Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 77–86

Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status

Original Article

Abstract

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is increasingly used in public health and social service programs serving postpartum women of racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse backgrounds at risk for depression. However, we know little about its factor structure across groups of women with implications for measuring symptom levels in research. This study evaluated the underlying structure of the EPDS using a confirmatory factor analyses model comparison approach of five factor models from the literature in a purposive community sample of 169 postpartum African American women of low socioeconomic status. Participants were identified through an exhaustive review of local health department program files dated August 2006 to August 2010 in a Midwestern state of USA. Tuohy and McVey’s (Br J Clin Psychol 47:153–169, 2008) three-factor model (depression, anxiety, and anhedonia) demonstrated the best fit to the data with a nonsignificant Satora–Bentler scaled chi-square value (21.70, df = 24, p = 0.60) and the lowest root mean square error of approximation (0.00) and standardized root mean square residual (0.05) values. The results call for further study of the factor structure of the EPDS in other racial and ethnic groups and cautious use of the EPDS among perinatal women of racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse backgrounds until its factorial invariance is better understood.

Keywords

Postpartum depression Screening Factor analysis African American women Socioeconomic status 

References

  1. Adouard F, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NM, Golse B (2005) Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Arch Womens Ment Health 8:89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astbury J, Brown S, Lumley J, Small R (1994) Birth events, birth experiences and social differences in postnatal depression. Aust J Public Health 18:176–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedford A, Foulds GA (1978) Delusions-symptoms-states-inventory: state of anxiety and depression (manual). NFER, BerkshireGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler PM (1995) EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software. Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Berle JØ, Aarre TF, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Holsten F (2003) Screening for postnatal depression: validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression. J Affect Disord 76:151–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd RC, Le HN, Somberg R (2005) Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression. Arch Wom Ment Health 8:141–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brouwers EPM, van Baar AL, Pop VJM (2001) Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? J Psychosom Res 51:659–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. U.S. Census Bureau (2000) Census of Population and Housing, Summary File 3, Table 3.Google Scholar
  10. Chabrol H, Teissedre F (2004) Relation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks postpartum. J Reprod Infant Psychol 22:33–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaudron LH, Szilagyi PG, Tang W, Anson E, Talbot NL, Wadkins HIM, Tu X, Wisner KL (2010) Accuracy of depression screening tools for identifying postpartum depression among urban mothers. Pediatr 125:e609–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng C, Fowles ER, Walker LO (2006) Continuing education module: postpartum maternal health care in the United States: a critical review. J Perinat Educ 15:34–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatr 150:782–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis C (2004) Can we identify mothers at risk for postpartum depression in the immediate postpartum period using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale? J Affect Disord 78:163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forero CG, Maydeu-Olivares A, Gallardo-Pujol D (2009) Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: a Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Struct Equ Modeling 16:625–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller WC (2005) Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ).Google Scholar
  17. Goodchild CE, Platts RG, Treharne GJ, Booth DA Excessive negative affect and deficient positive affect in anxiety and depression: balancing the valences in the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Health Psychol Update 14:45-50.Google Scholar
  18. Guedeney N, Fermanian J (1998) Validation study of the French version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): new results about use and psychometric properties. Eur Psychiatr 13:83–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jomeen J, Martin CR (2005) Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 23:143–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jomeen J, Martin CR (2007) Replicability and stability of the multidimensional model of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in late pregnancy. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 14:319–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1996) LISREL user’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaminsky LM, Carlo J, Muench MV, Nath C, Harrigan JT, Canterino J (2008) Screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an indigent population: does a directed interview improve detection rates compared with the standard self-completed questionnaire? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 21:321–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Logsdon MC, Hutti MH (2006) Readability: an important issue impacting healthcare for women with postpartum depression. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 31:350–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matthey S (2008) Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety 25:926–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mîndrilă D (2010) Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: a comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. Int J Digital Soc 1:93–102Google Scholar
  26. Mineka S, Watson D, Clark LA (1998) Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annu Rev Psychol 49:377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montazeri A, Torkan B, Omidvari S (2007) The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale (EPDS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Psychiatry 7.Google Scholar
  28. Mook J, Kleijn WC, van der Ploeg HM (1991) Symptom-positively and -negatively worded items in two popular self-report inventories of anxiety and depression. Psychol Rep 69:551–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nye CD, Drasgow F (2011) Assessing goodness of fit: simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organ Res Methods 14:548–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips J, Charles M, Sharpe L, Matthey S (2009) Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants. J Affect Disord 118:101–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pitt B (1968) ‘Atypical’ depression following childbirth. Br J Psychiatr 114:1325–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pop VJ, Komproe IH, Van Son MJ (1992) Characteristics of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord 26:105–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross LE, Gilbert Evans SE, Sellers EM, Romach MK (2003) Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Arch Wom Ment Health 6:51–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Satorra A, Bentler PM (1994) Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye A, Clogg CC, von Eye A, Clogg CC (eds) Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 399–419Google Scholar
  35. Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66:507–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Small R, Lumley J, Yelland J, Brown S (2007) The performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in English speaking and non-English speaking populations in Australia. Soc Psychiatr Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:70–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snaith RP, Constantopoulos AA, Jardine MY, McGuffin P (1978) A clinical scale for the self-assessment of irritability. Br J Psychiatr 132:164–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steiger JH, Lind JM (1980) Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Tuohy A, McVey C (2008) Subscales measuring symptoms of non-specific depression, anhedonia, and anxiety in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 47:153–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2011) The 2011 HHS poverty guidelines. Fed Regist 76:3637–8Google Scholar
  42. Watson D (2005) Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: a quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol 114:522–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services (2006) Evaluation of Wisconsin’s Medicaid Prenatal Care Coordination Benefit.Google Scholar
  44. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Work, Helen Bader School of Social WelfareUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations