Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 41–48 | Cite as

The Postpartum Worry Scale–Revised: an initial validation of a measure of postpartum worry

Original Article

Abstract

Postpartum anxiety is a condition of concern due to associated difficulties for the mother, her relationships, and her infant’s development. We revised one measure of postpartum anxiety symptoms, the Postpartum Worry Scale (PWS) to include items that tap concerns related to infant health and development, important potential domains of postpartum worry. This study presents the initial phase of validation for the PWS-R. An online sample of 1,231 mothers of infants ages birth to 24 months completed the PWS-R as well as a battery of measures. We conducted a split-sample confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the latent factor structure, and a series of models were tested to refine the measure. The newly constructed factors were correlated with theoretically similar measures to test the construct validity. Initial model testing revealed a four-factor structure (i.e., Relationships, Household, Time Allocations, and Health and Development) that included 13 items. Two-group CFA confirmed the latent factor structure. Theoretically similar measures correlated moderately with the newly created PWS-R factors. The psychometric findings for the PWS-R provide preliminary support for its use as a measure of postpartum worry. Next steps in the iterative validation process are considered. Recommendations for the PWS-R’s use in clinical and research contexts are discussed.

Keywords

Postpartum anxiety Worry Validation Measure 

References

  1. Abramowitz JS, Schwartz SA, Moore KM (2003) Obsessional thoughts in postpartum females and their partners: content, severity and relationship with depression. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 10:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballard C, Davis R, Handy S, Mohan RNC (1993) Postpartum anxiety in mothers and fathers. Euopeanr Journal of Psychiatry 7:117–121Google Scholar
  3. Beck AT, Steer RA (1987) Beck Depression Inventory-Manual. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA (1988) An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 56:893–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwers EPM, van Baar AL, Pop VJM (2001) Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and subsequent infant development. Infant Behavior and Development 24:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen S, Hoberman H (1983) Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. J Appl Soc Psychol 13:99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, Gwaltney JM Jr (1997) Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 277:1940–1944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craske MG (1999) Anxiety disorders: psychological approaches to theory and treatment. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52:281–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enders CK (2010) Applied missing data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Green JM, Kafetsios K, Statham HE, Snowdon CM (2003) Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge worry scale in a pregnant population. J Heal Psychol 8(6):753–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howell EA (2010) Lack of patient preparation for the postpartum period and patients' satisfaction with their obstetric clinicians. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115(2):284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 3(4):424–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2006) LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc., Skokie, ILGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenny, D. A. (2012). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm/
  19. Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Levin JS (1991) The factor structure of the Pregnancy Anxiety Scale. J Heal Soc Behav 32(4):368–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Little TD, Slegers DW (2005) Factor analysis: multiple groups with means. In: B. Everitt & D.Howell (Eds.) & D. Rindskopf (Section Ed.), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (617–623). Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Locke HJ, Wallace KM (1959) Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: their reliability and validity. Marital and Family Living 21:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matthey S, Barnett B, Howie P, Kavanagh DJ (2003) Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: whatever happened to anxiety? J Affect Disord 74(2):139–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mattick RP, Clark JC (1998) Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther 36:455–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNair D, Lorr M, Droppleman L (1981) EITS manual for the profile of mood states. EITS, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  27. Meade AW, Johnson EC, Braddy PW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. J Appl Psychol 93:568–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD (1990) Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther 28:487–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mineka S, Kelly KA (1989) The relationship between anxiety, lack of control and loss of control. In: Stepkoe A, Appels A (eds) Stress, personal control and health. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp 163–191Google Scholar
  30. Phillips J, Sharpe L, Matthey S, Charles M (2009) Maternally focused worry. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 12(6):409–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rapee RM (2001) The development of generalized anxiety. In: Vasey MW, Dadds MR (eds) The developmental psychopathology of anxiety. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 481–503Google Scholar
  32. Ross LE, Gilbert-Evans SE, Sellers EM, Romach MK (2003) Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Archives of Women's Mental Health 6(1):51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schafer, J. (1999). NORM (version 2.02). [Software]. Available from http://sites.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html#ack/
  34. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuohy A, McVey C (2008) Experience of pregnancy and delivery as predictors of postpartum depression. Psychology, Health and Medicine 13:43–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wenzel A (2011) Anxiety in childbearing women: diagnosis and treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Wenzel A, Haugen EN, Jackson LC, Robinson K (2003) Prevalence of generalized anxiety at eight weeks postpartum. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 6:43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wenzel A, Haugen EN, Jackson LC, Brendle JR (2005) Anxiety disorders at eight weeks postpartum. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 19:295–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wittchen HU, Hoyer J (2001) Generalized anxiety disorder: nature and course. J Clin Psychiatry 62(11):15–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Worthington RL, Dillon FR, Becker-Schutte AM (2005) Development, reliability, and validity of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (LGB-KASH). J Couns Psychol 52:104–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy E. Moran
    • 1
  • Joshua R. Polanin
    • 2
  • Amy Wenzel
    • 3
  1. 1.Erikson InstituteChicagoUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Aaron T. Beck Psychopathology Research Center, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations