous women with severe fear of childbirth via the Internet: a feasibility study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 37(2):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O'Mahen HA, Woodford J, McGinley J, Warren FC, Richards DA, Lynch TR, Taylor RS (2013) Internet-based behavioral activation—treatment for postnatal depression (Netmums): a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 150(3):814–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O'Mahen H, Richards D, Woodford J, Wilkinson E, McGinley J, Taylor R, Warren F (2014) Netmums: a phase II randomized controlled trial of a guided Internet behavioural activation treatment for postpartum depression. Psychol Med 44(8):1675–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pugh NE, Hadjistavropoulos HD, Dirkse D (2016) A randomised controlled trial of therapist-assisted, internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for women with maternal depression. PLoS One 11(3):e0149186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sockol L, Epperson CN, Barber JP (2011) A meta-analysis of treatments for perinatal depression. Clin Psychol Rev 31(5):839–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, … Pariante CM (2014) Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet 384(9956):1800–1819Google Scholar
  38. Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M (1998) Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 19(2):84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woody C, Ferrari A, Siskind D, Whiteford H, Harris M (2017) A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord 219:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woolhouse H, Brown S, Krastev A, Perlen S, Gunn J (2009) Seeking help for anxiety and depression after childbirth: results of the maternal health study. Arch Womens Ment Health 12(2):75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siobhan A. Loughnan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amy E. Joubert
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ashlee Grierson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gavin Andrews
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jill M. Newby
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), UNSW School of Psychiatry, Level 4O’Brien Centre, St Vincent’s HospitalSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.School of PsychologyUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations